Tag: Tax Policy

Treasury Department Finalizes Regulatory Projects on Carried Interest, Deductibility of Business Interest

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Treasury Department x475

Treasury Department officials are working overtime to complete several multi-year tax regulatory projects before handing authority over to the new Biden Administration. These rules largely relate to the implementation of the Trump Administration’s signature legislative accomplishment, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. 

  • The recently finalized regulations address carried interest and the deductibility of business interest.
  • The IRS on Dec. 29 issued a final revenue procedure (Rev. Proc. 2021-9) creating a safe harbor for senior housing to qualify for an exception to the new limitation on the deductibility of business interest. The statutory exception is available to a “real property trade or business.” Uncertainty regarding whether an assisted living facility would qualify as a real property trade or business has hung over the senior housing industry since the legislation’s enactment. The new revenue procedure puts those lingering concerns to rest and clarifies that senior housing qualifies for the exception, as long as certain requirements are met.
  • In addition, Treasury released supplemental, final regulations on the deductibility of business interest this week.  The rules address changes made in the CARES Act, as well certain transition relief for partnerships (T.D. 9943)
  • The long-awaited carried interest final regulations implement the new three-year holding period requirement for carried interest to qualify for the long-term capital gains preference (T.D. 9945). 
  • The final carried interest regulations address several comments submitted by The Real Estate Roundtable. Roundtable comments aimed to ensure the rules are consistent with legislative intent of the provision (Oct. 5, 2020 comment letter). 
  • Specific improvements in the final carried interest rules provide greater flexibility for a general partner to finance an equity interest in a partnership with a loan from other partners in the partnership. The final rules also clarify that the three-year holding period does not override other provisions of the tax code that treat certain transactions as nontaxable events. 
  • Proposed regulations still outstanding include tax rules related to the transition away from LIBOR as a reference rate in mortgages and other financial contracts (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 11, 2019).

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) will discuss these regulatory efforts in detail on January 27 in conjunction with The Roundtable’s State of the Industry Meeting (all virtual).

#  #  #

Bipartisan House Bill Would Spur Energy Efficiency Upgrades in Commercial and Multifamily Residential Buildings

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Buildings sky

New legislation introduced this week by House Ways and Means Committee members Brad Schneider (D-IL) and Tom Rice (R-SC) would accelerate depreciation for high performance upgrades in commercial and multifamily buildings – creating new jobs in the construction, design, and energy sectors; boosting equipment manufacturing; and reducing the built environment’s carbon footprint. (Rep. Schneider news release, Dec. 9)

  • The Energy Efficient Qualified Improvement Property (E-QUIP) Act proposes the establishment of an elective 10-year, straight-line cost recovery period for a new category of E-QUIP expenditures that meet strict energy efficiency criteria.  The E-QUIP benefit would apply to “above code” heating and cooling equipment; lighting; building shell components (e.g., roofs, insulation, and windows); and “smart controls” (e.g., web-enabled thermostats, occupancy and daylight sensors) – as long as they are installed through 2025.
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer helped to launch support for the E-QUIP Act during a Dec. 8 virtual meeting led by Reps. Schneider and Rice that reached a spectrum of stakeholders representing environmental, manufacturing, and real estate organizations.
  • “The E-QUIP Act checks all of the boxes for smart energy, climate, and economic policy,” DeBoer said. “Installation of high performance HVAC, lights, windows, and other building components will modernize aging buildings, save businesses billions of dollars on their energy bills, create tens of thousands of jobs, and avoid carbon emissions equal to taking 22 million cars off the road for a year. The E-QUIP Act can also encourage state-of-the-art retrofits that enhance outdoor air ventilation rates — a key practice to improve a building’s health and indoor air quality, according to the best available science.”
  • The Roundtable and numerous other stakeholders wrote to congressional tax writers last year about the need to establish an accelerated depreciation schedule for E-QUIP. (Coalition E-QUIP letter, May 8, 2019) 

E-QUIP Analysis

ACEEE E-QUIP research

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) released research this week estimating the E-QUIP Act’s economic and environmental impacts would include:

