Tag: SALT

Real Estate Industry Urges Congress to Preserve Deductibility of Business Property Taxes

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

As discussions continue between the House, Senate, and Administration on how to move forward with a tax and fiscal package, The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and sixteen other national real estate organizations wrote to members of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees urging them to oppose any proposal that would cap or eliminate the deductibility of state and local business property taxes.  (Letter)

A cap on property tax deductibility could have devastating consequences for commercial real estate owners, developers, and investors nationwide.

Why It Matters

  • Republican lawmakers intend to enact a major tax and fiscal package this year, and they are under pressure to identify additional revenue offsets to finance a growing list of priorities.  Ways and Means Committee Republican Members have scheduled all-day, closed-door meetings next week to discuss the details of their tax plan.
  • Some lawmakers have raised “Business SALT” and potential restrictions on the deductibility of state and local property and income taxes as a possible revenue offset for the tax bill (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 28)
  • Eliminating the business deduction for property taxes would be the equivalent of raising business owners’ property tax bills by roughly 40 percent, causing employers to owe federal tax on money that they do not have.
  • “Business taxes are fundamentally different from state and local individual income taxes.  State and local business taxes are an unavoidable expense, an inescapable cost of doing business,” said Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer.  (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 21)
  • DeBoer’s comments were echoed this week in analyses from the Tax Foundation and former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin.  (Tax Foundation, March 3; American Action Forum, March 6).
  • “Firms deduct the costs of generating income—wages, rents, capital costs, etc.—and CSALT is the recognition of those costs. Fully deducting those taxes is … necessary to correctly tax firms. Capping CSALT is professional malpractice,” said Holtz-Eakin.

Effects on CRE and the Broader Economy

  • The ripple effects of this proposal would extend far beyond property owners to impact the broader economy and housing affordability nationwide.
  • U.S. commercial real estate is valued at $18-$22 trillion, supporting 15 million jobs and generating $2.3 trillion in GDP annually.
  • This tax change could reverse the benefits of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and Section 199A, potentially raising effective tax rates to 1970s-era levels near 50%.
  • “A cap on the deductibility of property taxes paid by businesses, “would cause self-inflicted injury to the U.S. economy, including unnecessary job losses, higher rents for families and individuals, and other inflationary pressures,” DeBoer said this week.  “It would lower commercial property values and create new stresses in the banking system. It is a recipe for a recession.”
  • Additionally, the increased tax burdens could discourage new investment, deter housing development, and exacerbate the national housing crisis.

Call to Action

  • RER urges members to amplify this message to their representatives in Congress.
  • Given that U.S. businesses paid $1.1 trillion in state and local business-related taxes in 2023 (including nearly $400 billion in property taxes), the stakes are extremely high.

Next Steps

  • House and Senate Republicans remain divided on several key issues as they work to prevent a March 14 government shutdown and agree on the parameters of a larger tax and fiscal reconciliation bill. (USA Today, March 7)

The impasse centers on whether to pursue one big bill or a two-bill strategy, the size of spending reductions, how to deal with the debt ceiling, and the budget baseline that will determine the need for offsetting tax increases.  The impasse could push resolution of the tax issues into the second half of the year.

Real Estate Challenges: Business SALT, Carried Interest Emerge as Focal Points of Tax and Budget Discussions

Posted on by Cole Kline

As congressional Republicans weigh their budget options and consider competing plans from both the House and Senate, their search for revenue offsets has included proposals to restrict the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) on businesses and raise the tax rate on carried interest. 

Business SALT

  • Prior to the markup of its budget resolution, the House Budget Committee floated a menu of potential revenue offsets for reconciliation legislation, including a proposal to “eliminate the business SALT deduction.” (New York Times, Jan. 28)

  • Depending on how broadly the business SALT limitation is designed, it could include repealing the deductibility of state and local property taxes paid by commercial real estate owners.  Hill discussions on business SALT have intensified in recent weeks.  (Bloomberg, Feb. 18)
     
  • “Eliminating the business deduction for property taxes would be the equivalent of raising business owners’ property tax bills by roughly 40 percent.  Employers would owe federal tax on money that they do not have.  It would lead to insolvencies and foreclosures. It would cause self-inflicted injury to the U.S. economy, including unnecessary job losses, higher rents for families and individuals, and other inflationary pressures.  It is a recipe for a recession,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable.

