Tag: Carbon Tariff

Trump Executive Orders Push Energy Dominance Agenda

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

President Trump issued executive orders this week for a policy agenda to develop domestic energy supplies, ensure grid reliability, and meet increased electricity demands driven by artificial intelligence (AI).  (AP News, April 8)

Grid Reliability Executive Order (EO)

  • It states that America’s leadership in technological innovation “depends on a reliable supply of energy from all electric generation sources, particularly those secure, redundant fuel supplies that are capable of extended operations.” (Politico, April 8)
  • Building efficiency measures that yield energy savings are also key to relieving electricity grid constraints to accommodate more energy users. RER and a broad coalition of real estate organizations urged heightened focus on efficiency programs by voicing strong support for ENERGY STAR in a recent letter to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. (RW, April 4)

State Overreach EO

  • The EO on “Protecting American Energy from State Overreach” reflects the administration’s view that “American energy dominance is threatened when State and local governments seek to regulate energy beyond their constitutional or statutory authorities.”  (Axios, April 9)
  • Governors committed to reducing the use of fossil fuels and combat climate change within their borders said they were not “intimidate[d]” by the Trump order, signaling likely litigation. (E&E News, April 9; Reuters, April 9)
  • In February, RER submitted a letter to Congress requesting oversight of federal DOE grants that induce states and localities to require all-electric buildings and zero emissions “targets,” through onerous Building Performance Standards (BPS). (RW, Feb. 28)
  • RER’s peer reviewed 20-point policy guide for fair BPS mandates emphasizes that states and localities receiving federal grants should not levy fines on buildings that meet US-EPA and US-DOE high performance industry leadership standards. (RW, Oct. 11)

Tariffs and Energy

  • While the administration’s recent executive orders could bolster grid reliability, the potential for broad tariffs may introduce new costs and complexities undermining energy affordability and infrastructure investment. (PoliticoPro, April 8)
  • Tariffs on critical grid components could exacerbate supply chain shortages and drive up electricity prices. (CNet, April 4)
  • On Tuesday, U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced the latest version of the Foreign Pollution Fee Act (FPFA), a carbon tariff aimed at penalizing imported goods manufactured with higher CO2 emissions than domestic alternatives. (E&E News, April 9)  (Press Release, April 8)
  • Prospects for imminent passage of the FPFA are remote. Yet, the bill signals some interest by Republican Senators to tie climate policy to tariff policy where overseas manufacturers produce aluminum, cement, iron, steel, and glass with higher carbon emissions compared to like-kind U.S. manufactured products. (American Action Forum, April 8)  
  • RER submitted comments on the FPFA in January, raising concerns regarding the impact of a carbon tariff on affordable housing construction, rebuilding after natural disasters, and technical issues on calculating “indirect emissions” associated with product manufacturing. (RW, Feb. 7)

RER will continue engaging with policymakers to ensure federal actions promote reliable, affordable energy without unintended economic repercussions.

White House Imposes Tariffs on China, Delays on Canada and Mexico

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Over the past week, new developments have emerged regarding tariffs affecting China, Canada, and Mexico. As the situation continues to evolve, industry leaders are closely monitoring the status of these executive orders and their impact on affordable housing and the cost of essential construction materials.

State of Play

  • Tariffs on these three nations went into effect on February 1. Currently, tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico are on a 30-day hold, while the additional duties on Chinese goods are in effect. (WSJ, Feb. 4)
  • Shortly after the announcements, President Trump reversed course and paused the tariffs on Mexico for one month following a conversation with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. (ABCNews, Feb. 3)
  • As part of the arrangement reached with the U.S., President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico said her country would deploy to the U.S.-Mexico border 10,000 members of the Mexican National Guard to focus on curbing the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants into the U.S.  (New York Times, Feb. 3)
  • After negotiations, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Trump also agreed to a 30-day pause on the tariffs. Trudeau posted on X that the pause would occur “while we work together,” stating that his government would name a fentanyl czar, list Mexican cartels as terrorist groups and launch a “Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl and money laundering.” (APNews, Feb. 3) 
  • Chinese and U.S. officials have yet to arrive at a similar agreement as Canada and Mexico. Beijing is readying an opening bid to try to head off greater tariff increases and technology restrictions from the Trump administration. (WSJ, Feb. 3)
  • The Customs Tariff Commission of China’s cabinet, the State Council, imposed 15% tariffs on U.S. coal and liquefied natural gas imports, while raising levies on crude oil, agricultural machinery and certain vehicles. (WSJ, Feb.4)

Commercial Real Estate Impact

  • Higher tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum will increase structural material costs, while tariffs on Canadian lumber will impact framing and finishing costs.
  • Additionally, any trade disruptions with Mexico could further strain budgets by limiting access to affordable cement, steel, and glass. (Capright, Feb.5)
  • The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) has raised concerns about how tariffs on materials like Canadian softwood and Mexican gypsum could significantly increase construction costs, thereby raising new home prices. (Axios, Jan. 31)
  • Sixty-four percent of a home’s construction cost is building materials—27% of which are supplied by China, 11% by Mexico and 8% by Canada, according to data from the NAHB. (GlobeSt, Feb. 6) (Bloomberg, Feb.3)
  • Imposing additional tariffs on these imports will raise material costs, ultimately driving up housing prices as the U.S. works to rebuild from natural disasters and address a severe housing supply shortage.