  • 130,000 net additional job-years
  • $15 billion energy bill savings
  • 100 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions avoided – or the equivalent emissions from 560,000 rail cars full of coal, or taking 22,000 cars off the road for one year.  (ACEEE’s E-QUIP policy brief and fact sheet)
  • “Many building owners want to make energy efficiency investments, but existing law disincentivizes them. This fix will help them upgrade from old equipment to state-of-the-art options that will reduce their energy bills while cutting carbon emissions,” said ACEEE Executive Director Steven Nadel in a press release.
  • Most investments in existing commercial and multifamily buildings are currently ineligible for the immediate tax deductions available to other business investments under the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act. Instead, they are subject to depreciation periods as long as 40 years, depending on the kind of building, whether the investments affect the interior or exterior, and the tax status of the owner.
  • The current patchwork of depreciation periods is largely unrelated to the useful lifetime of the investments. The new E-QUIP proposal would apply uniform criteria to an elective 10-year depreciation period. 
  • The Roundtable and other supporters aim to undertake a coordinated advocacy effort to identify additional House sponsors for the bill, and support introduction of companion legislation in the Senate.

The E-QUIP Act will be discussed in greater detail at the “virtual” meetings of The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) and Sustainability Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC) on Jan. 27.

#  #  # 

Treasury Department Clarifies that Partnership-level State and Local Income Taxes are Deductible

Posted on by Trey Jackson
IRS building in Washington DC

The Treasury Department and IRS in a recent notice indicated their intent to issue proposed regulations clarifying that state and local income taxes imposed on, and paid by, a partnership or an S corporation are deductible in computing the partnership or S corporation’s taxable income.  (IRS Notice 2020-75) 

  • The announcement has important implications for real estate and other businesses operating in States with high state and local income tax burdens.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 limits taxpayers’ ability to deduct state and local taxes (SALT) paid at the level of the individual taxpayer to no more than $10,000. 
  • The SALT limitation in TCJA applies to state and local taxes owed on individual wages, as well as state and local taxes paid on business income distributed to partners or S corporation shareholders.  In contrast, state taxes on corporate income remained deductible under the 2017 legislation.  However, prior to Notice 2020-75, it was unclear whether the SALT limitation applied to entity-level income taxes imposed on, and paid directly by, a partnership or S corporation.   
  • The Treasury announcement is an important step towards creating a more level playing field between publicly held C corporations and privately held pass-through businesses.   
  • Over the last three years, several States have modified their tax laws to allow partnerships, S corporations, and LLC’s to pay tax on their business income at the entity level.  States adopting an entity-level tax on pass-throughs include Connecticut, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.  In most cases, the regimes are elective.  (CNBC, Nov. 18) 
  • Uncertainty about the federal tax treatment of these regimes has limited their effectiveness.  That could change quickly with the new Treasury guidance.  Similar legislative proposals are pending in Alabama, Arkansas, Michigan, and Minnesota and more may follow in light of Treasury’s clarification.  Entity-level regimes that comply with the Treasury regulations could help restore SALT deductions for a significant share of pass-through business income. 

Other tax and economic policy issues affecting real estate were addressed this week in a CBRE panel discussion that featured Roundtable Senior Vice President and Counsel Ryan McCormick and other industry experts. (video)

#  #  # 

Roundtable Commends Aspects of Proposed Carried Interest Regulations While Recommending Further Clarifications and Improvements

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable on Oct. 5 submitted detailed comments to the Treasury Department and IRS on proposed regulations implementing the 3-year holding period requirement for carried interests to qualify for long-term capital gain treatment.  (Roundtable comment letter)

  • Treasury on July 31 released the proposed rules under IRS Section 1061 to address the specific conditions that apply to the 3-year holding period requirement passed by Congress in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017.  (Roundtable Weekly, Aug. 7)
  • The Roundtable commended the agencies for a balanced approach on certain key issues addressed in regulations – yet recommended further clarifications and improvements to the proposed rules to retain the original intent of Congress.  
  • The Roundtable’s comments note that the IRS rules include a number of well-designed provisions that should help avoid unintended consequences when the 3-year holding period is implemented, including:

—  The 3-year requirement is limited to the gain from a sale or exchange of a capital asset – and excludes gain from property used in a trade business (Section 1231 gain). 