  • The idea of limiting business SALT has support from several outside organizations and, according to Politico, was initially floated by members of the House Freedom Caucus.  (Politico, Jan. 15)

  • “Business taxes are fundamentally different from state and local individual income taxes.  State and local business taxes are an unavoidable expense, an inescapable cost of doing business,” noted DeBoer. “Property taxes alone are, on average, 40% of operating costs for real estate businesses.  In many cases, capping the deductibility of property taxes would require businesses to pay income tax when their actual income and cash flow is negative.”

  • The Roundtable is working, alongside its real estate trade association partners, to raise awareness among policymakers of the risk and harm that a cap on business SALT poses for the industry and the broader economy.  

Carried Interest

  • President Trump’s recent call on Congress to close the “carried interest tax deduction loophole” has put a national spotlight back on the issue of carried interest and its proper tax treatment.  (Financial Times, Feb. 6)  

  • Trump’s expression of support for raising taxes on carried interest led Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and others to reintroduce legislation, the Carried Interest Fairness Act. The bill would recharacterize all carried interest as ordinary income. (Politico, Feb. 18)

  • Sen. Baldwin filed a nonbinding amendment on carried interest during the Senate budget resolution debate this week but did not offer it for a formal vote.  

  • Carried interest emerged as a political issue in 2007, but remains largely misunderstood to this day. In real estate, carried interest is not compensation for services. General partners receive fees, taxed at ordinary rates, for routine services like leasing and property management. Carried interest is granted for the value the general partner adds, such as business acumen, experience, and relationships. It is also recognition for the risks the general partner takes.   

  • In response to the new legislation, the Americans for Tax Reform—alongside a broad coalition of other taxpayer advocacy groups—penned a comment letter urging lawmakers to consider the negative ramifications of this policy.

  • In the letter, the organizations argue that the proposal would discourage investment and reduce growth, urging Congress to oppose the bill. “The current tax treatment of carried interest is an intentional, pro-growth feature of the tax code for more than 100 years that incentivizes risk-taking and entrepreneurship, benefiting investors, public pension funds and retirees.” (Americans for Tax Reform, Feb. 19)

  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 extended the holding period required for carried interest income to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment from one year to three years.

  • The false narrative surrounding the carried interest issue is that it targets only a handful of hedge fund billionaires and Wall Street executives. The carried interest legislation is far broader and would apply to real estate partnerships of all sizes.

  • “Taxing carried interest at ordinary income rates would discourage the risk taking that drives job creation and economic growth. It would reduce economic mobility by increasing the tax burden on cash-poor entrepreneurs who want to retain an ownership interest in their business. It would have profound unintended consequences for housing affordability and main streets all across our country,” said DeBoer.

Looking Ahead

As tax negotiations develop, RER will continue to engage with congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle to inform policymakers about the real-world consequences of proposed changes to the deductibility of business SALT and tax treatment of carried interest.  

While the budget debate will move forward, it will likely be several weeks, if not months, before the tax-writing committees mark-up and vote on the actual details of their tax and revenue legislation.

House Freedom Caucus Members Propose Ending Deductibility of State and Local Business Taxes

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, House Freedom Caucus Members proposed ending the ability of businesses to deduct their state and local business and property taxes on their federal income tax returns.  (Politico, Jan. 15)

Why It Matters

  • The proposal was raised as a potential offset for relief from the SALT cap on individuals. 
  • The proposal was also included in a “menu” of potential policy options prepared by the House Budget Committee for tax and budget reconciliation legislation.  (PoliticoPro, Jan. 17)
  • The Budget Committee has a key role in setting the overall size of any reconciliation bill, but the actual details of tax changes fall under the jurisdiction of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Industry & Congressional Response

