Bipartisan Legislation to Improve REITs’ Flexibility and Competitiveness Gains Traction in the House

A bill to increase the limit on the amount of assets a REIT can own through a fully taxable subsidiary is gaining momentum in the House. The bipartisan measure has picked up 18 additional cosponsors from the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee since its introduction in late August by Representatives Mike Kelly (R-PA) and Brian Higgins (D-NY). (Legislative text of H.R. 5275)

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

  • In 1999, Congress authorized REITs to create taxable subsidiaries (C corporations) that can engage in activities not otherwise allowed at the REIT level. Common activities undertaken by taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs) include services such as landscaping, cleaning, concierge, childcare, and catering, among others. As professional real estate management evolved, the change was necessary to ensure REITs could compete with other full-service real estate businesses.
  • H.R. 5275 would raise the limit on a REIT’s assets attributable to its taxable subsidiary from 20 to 25 percent. The legislation would not change the longstanding REIT income rules requiring that at least 75 percent of the REIT’s total income come from sources like real property rents and interest from real estate mortgages. Similarly, the legislation would not change the REIT asset test, which requires that at least 75 percent of the value of the REIT’s assets consist of real estate, cash, cash items, and government securities.
  • The Roundtable supports the legislation to raise the TRS limitation. The issue is also a tax priority for Nareit, which is leading the outreach effort on Capitol Hill. The current 20 percent limit has created particular challenges for REITs seeking to expand and acquire assets outside the United States, such as digital infrastructure. Raising the threshold to 25 percent would restore the limit to its prior level and allow U.S.-based businesses to continue growing in competitive foreign markets.

The Roundtable and its Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) will continue working closely with Nareit and other industry partners in support of H.R. 5275 as deliberations continue on tax legislation.

#  #  #

The Roundtable Opposes NASAA Proposal Affecting REITS, Multifamily Industry, Capital Formation

NASAA logo border

The Real Estate Roundtable submitted comments today to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) in opposition to proposed rules that would place new restrictions on the market for public non-listed REITs. (Roundtable comment letter and Roundtable Weekly, July 29)

CRE Impact Concerns

  • NASAA’s proposal could have a profound impact on the $20.7 trillion U.S. commercial and multifamily real estate market.
  • These proposed revisions to the NASAA Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts could have the unintended and unnecessary consequence of impeding real estate capital formation, undercutting economic growth, and weakening the strength and stability of U.S. real estate capital markets. (NASAA Request for Public Comment, July 12)
  • The proposed revisions also have the potential to influence other sets of NASAA Guidelines under development, including those for Asset-Backed Securities, Commodity Pools, Equipment Leasing, Mortgage Programs, and Real Estate Programs other than REITs. (NASAA Request for Public Comment, July 12)

NASAA’s Proposed Changes

Modern buildings and American flag

  • Since nontraded real-estate investment trusts are not listed on stock exchanges, investors purchase shares through financial brokers. Federally regulated, public non-listed REITs (PNLRs) raised a record $35.4 billion last year. (Wall Street Journal, Aug. 30)
  • The NASAA proposal would negatively affect publicly registered, non-traded REITs by linking conduct standards for brokers selling non-traded REITs to the SEC’s Best Interest conduct standard.
  • The proposal has four revisions that would affect individual net income and net worth requirements; add a uniform concentration limitation; and include a new prohibition against using gross offering proceeds to fund distributions. (Roundtable Weekly, July 29 and the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives)

Roundtable Response

Jeffrey DeBoer, Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO

  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer, above, emphasized in his letter to NASAA that PNLRs are a growing source of capital for the acquisition and development of affordable housing, commercial properties for small businesses, and other types of real estate that supports economic growth and employment.
  • “The Roundtable encourages NASAA to conduct or at a minimum to address the economic impact of the proposal in its justification before considering adoption,” DeBoer stated. (Roundtable comment letter, Sept. 9)
  • The Roundtable’s letter also notes the proposal would impose arbitrary restrictions that would limit investor choice during a time of stock market volatility and high inflation.
  • The NASAA rules would also negatively impact highly regulated investment vehicles—including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, interval funds, tender offer funds and business development companies.

The Roundtable’s letter concludes by urging NASAA to withdraw their proposal and engage industry participants to craft regulations that will help ensure NASAA’s goals without stifling investment in commercial real estate—nor limit investors’ ability to diversify their portfolios.