—  A useful “look-through” rule to help ensure REIT dividends paid to shareholders receive the same long-term gain treatment that would apply to assets owned individually or in partnership form.

—  A sensible exclusion to ensure a partner’s own capital contributions to the partnership are not subject to re-characterization under section 1061.

Recommendations for Additional Clarifications and Improvements

The Roundtable comment letter also recommends certain changes to the proposed regulations to bring the rules more in line with the legislative intent when Congress enacted section 1061.  The Roundtable recommendations include the following:

  • Provide a safe harbor to allow funds borrowed by a general partner to qualify as a capital interest in the partnership.  Investors frequently require a general partner to co-invest in the partnership to align the parties’ interests.  These co-investments often are financed with loans from the investors.  The proposed regulations would undermine the economics of these arrangements. The 3-year holding period would apply when an investment is made with funds borrowed from the other investors in the partnership.  The Roundtable recommends that the Treasury narrow the broad restriction on borrowed funds by creating a safe harbor for non-abusive situations.
  • Prevent improper acceleration of tax liability when a partnership interest is transferred in a nonrecognition transaction.  Section 1061(d) creates certain tax consequences for transfers of partnership interests to related parties.  The proposed regulations broadly interpret section 1061(d) to override other nonrecognition provisions in the tax code by requiring the inclusion of gross income as a result of such transfers.  The Roundtable recommends that Treasury narrow its current interpretation of the provision to avoid accelerating tax liability in the case of transfers of partnership interests to related parties in nonrecognition transactions.
  • Avoid casting too broad a net on partnerships covered by the 3-year holding period.  Congress limited section 1061 to partnership interests in businesses that raise or return capital on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis.  The proposed rules, however, largely disregard this prong of the test and could capture many real estate arrangements unintended by lawmakers, including joint ventures, operating partnerships, and others.  The Roundtable recommends that Treasury limit application of the provision to businesses that meet the statutory requirements. 

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer concludes the letter by noting, “Congress . . . narrowly drafted section 1061 to apply to specific situations.  Our comments our aimed at preserving the drafters’ intent while avoiding unnecessary disruption to common, everyday real estate partnerships—small and large—throughout the country.”

The recommendations were developed by The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC).

#  #  # 

Proposed Carried Interest Regulations Would Create Complex Regime for Taxing Partnership Profits’ Interests

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Proposed carried interest regulations released by the Treasury Department on July 31 would implement the three-year holding period requirement enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017.  TCJA restricted eligibility for the reduced long-term capital gains rate in the case of certain capital gain allocated to a profits interest in a partnership if the investment is held for less than three years. 

  • The proposed rules under section 1061 represent the first formal Treasury regulations on the issue of carried interest since it emerged as a controversial political issue in 2007.
  • The 3-year holding period requirement reflects a compromise approach developed by key tax-writers during the 2017 tax reform debate.
  • Members of The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) reviewed and discussed the proposed carried interest regulations on August 3. Critically, the 3-year holding period would not apply to property used in a trade or business (section 1231 gain).  In addition, the rules would permit REITs to report capital gains dividends in a manner that facilitates look-through treatment.  Thus, REIT shareholders could take into account whether the underlying REIT gain relates to property that meets the 3-year requirement or relates to property excluded from the rule because it gives rise to section 1231 gain.
  • Certain other aspects of the proposed rules appear less favorable.  For example, the regulations take an expansive view of what constitutes an “applicable partnership interest” subject to the regime.  The exemption for capital gain that relates to a partner’s capital interest involves complex rules and restrictions that may complicate its use.  The regulations appear to import a rule from pending legislation that would prevent partners from crediting partnership capital contributions that are attributable to a loan from other partners or the partnership.
  • Other important aspects of the new regime including detailed rules for: determining the “recharacterization amount” and the applicable holding period, anti-abuse measures, and reporting requirements. 

A TPAC working group will be convening in the days ahead to develop comments and recommendations for Treasury and IRS officials related to the proposed regulations. 