  • “Property taxes and other state-level business taxes are a basic cost of doing business.  Denying the deductibility of these business taxes is nonsensical and would be devastating to American businesses, and especially U.S. real estate.  The purpose of the income tax is to measure and tax income.  Under the proposal, we would no longer have an income tax, we would have a tax on gross revenue.  It would penalize existing property owners, artificially distort business decisions, and raise flashing red lights for anyone even considering a long-term capital investment in the United States,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable.
  • Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) addressed the proposal on the Senate floor earlier today.  (Senate Democrats, Jan. 17)
  • “There is no scenario under God’s green Earth that New York taxpayers will ever accept another unfair SALT cap like the House Freedom Caucus proposes….I will do everything I can, first to remove the entire SALT cap tax, and second to never let a new proposal that for the first time imposes the SALT cap on businesses, small and large, to be put into effect. I’m going to do everything I can to fight this dastardly proposal,” said the Senator.
  • The House Freedom Caucus is one of many factions in the House Republican Conference that will have significant leverage over any tax changes in 2025 due to Republicans’ extraordinary slim majority in the House.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) and House SALT Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) are scheduled to address Roundtable members at the State of the Industry Meeting next week.

GOP Leaders Debate Strategy for Reconciliation in 2025

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

Republicans are divided on how to approach a sweeping legislative package in 2025, as debates intensify between House and Senate GOP leaders considering whether to consolidate tax, border security, energy, and defense priorities into a single reconciliation bill or pursue a two-step approach. (TaxNotes, Dec. 12)

The Debate

  • The outcome will shape the GOP’s legislative strategy as they prepare to extend key provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and deliver on other campaign promises.  
  • House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith (R-MO) is advocating for a single reconciliation bill that combines tax policy with border and energy reforms, arguing that this approach maximizes the slim Republican majority’s ability to pass ambitious legislation.
  • Rep. Smith’s stance has put him at odds with incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), who prefers a two-bill strategy—one focused on border security and energy early in the year, followed by a tax package later. (PoliticoPro, Dec. 11)
  • Sen. Thune, backed by Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and incoming White House policy advisor Stephen Miller, see an early legislative win on immigration as critical to setting the stage for more complex tax negotiations. (Axios, Dec. 9)
  • Rep. Smith, contends that splitting the package could jeopardize tax policy priorities, including extensions of TCJA provisions set to expire at the end of 2025. (Roundtable Weekly, Dec. 6)
  • Failure to act on tax reform by the end of 2025 will lead to the expiration of many provisions of the 2017 tax law, resulting in tax increases for most individuals and some businesses. (Bloomberg, Dec. 3)

View from the Senate

  • While negotiations continue, Sen. Thune said he’s eyeing a “big early win” for President-elect Trump with a party-line push on border security, military and energy provisions. “Failure is not an option as far as tax is concerned.” (Politico, Dec. 11)

View from the House

  • House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) said Tuesday House leadership is still deciding on a one- or two-bill strategy, and that they have been meeting with House and Senate members, including Sen. Thune and incoming Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-ID). He warned it would be challenging to pass multiple budget resolutions. (TaxNotes, Dec. 11)
  • “Donald Trump is the whip right now,” Scalise said, describing how Trump would corral votes from House Republicans. “You don’t have to worry about me; I’m actually a nice guy. The guy at 1600 Pennsylvania is going to send out a tweet, a truth, or whatever, and it’s not going to be as nice.” (TaxNotes, Dec. 11)

Government Funding

  • Members on both sides of the aisle expect the government will stay open past the Dec. 20 shutdown deadline. (GlobeSt. Dec. 11)
  • Lawmakers anticipate leadership will settle on a stopgap measure extending through next March, though some Republicans in both chambers are advocating for a CR that ends sooner to expedite Congress’s funding work. (The Hill, Dec. 11).