Tariffs and Clean Materials

  • Congressional Republicans have joined Trump in exploring a possible carbon-specific clause in future rounds of tariffs, with the goal being to leverage data showing that the United States produces certain materials “cleaner” than foreign adversaries—namely China—and impose a fee on certain imports.
  • Recently, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) proposed a bill, the “Foreign Pollution Fee Act,” that would impose a “foreign pollution fee” on imported carbon-intensive products—including construction materials. (RW, Jan.17)
  • The Roundtable submitted comments on the Foreign Pollution Fee Act last month. The letter raises concerns regarding the impact of a carbon tariff on affordable housing construction, rebuilding after natural disasters, and technical issues on calculating “indirect emissions” associated with product manufacturing. The letter suggests forward-thinking refinements to the bill’s language.

As attention now shifts towards the new March 1 deadline, The Roundtable will continue to provide updates as the global trade situation evolves.

Incoming Trump Administration Prepares Energy Policy Shift

Posted on by Trey Jackson

This week’s confirmation hearings shed light on the Trump Administration’s ambitious energy agenda, including plans to expand American energy production, streamline project approvals, and explore a carbon tariff on imports. (PoliticoPro, Jan. 16)

“All of the Above” Energy Policy

  • President-elect Trump has prioritized “drill, baby, drill” as a cornerstone of his agenda, emphasizing energy independence and dominance through increased domestic oil and gas production.
  • Chris Wright, the Energy Secretary nominee, told the Senate Energy Committee on Wednesday that he would use the role to “unleash American energy at home and abroad” if confirmed. (Reuters, Jan. 15)
  • Wright said in his opening statement that he would focus on three objectives: removing barriers for energy projects, accelerating innovation by the national laboratories, and advancing U.S. energy domestically and abroad. (Roll Call, Jan. 16)
  • North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, the Interior Secretary nominee, said at his Thursday confirmation hearing that the U.S. must expand domestic energy production and electricity generation to meet growing demand, particularly from AI technologies. (Politico, Jan. 16 | Roll Call, Jan. 16 )
  • Burgum supports an “all-of-the-above” approach that would utilize renewables and fossil fuels.  Trump has also tapped Burgum to lead a White House-based energy council that would coordinate policy across the federal government. (Politico, Jan. 9)
  • Former Representative Lee Zeldin, the nominee for EPA Administrator, said at his Thursday hearing he would work in a bipartisan manner with career staff to fulfill the agency’s mission. (PoliticoPro, Jan. 16 | The Hill, Jan. 16)
  • Zeldin vowed to address climate change without “suffocating the economy,” and committed to private sector collaboration to “promote common sense, smart regulation.” (NBC News, Jan. 16 | Washington Post, Jan. 16)

Carbon Tariff Proposal

  • During his Thursday confirmation hearing, Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent (see Policy Landscape story above) expressed interest in a carbon tariff on imports, suggesting it could be part of a broader Trump administration strategy to raise revenue, counter unfair trade practices, and boost negotiating leverage.
  • Bessent indicated the potential for such measures to align with the administration’s broader trade and economic goals. (PoliticoPro, Jan. 16)
  • Recently, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) proposed a bill, the “Foreign Pollution Fee Act” that would impose a “foreign pollution fee” on imported carbon-intensive products – including construction materials. (E&E News, Dec. 12)
  • The bill’s co-sponsor, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), spoke about the bill at Bessent’s hearing. “If you want to clean up the environment, a carbon fee seems to be a good way to do it, to punish China and India for bad carbon practices,” Graham said. (Politico, Jan. 16)
  • The Roundtable submitted comments today on the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. The letter raises concerns regarding the impact of a carbon tariff on affordable housing constriction, rebuilding after natural disasters, and technical issues on calculating “indirect emissions” associated with product manufacturing.

Other Energy News This Week

  • President Biden issues executive order to advance U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure: President Biden issued an executive order directing agencies to lease federal land for “gigawatt-scale” to support new data center construction. (AP News, WH Press Release, Jan. 14)
  • 179D energy efficiency tax deduction: The Energy Department (DOE) launched the 179D Portal, offering tools for new commercial construction and retrofits to estimate energy savings and qualify for potential federal tax incentives. (DOE Press Release, Jan. 14)
  • California wild fires raise electricity costs: The Los Angeles wildfires, which caused over $250 billion in damages and severely impacted the region’s electrical infrastructure, have driven a nearly 50% increase in California’s residential electricity rates since 2019, raising concerns about the fairness of passing these wildfire-related costs onto customers. (Politico, Jan. 15)
  • Maryland building emissions standards lawsuit: A coalition of trade organizations filed a federal lawsuit arguing that the Maryland Building Energy Performance Standards (BEPS) is illegal because it is “pre-empted” due to its conflict with federal laws. The Maryland law mandates large buildings to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20% within five years and achieve net-zero emissions by 2040. The lawsuit claims the rules exacerbate the housing crisis, strain the power grid, and violate consumer choice. (Baltimore Banner, Jan. 14 | (Baltimore Sun, Jan. 16)