#  #  # 

Business Coalition Urges Senate to Pass Corporate Diversity Legislation

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable and 16 other national organizations sent a letter on July 27 urging leaders of the Senate Banking Committee to advance legislation that would require public companies to report the racial, ethnic and gender composition of their boards and executive officers. (The Hill and coalition letter, July 27)

  • The act would require issuers that must register under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide data regarding diversity on corporate boards and in executive management. Such diversity reporting would occur in annual reports and proxy statements regarding election of directors filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
  • The bill would also require securities issuers to disclose whether it has adopted a plan or strategy to promote board- and executive-level racial, ethnic, gender, and veteran-status diversity.
  • The coalition letter addressed to the Senate Committee’s Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Ranking Member Sherrod Brown (D-OH), cites a 2019 PwC Annual Corporate Directors Survey to show the benefits of diversity.  The survey results show that 94% of participating board directors indicated that a diverse board brings unique perspectives; 87% responded that diversity enhances board performance; and 84% responded that it improves relationships with investors.
  • Presumptive Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden this week presented a series of proposals intended to address racial economic inequality. Biden said that as president, his future appointments to the Federal Reserve would be “diverse nominees for the Board of Governors and the regional Federal Reserve Banks.” (The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times, July 29)
  • Last week the Biden campaign indicated its desire to eliminate several current law tax provisions, including like-kind exchanges under Section 1031, to pay for a 10-year, $775 billion “caregivers” proposal.

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer responded, “The long-standing like-kind exchange tax law has encouraged investment in affordable housing and other properties, generated state and local tax revenue, and spurred new jobs through labor-intensive property improvement. As a result, exchanges allow cash-strapped minority, women, and veteran-owned businesses to grow their business by temporarily deferring tax on the reinvested proceeds.”  (Entire Roundtable Statement on like-kind exchanges, July 21 and Roundtable Weekly, July 24).

#  #  #

Industry Trade Group Leaders Focus on Prospects for Stimulus Legislation and CRE Impact

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer joined other real estate industry trade group leaders in a July 29 Walker & Dunlop webinar “All Eyes On Washington: What will the next stimulus bill do for CRE?” moderated by Roundtable member and W&D Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Willy Walker. 

  • Mortgage Bankers Association CEO and President Bob Broeksmit and National Multifamily Housing Council President Doug Bibby also participated in this “Walker Webcast” to discuss the next $1 trillion+ stimulus bill under consderation on Capitol Hill and its impact on the multifamily, mortgage, and commercial real estate industries.  (Watch video on The Roundtable’s YouTube channel)
  • The three trade group leaders agreed that consensus on a new stimulus bill will stretch into August and predicted a new bill would be passed by Aug. 8 or Aug. 15. Bibby and Broeksmit predicted the legislative package cost would total $1.75 trillion, while DeBoer estimated $2 trillion.  (BisNow, July 29 and ConnectCRE, July 30)
  • DeBoer noted that the real question in determining whether additional funding for state governments, small businesses, and others will be approved is how previous funds allocated by Congress during the pandemic are being allocated.  DeBoer asked, “Are they going to solve COVID-related problems, or solve issues that were pre-existing?”
  • Broeksmit added, “An imperfect compromise is going to emerge, and that’s all right because we need to get the funding out quickly. We don’t have time to get it perfect.”
  • Walker also focused on the federal eviction moratorium, observing that it negatively affects the relationship between landlords and their tenants as they attempt to work through financial challenges of paying rent.
  • “When you have an eviction moratorium, there is a propensity for people to go dark on you,” Walker said. “The owner and tenants stop working with each other. You lose the ability to maintain your community.”
  • Bibby stated that an eviction moratorium may seem appealing but it creates a cycle of economic disinvestment and puts the livelihoods of tens of thousands of owners across the country at risk.
  • DeBoer emphasized that a robust federal rental assistance program to help the unemployed as well as struggling small business is necessary to preserve the “rental obligation chain” that underpins the economy.  He also said The Roundtable supports additional funding for the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which has distributed approximately $520 billion to an estimated 5 million businesses. 
  • DeBoer added that businesses should receive assistance from the government on “new and unusual” expenses related to safety and cleaning protocols.