Challenges Ahead

  • Narrow majorities: House Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes, making consensus critical. Senate Republicans face their own challenges under reconciliation rules requiring compliance with strict budget parameters. (NBC News, Dec. 12)
  • SALT deduction disputes: Republicans from high-tax states like New York and New Jersey are expected to push for raising the $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, which could complicate efforts to unify the caucus.
  • Economist Stephen Moore, a member of President-elect Trump’s economic advisory transition team, told Bloomberg that expanding the tax write-off limit from $10,000 to $20,000 has been discussed. (TaxNotes, Dec. 11 | Bloomberg, Dec. 12)

What’s Next

  • House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) faces mounting pressure to navigate the narrow majority and align the party’s legislative strategy with President-elect Trump’s priorities.
  • Johnson has indicated flexibility in the approach, noting ongoing discussions with Trump and GOP leaders.
  • House Republicans are preparing to move swiftly in early January, with Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) leading efforts on a budget resolution to lay the groundwork for reconciliation. Arrington has emphasized the need for a streamlined process, warning that delays could jeopardize Republican priorities. (TaxNotes, Dec. 12)
  • Passage of a budget resolution, which is the first key step in the reconciliation process, will be crucial to move forward—a challenge in itself given the slim GOP majority in the House.

The text of the funding bill is anticipated to be released over the weekend or early next week, enabling both chambers to pass the measure before lawmakers adjourn until January.

Senate Finance Committee Tackles 2025 Tax Policy Debate

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on the 2025 tax policy debate, highlighting sharp divides between Republicans and Democrats over the future of the key provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) that are set to expire in 2025. (Watch Hearing | Bloomberg, Sept. 12)

2025 Tax Policy Debate

  • Chair Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) pushed for reforms targeting tax avoidance by the ultra-wealthy. Wyden pointed out tactics like “buy, borrow, die,” which he argues allow billionaires to accumulate wealth without paying appropriate taxes, and criticized corporate tax loopholes​. (Sen. Wyden Statement)
  • Ranking Member Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) defended the TCJA, emphasizing its positive impact on economic growth, job creation, and tax relief for middle-class Americans. Sen. Crapo warned that allowing the TCJA to expire would result in significant tax increases for individuals and businesses, harming the economy. (Sen. Crapo Statement)
  • Jeff Brabant, VP of Federal Government Relations at the National Federation of Independent Business, testified on the importance of making the 20% pass-through business income deduction (Section 199A) permanent and shared new data detailing the critical impact the deduction’s looming expiration will have on the small business economy if Congress fails to act. (Brabant Testimony)
  • Republicans also pushed back on potential changes to estate taxes, including lowering exemptions or eliminating stepped-up basis, which they argue would hurt family-owned businesses. (Bloomberg, Sept. 12)
  • Speaking on the consequences of eliminating stepped-up basis on small businesses, Brabant said, “If you get rid of stepped-up basis and you have an increase in the death tax, you’re looking at a double death tax. Our members who are nearing retirement, this is a critical issue for them. The concern for the small business sector is, often these small businesses are selling these businesses—because they can’t afford to pay these taxes—to larger businesses that don’t have the same footprint in these same small rural communities.”

199A Coalition

  • The Roundtable is a founding member of the newly formed PROTECT Coalition, an alliance of small, medium and large pass-through businesses and industries that oppose the expiration of Section 199A. (Politico, Sept. 5)
  • The coalition’s mission is to defend vital tax incentives that support the growth and sustainability of successful entrepreneurial businesses across the nation.
  • The Real Estate Roundtable’s SVP & Counsel Ryan McCormick said, “Over four million businesses, including two million in real estate, are organized as partnerships. Section 199A was enacted to ensure that these entrepreneurial businesses could compete on a level playing field with large corporations. Permanently extending Section 199A will allow partnerships and other pass-through businesses to continue advancing careers, investing in communities, and expanding economic opportunity for all.”

What’s Next

  • The TCJA expiration looms large, with both parties framing the debate around small businesses, working families, and economic growth. Republicans argue that letting it expire would stifle economic activity, while Democrats are focused on shifting more of the tax burden on higher-income earners.
  • Next week, on September 18 at 2:00 PM EDT, the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Policy, chaired by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) will hold a hearing on the macroeconomic impacts of potential tax reform in 2025.