#  #  # 

Business Coalition Succeeds in Extending the Comment Period for NASAA Proposal Affecting REITS

NASAA logo border

A coalition of 17 business organizations, including The Real Estate Roundtable, wrote this week to the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (NASAA) requesting an extension of the comment period on proposed revisions to the NASAA Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts.  In response to our coalition letter, NASAA has extended the comment period from August 11 to September 12, 2022. (NASAA extension request, Aug. 2)

The coalition is also preparing to submit a comment letter raising concerns about these proposed revisions to the NASAA Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts. (NASAA Request for Public Comment, July 12)

Proposed Changes

  • The NASAA proposal would negatively impact publicly registered, non-traded REITs by linking conduct standards for brokers selling non-traded REITs to the SEC’s Best Interest conduct standard, according to the coalition letter.
  • Specifically, the proposal has four revisions that would affect individual net income and net worth requirements; add a uniform concentration limitation; and include a new prohibition against using gross offering proceeds to fund distributions. (Roundtable Weekly, July 29 and the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives)

Wide Impact

San Franciso

  • The NASAA rules would also negatively impact highly regulated investment vehicles—including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, interval funds, tender offer funds and business development companies.
  • These investment funds direct long-term capital to geographically diverse opportunities across a range of property types—office, industrial, multifamily, retail, self-storage, medical, and real estate debt—throughout the United States and its territories.
  • The funds would face arbitrary restrictions within the proposal that, if implemented, would limit investor choice during a time of stock market volatility and high inflation.
  • Additionally, the NASAA proposal would affect federally regulated, non-traded REITs— particularly NAV REITs. These investment vehicles are a growing source of capital to the acquisition and development of affordable housing, commercial properties for small businesses, and other types of real estate that support economic growth and employment.

Other Investment Concerns

  • The proposed revisions also have the potential to influence other sets of NASAA Guidelines under development, including those for Asset-Backed Securities, Commodity Pools, Equipment Leasing, Mortgage Programs and Real Estate Programs other than REITs. (NASAA Request for Public Comment, July 12)
  • With the deadline extended to Sept. 12, the coalition is continuing to refine its comment letter and welcomes input from our members.

The Real Estate Roundtable is working with several other organizations on the coalition’s responses to NASAA. Roundtable members can direct their comments and questions to Roundtable Senior Vice President Chip Rodgers or call 202-639-8400.

#  #  #

Proposed NASAA Rules Target REIT Guidelines, May Impact Real Estate Capital Formation

NASAA logo border

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) is seeking public comment on proposed revisions to its Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts. The July 12 proposal would update the conduct standards for brokers selling non-traded REITs with references to the SEC’s Best Interest conduct standard. (NASAA news release, July 12 and Investment News, July 25)

Proposed Changes

  1. Update the conduct standards for brokers selling non-traded REITs by supplementing the suitability section with references to the SEC’s best interest conduct standard.
  2. Update to the individual net income and net worth requirements—up to (a) $95,000 minimum annual gross income and $95,000 minimum net worth, or (b) a minimum net worth of $340,000—in the suitability section, by adjusting upward to account for inflation since 2007.
  3. Add a uniform concentration limitation prohibiting an aggregate investment in the issuer, its affiliates, and other non-traded direct participation programs that exceeds 10% of the purchaser’s liquid net worth. Liquid net worth would be defined as that component of an investor’s net worth that consists of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. [NOTE: There is no carve out for accredited or other sophisticated investors.]
  4. Include, in multiple sections, a new prohibition against using gross offering proceeds to fund distributions, “a controversial product feature used by some non-traded REIT sponsors . . . having the potential to confuse and mislead retail investors.”

Potential Impact

Chicago skyward

  • The proposed revisions have the potential to influence other sets of NASAA Guidelines under development, including those for Asset-Backed Securities, Commodity Pools, Equipment Leasing, Mortgage Programs and Real Estate Programs other than REITs. (NASAA Request for Public Comment, July 12)
  • NASAA works to coordinate state regulation of broker-dealers, investment advisers and securities offerings—including non-traded REITs, which are publicly offered REITs not listed on any exchange.
  • NASAA’s Corporation Finance Section Committee Chair and Ohio Securities Commissioner Andrea Seidt said, “The REIT guidelines have not been updated for more than 15 years and these revisions are long overdue. If adopted, the proposed revisions will make key inflationary adjustments to existing suitability standards and promote uniformity in state concentration limits, both of which are key to limiting retail investor risk.” (NASAA news release, July 12)

Final comments on NASAA’s 44-page request are due by Aug. 11, 2022. The Real Estate Roundtable is working with several other organizations on a coalition response. Roundtable members can direct their comments and questions to Roundtable Senior Vice President Chip Rodgers or call 202-639-8400.

#  #  #