“We have to think of this period as building a bridge to a time when the economy works again, when businesses are open and when people are employed and can stand on their own two feet again,” said DeBoer. “But we need the bridge to get there, and it needs to be strong enough and long enough.”  (REBusiness Online, July 31 and Walker Webcast video)

#  #  # 

Biden Proposes Taxes on Real Estate Investments and 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges to Pay for Caregiving Plan

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden on July 21 released a policy proposal to fund universal childcare and in-home elder care by taxing real estate investors and targeting the taxation of like-kind exchanges.  (The Real Deal July 21)

  • The proposal states that $775 billion would be raised over 10 years to pay for the plan “… by rolling back unproductive and unequal tax breaks for real estate investors with incomes over $400,000 and taking steps to increase tax compliance for high-income earners.” 
  •  A senior Biden campaign official added the plan would prevent investors from using real estate losses to lower their income tax bills and would take aim at the taxation of like-kind exchanges, according to a Bloomberg report. 
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer responded by noting the many ways in which like-kind exchanges contribute to economic growth and create greater opportunity for entrepreneurs from under-represented demographic groups.
  • “The long-standing like-kind exchange tax law has encouraged investment in affordable housing and other properties, generated state and local tax revenue, and spurred new jobs through labor-intensive property improvement.  Exchanges reduce the need for outside financing, leading to less leverage and debt on U.S. real estate. As a result, exchanges allow cash-strapped minority, women, and veteran-owned businesses to grow their business by temporarily deferring tax on the reinvested proceeds,” DeBoer said.
  • He added, “Like-kind exchanges are particularly important during economic downturns when access to capital is less certain. In short, like-kind exchanges create a more dynamic real estate marketplace, ensuring properties do not languish, permanently underutilized and under-invested. Congressional review of like-kind exchanges is reasonable and appropriate, and we will support sensible reforms, as The Roundtable has in the past, that preserve and maintain the provision’s broad-based economic benefits.”  (National Real Estate Investor, July 21)
  • “The Biden Plan for Mobilizing American Talent and Heart to Create a 21st Century Caregiving and Education Workforce” does not contain details on the specific changes to like-kind exchange (LKE) taxation.  (CNBC, July 21)

A 2015 economic study commissioned by The Real Estate Roundtable and other national real estate organizations on the US commercial real estate market highlights the critical role that 1031 exchanges play in stabilizing rents, safeguarding  property values and strengthening the economy.   (“The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate” by Professors David C. Ling and Milena Petrova)  

#  #  #

Republicans Seek Intra-Party Consensus on Coronavirus Aid as Unemployment Benefits Expire and Democrats Wait to Begin Negotiations

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The White House and Senate Republicans have reached an “agreement in principle” on GOP priorities for another COVID-19 relief package but legislative text is still in the drafting phase, as negotiations in earnest with Democrats have yet to commence. (The Hill, NPR, and Law 360, July 23)

  • Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) outlined GOP priorities during a July 22 floor speech on the next COVID-19 bill. (News release and transcript of Portman’s comments and YouTube video.) Republicans are reportedly in broad agreement on issues such as a liability shield for businesses from frivolous COVID-related lawsuits, a new targeted round of forgivable Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans for small business, and funds to help schools re-open, but “[w]e’re still developing the bill,” said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA). (B-Gov, July 23)
  • The GOP proposal is also expected to include additional unemployment benefits that expire this month, but less than the $600 per week boost Congress approved in March as part of the CARES Act. (Roundtable Weekly, March 27 and July 17). Republicans’ next plan is expected to fall within the $1 to $1.5 trillion dollar range.
  • The Democratic starting point for negotiations is the $3.4 trillion HEROES Act (H.R. 6800) passed by the House of Representatives in May (See one-pager; section-by-section; state and local relief summary and Roundtable Weekly, May 22).  Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) expressed her conference’s perspective that the GOP’s relief proposal “falls very short of the challenge that we face in order to defeat the virus and to open our schools and to open our economy.” (July 23 news conference video, The Hill)

Healthy Workplaces Tax Credit

Bipartisan support is growing for a “re-opening tax credit” in the next COVID-19 response package, which could offer businesses assistance in helping defray extra costs associated with workplace cleaning, disinfecting, personal protective equipment, and virus testing. (The Hill, July 16 and Roundtable Weekly, July 17)