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) will continue to closely track ongoing tax debates in Congress.

House Republicans Reintroduce Bill to Make TCJA Deductions and SALT Cap Permanent

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Vern Buchanan (R-FL)Tax provisions affecting individuals and small businesses originally enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017—along with the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap—would be made permanent under legislation reintroduced this month by House Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Vern Buchanan (R-FL), above. (The Bond Buyer, Feb. 13 and Legislative Text)

The TCJA Permanency Act

  • Buchanan’s bill (H.R.976) includes a Roundtable-supported provision to make permanent the 20 percent deduction for qualified pass-through business income (Section 199A). The legislation would also permanently lower tax rates for individuals and families and maintain the higher standard deduction.
  • There are currently 83 co-sponsors of The TCJA Permanency Act. Buchanan has led five of the six Ways and Means Subcommittees and currently sits on the Joint Committee on Taxation, a small group of the most senior tax policy writers in Congress. (Buchanan news release, Feb. 13)
  • Without Congressional action, 23 different provisions of the 2017 Republican tax law are set to expire after 2025, including the SALT deduction cap. Buchanan originally filed legislation to make the TCJA cuts permanent last September during the Democratic-controlled 117th Congress.
  • Buchanan stated that funding for the Federal Aviation Administration could be a legislative vehicle to attach the TCJA bill, since no major standalone tax bills are expected this year. (BGov, Feb. 23)

SALT Caucus Relaunched

SALT Caucus 2023

  • ​More than 20 members of the House relaunched the SALT Caucus this month as part of their push to repeal the $10,000 cap limit on the federal deduction for state and local taxes. (News conference video, Feb. 8 and Tax Notes, Feb. 9)
  • The cap is scheduled to sunset after 2025, but SALT caucus members want relief sooner while pledging to fight attempts to extend the cap. (Rep. Gottheimer news release, Feb. 9)
  • “I like the odds of having a bunch of new Republicans from states that need to restore SALT,” said SALT Caucus Co-Chair Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ). “So if you want to talk, this is the caucus to talk to to get this done, to restore SALT and make life more affordable.” (Roll Call, Feb. 8)

More than 30 states and local jurisdictions have enacted a SALT workaround for pass-through businesses, S-corporations, and some LLCs. (CNBC video Feb. 13)

#  #  #

Senate Republicans Propose Middle-Class Tax Relief, Financed by SALT Cap Extension

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Capitol dome side flag overcast

Congressional Republicans this week proposed legislative measures—aimed at helping middle-class savers and spurring investment without further increasing inflation—as a precursor of GOP economic policies that may be promoted during the fall’s midterm elections. Senate and House announcements on inflation followed last week’s Labor Department report showing the consumer price index reached 8.6 percent in May. In response, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates  by 75 basis points, its largest hike since 1994. (Wall Street Journal and Tax Notes, June 14 | CNBC, June 15) 

Senate GOP Proposal 

  • This week, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), John Barrasso (R-WY), Steve Daines (R-MT), and James Lankford (R-OK) introduced the Middle-Class Savings and Investment Act.  The legislation aims to help the middle class through tax cuts and savings incentives, paid for by extending the current $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes. (Sen. Grassley news release, June 14) 
  • The Republican-introduced bill would:
    • Expand the Zero Rate Bracket for Capital Gains and Dividend IncomeThe legislation would increase the size of the zero percent tax bracket for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. Under the proposal, a married couple with income under $178,000 would not owe tax on capital gains and dividend income. 
    • Provide Relief from the Net Investment Tax for a Married CoupleThe legislation would exempt the first $400,000 earned by a married couple from the 3.8 percent net investment income tax that otherwise applies to capital gains, dividends, and passive rental income. Currently, the first $200,000 earned by an individual and $250,000 earned by a married couple is exempt from the tax. 
    • Create and Expand Tax Relief for Interest Income and Retirement SavingsThe legislation would allow individuals to exclude up to $300 ($600 if married) of interest income from taxation. Additionally, the bill would expand the tax credit that encourages low-income taxpayers to contribute to a qualified retirement account. (Backgrounder on the Senate legislation)
  • The bill would be paid for by extending the current $10,000 cap on the deductibility of state and local taxes for three years, or however long is needed. The deduction is scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.  

House Republican Outline 

R Ways and Means Brady graphic

  • On June 14, House Ways and Means Committee Republicans released a one-page document outlining a six-point plan to combat inflation. The GOP calls for repurposing $170 billion in unspent pandemic federal aid for deficit reduction while pursuing permanent tax relief. The list of principles also urges policymakers to reject the Biden administration’s proposed overhaul of the tax code affecting corporations and wealthy individuals. (BGov, June 15)
  • The proposals to fight inflation by congressional Republicans seek to provide a contrast to the approach by Democrats, which includes cutting prescription drug costs and increasing taxes on oil company profits. (PoliticoPro, June 14) 

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) met today in conjunction with The Roundtable’s 2022 Annual Meeting to discuss policy issues affecting the taxation of commercial real estate. (See story above). 

#  #  # 

State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction Relief in Doubt as Democrats Seek to Narrow Build Back Better Act

Posted on by Trey Jackson

SALT by congressional district - CRS image

Several Democratic Senators favor retaining current law as it relates to the deductibility of state and local taxes and eliminating SALT relief from any pared down version of the Build Back Better (BBB) Act, The Hill reported on Jan. 26. 

SALT Fix

  • Speaking both on the record and anonymously to The Hill, policymakers said that they expect proposed changes to SALT will be cut from the next generation of the BBB Act, despite the issue being a top priority of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
  • The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act limited the itemized, individual deduction for state and local taxes (including property taxes) to $10,000. The provision does not restrict the deductibility of business taxes paid or incurred at the entity level. The limitation expires after 2025. (The SALT Cap: Overview and Analysis, Congressional Research Service, March 6, 2020)
  • Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a key centrist vote in the Senate, has not publicly stated his position on SALT relief, but reportedly has sent signals he is not a supporter. (Politico, Jan. 27 and Roll Call, Jan. 28)

SALT & BBB

Build Back Better phone on map

  • If negotiations resume, congressional Democrats are expected to reduce the size and scope of the BBB Act. Manchin recently said he prefers “starting from scratch” after Democratic negotiations on the House-passed $2.2 trillion package collapsed in December. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 21)
  • There are also challenges in the House, where Democrats have only a four-vote majority. “No SALT, no deal,” wrote New York Rep. Tom Suozzi and New Jersey Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mikie Sherrill in a joint statement last week. “If there are any efforts that include a change in the tax code [in a revised BBB proposal], then a SALT fix must be part of it.” (CNBC, Jan. 21)

#  #  #

President Biden Signals Flexibility on Infrastructure Plan as GOP Senators Craft Alternative Approach; SALT Repeal May Influence Negotiations

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Biden White House Meeting

President Joe Biden this week met with a bipartisan group of policymakers about the details of his multitrillion infrastructure proposal as a bloc of moderate GOP senators stated they are developing a far less expensive counterproposal that would pare back the definition of what comprises “infrastructure” and fund it with unspecified user fees. (Washington Post, April 14)

  • Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who is involved in talks about an alternative infrastructure plan, said, “The pay-for ought to come from the people who are using it,” suggesting that a transportation mileage charge could be applied to electric vehicle drivers. “Clearly by bringing in additional revenue from actual miles driven is going to create some additional revenue,” Romney said.  (Politico Pro, April 14)
  • Rep. Donald  Payne, Jr., chairman of the House Transportation Subcommittee on Railroads, attended the White House meeting where President Biden said he was “prepared to negotiate” on his new infrastructure-focused economic plan – and expressed support for the Gateway project, a major rail tunnel project between New York and New Jersey. (BGov, April 12)