  • Legislation includes the Clean Start: Back to Work Tax Credit Act (H.R. 7079) – introduced by Reps. Darin LaHood (R-IL) and Stephanie Murphy (D-FL). The bill proposes a credit maximum of $250,000 per business entity, up to $25,000 per location. (LaHood news release, May 29)
  • LaHood discussed his tax credit proposal and other pandemic relief measures yesterday in a video discussion with Roundtable President and CEO, Jeffrey D. DeBoer.  Watch the July 23 LaHood discussion on The Roundtable’s Youtube channel.
  • Additionally,  Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) this week introduced the Healthy Workplaces Tax Credit Act, which proposes a refundable payroll tax credit with a phased amount based on the number of a business’s employees that would cover 50% of costs associated with PPE, cleaning, disinfecting, testing, and reconfiguring workspaces (Portman news release , July 20).  Rep. Tom Rice introduced companion legislation in the House.      
  • A broad business coalition, including The Real Estate Roundtable, urged Congress on July 16 to include a “healthy workplaces” tax credit in the next coronavirus relief bill.  (Coalition letter,  July 16 and  Roundtable Weekly,  July 17) 

Liability Protections and Minority Credit Legislation

Governors from 21 states urged Congress this week to provide “common sense” civil liability protections to health care workers, businesses, and schools in the next COVID-19 response package. (Governors’ Letter, July 21)

  • Republican Senators have indicated liability protections remain a leading priority for inclusion in the next relief package.  A draft outline of the Senate’s new COVID-19-related liability protections for businesses proposes a five-year shield from coronavirus lawsuits. (The Hill, Fox Business, CBS News, and Roundtable Weekly, July 17)
  • The Senate summary reflects principals supported by The Roundtable that were part of a multi-sector coalition letter sent to Hill leadership on May 27.  (Roundtable Weekly, May 29)
  • Separately, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer  (D-NY) and Senators Mark Warner (D-VA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Kamala Harris (D-CA) introduced legislation on July 21 to invest $17.9 billion in low-income and minority communities especially hard-hit by the COVID-19 crisis.  Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) introduced companion legislation in the House.
  • The Jobs and Neighborhood Investment Act would provide eligible community development financial institutions (CDFIs) and Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) with capital, liquidity, and operational capacity to expand the flow of credit into underserved, minority, and historically disadvantaged communities.
  • The sponsors aim to include the measure in upcoming COVID-19 relief legislation to help small businesses remain solvent and expand operations, while providing affordable access to credit for lower income borrowers.

Congress faces a tight deadline to address a multitude of economic and health policy issues related to COVID-19 in an omnibus bill before breaking for its August recess.  (The Hill, July 20)

Real Estate Roundtable Statement on Biden Like-Kind Exchange Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden on July 21, 2020 released a policy proposal to fund universal childcare and in-home elder care by taxing real estate investors and targeting the taxation of like-kind exchanges.  Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer responded by noting the many ways in which like-kind exchanges contribute to economic growth and create greater opportunity for entrepreneurs from under-represented demographic groups.

  • “The long-standing like-kind exchange tax law has encouraged investment in affordable housing and other properties, generated state and local tax revenue, and spurred new jobs through labor-intensive property improvement.  Exchanges reduce the need for outside financing, leading to less leverage and debt on U.S. real estate. As a result, exchanges allow cash-strapped minority, women, and veteran-owned businesses to grow their business by temporarily deferring tax on the reinvested proceeds,” DeBoer said.
  • He added, “Like-kind exchanges are particularly important during economic downturns when access to capital is less certain. In short, like-kind exchanges create a more dynamic real estate marketplace, ensuring properties do not languish, permanently underutilized and under-invested. Congressional review of like-kind exchanges is reasonable and appropriate, and we will support sensible reforms, as The Roundtable has in the past, that preserve and maintain the provision’s broad-based economic benefits.” 

A 2015 economic study commissioned by The Real Estate Roundtable and other national real estate organizations on the US commercial real estate market highlights the critical role that 1031 exchanges play in stabilizing rents, safeguarding  property values and strengthening the economy.   (“The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate” by Professors David C. Ling and Milena Petrova)