SALT Caucus

SALT Caucus

  • An effort by members of Congress to repeal the cap on state and local tax deductions (SALT) is adding to the complexity of negotiations over the White House infrastructure proposal. Yesterday, a bipartisan congressional “SALT caucus” was launched to push for the full repeal of the $10,000 limit on state and local deductions, which was enacted as part of the 2017 Republican tax overhaul. (Bloomberg, April 15)
  • It is unclear how many members of the bipartisan caucus would link their support for Biden’s infrastructure proposal, and its increased corporate taxes, to action on the SALT cap.  Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Tom Suozzi (D-NY), who co-chair the SALT caucus, said they “will not accept any changes to the tax code that do not restore the SALT deduction.” (CNBC, April 15)
  • Additionally, several New York Democrats sent a letter to House leadership on April 13 urging for a full repeal. “We will not hesitate to oppose any tax legislation that does not fully restore the SALT deduction,” according to the letter. (BGov and Wall Street Journal, April 13)

Energy-Efficient Buildings

  • The White House’s infrastructure plan and the importance of energy efficient buildings was noted in a recent New York Times interview with White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese.
  • Deese stated during the April 9 Ezra Klein Show (podcast), “… it’s been true for multiple years that energy efficiency upgrades in commercial buildings should just happen, and they’re not.  The built environment and industry get less attention but are extraordinary opportunities. And this [infrastructure] plan has a very significant investment in upgrading buildings and making them more energy efficient.”
  • He added, “The jobs doing that happen all around the country. They’re construction jobs, building trades. A lot of it is actually high-value investment, where providing an incentive could actually unlock a bunch of private capital to invest, particularly in the commercial building space.”
  • Deese is scheduled to participate in next week’s Roundtable Spring Meeting, along with U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. The remote discussions will be available on The Roundtable’s YouTube channel by April 21.

The Roundtable is part of the Build by the 4th coalition, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which encourages the Biden Administration and Congress to pass a comprehensive infrastructure deal by Independence Day 2021.

#  #  #

Treasury Department Clarifies that Partnership-level State and Local Income Taxes are Deductible

Posted on by Trey Jackson
IRS building in Washington DC

The Treasury Department and IRS in a recent notice indicated their intent to issue proposed regulations clarifying that state and local income taxes imposed on, and paid by, a partnership or an S corporation are deductible in computing the partnership or S corporation’s taxable income.  (IRS Notice 2020-75) 

  • The announcement has important implications for real estate and other businesses operating in States with high state and local income tax burdens.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 limits taxpayers’ ability to deduct state and local taxes (SALT) paid at the level of the individual taxpayer to no more than $10,000. 
  • The SALT limitation in TCJA applies to state and local taxes owed on individual wages, as well as state and local taxes paid on business income distributed to partners or S corporation shareholders.  In contrast, state taxes on corporate income remained deductible under the 2017 legislation.  However, prior to Notice 2020-75, it was unclear whether the SALT limitation applied to entity-level income taxes imposed on, and paid directly by, a partnership or S corporation.   
  • The Treasury announcement is an important step towards creating a more level playing field between publicly held C corporations and privately held pass-through businesses.   
  • Over the last three years, several States have modified their tax laws to allow partnerships, S corporations, and LLC’s to pay tax on their business income at the entity level.  States adopting an entity-level tax on pass-throughs include Connecticut, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.  In most cases, the regimes are elective.  (CNBC, Nov. 18) 
  • Uncertainty about the federal tax treatment of these regimes has limited their effectiveness.  That could change quickly with the new Treasury guidance.  Similar legislative proposals are pending in Alabama, Arkansas, Michigan, and Minnesota and more may follow in light of Treasury’s clarification.  Entity-level regimes that comply with the Treasury regulations could help restore SALT deductions for a significant share of pass-through business income. 

Other tax and economic policy issues affecting real estate were addressed this week in a CBRE panel discussion that featured Roundtable Senior Vice President and Counsel Ryan McCormick and other industry experts. (video)

#  #  #