Tag: Capital Gains

Roundtable Offers 2022 Tax Policy Overview in CBRE’s Market Outlook Podcast

Posted on by Trey Jackson

CBRE podcast visual

How national tax policies may affect commercial real estate and the outlook for market sectors were the focus this week of a CBRE podcast, “High Hopes: Why Commercial Real Estate Is Poised for Continued Growth in 2022” that included Roundtable Senior Vice President & Counsel Ryan McCormick. 

Tax Policy Issues  

  • McCormick emphasized that tax increase proposals affecting CRE could receive renewed attention in 2022 if the President, congressional leaders, and key centrist Democrats sit down to renegotiate major elements of the Build Back Better Act. (CBRE Podcast, Jan. 11)
  • “We started last year with a tremendous amount of potential change on the table, potential risks for real estate,” including “changes to the taxation of capital investment, capital formation, capital gains . . . pass-through rates and just rates generally,” McCormick noted.  In his initial budget, the President proposed “limiting like-kind exchanges, eliminating the step-up in basis of assets at death, and other changes,” he added.
  • As the process unfolded, according to McCormick, the real estate industry was able to demonstrate the negative impact these proposals “would have on not just real estate in particular, but local communities, local governments, property tax revenue at the state and local level and the jobs that flow from those industries and those services that are provided.” (CBRE Podcast, Jan. 11)
  • Congressional lawmakers, driven by the need to get the key approval vote of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) in an evenly divided Senate, are likely to pare back the cost of the $1.75 billion BBB bill to restart negotiations.  (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 7)
  • McCormick added, “The Build Back Better Act is hanging by a thread at this point, and it’s really going back to the drawing board. . . .  There’s a lot of different ways and directions things could take.  They could go small.  They could try to do something on a bipartisan basis.  I think the most likely scenario is they whittle back the Build Back Better Act further from where it is today. . . . [I]n many respects, we’re back where we started in 2021.”  

The SEC, OZs and SALT 

construction crane city background

  • The discussion also touched on the growing influence of ESG factors on the industry, including the expectation that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may release a proposed rule for reporting financial risks related to climate during the first quarter of this year. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 1, 2021)
  • McCormick expressed optimism that political support for Opportunity Zones, which have raised over $75 billion in capital since their enactment in 2017, would grow over time.  The Roundtable and other stakeholders recently urged Congress to extend deadlines for investors to qualify for OZ tax benefits.  On Thursday, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden announced an investigation into the impact of OZs on jobs and investment in low-income communities (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 7; Wyden press release, Jan. 13)
  • The fate of the deductibility of state and local taxes (SALT) was also a topic in the CBRE podcast.  

Roundtable Speakers: Thune, Kerry and Summers 

Senator John Thune (R-SD) at podium

  • Tax policy in the new year will be a focus of The Roundtable’s Jan. 25 State of the Industry Meeting (remote) and its Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) meeting on Jan. 26.
  • Featured speakers at The Roundtable’s business meeting will include: Sen. John Thune (R-SD), the number two position in Senate Republican leadership;

    John Kerry, President Biden’s Special Envoy for Climate and former Secretary of State; and 

    Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and former Director of the White House National Economic Council. 

Looking Ahead 

CBRE-2022-report-cover

  • The Jan. 11 CBRE podcast – moderated by Spencer Levy, CBRE’s Global Chief Client Officer & Senior Economic Advisor and co-chair of The Roundtable’s Research Committee – also featured Richard Barkham, CBRE’s Global Chief Economist, Head of Global Research & Head of Americas Research. Barkham focused on the economic outlook and forecasts for capital markets and individual CRE sectors. (GlobeSt, Jan. 12)
     
  • CBRE’s recently released publication, U.S. Real Estate Market Outlook for 2022, projects a growing U.S. economy will fuel demand for space and increase real estate investment across all property types – despite uncertainty from the omicron variant and other risks. 

The Real Estate Roundtable’s Policy Agenda for 2022, scheduled for release at the end of this month, will address the tax issues above and several more of importance to CRE in the areas of infrastructure, sustainability, capital and credit, and homeland security. 

#  #  # 

Tax Proposals Under Scrutiny as Timetable Moves Up for Mammoth Reconciliation Bill

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The unanticipated commitment by Speaker Pelosi to allow a stand-alone vote on the bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill no later than September 27 has scrambled the Congressional calendar and put increased attention and focus on the potential for major tax changes.

Why It Matters

  • House Leaders are urging committees, including the powerful Ways and Means Committee, to complete their work on the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill by September 15.  Ways and Means Chairman Richie Neal has indicated a formal mark-up could start the week of Sept. 6 and continue 4-5 days.  (E&E Daily, Aug. 25)
  • Accelerating the consideration of the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill may allow its supporters and advocates to retain political momentum for the massive package of social safety net, environmental, tax, and other policies—momentum that could be lost once the infrastructure bill is sent to the President.
  • The shortened timetable, however, puts pressure on lawmakers who are considering complex changes to the tax code that would normally require hearings, extended debate, and substantial vetting.  

Industry Concerns

  • The Real Estate Roundtable has raised concerns regarding a number of proposals in the President’s plan that would raise the tax burden on capital formation, undermine property values and the functioning of real estate markets, and harm the industry’s ability to create jobs and support local communities through property tax revenue.  These proposals include restrictions on like-kind exchanges, an elimination of the reduced tax rate on capital gains, and the taxation of unrealized gains at death.
  • On Tuesday, the accounting industry expressed strong concerns with the President’s proposed changes to capital income. The letter noted that, “[t]he taxation of the capital gains on gift or death in many cases would be the third time that the gain is taxed.”  Imposing immediate tax on transfers by gift or death is an unreasonable requirement when the transfers are non-liquid assets such as real estate, business interests, etc., because it may require the forced liquidation of some or all of the assets transferred,” they continued.    
  • Last Friday, the Tax Foundation challenged the Administration’s claim that their tax proposals would spare 97 percent of small businesses.  The organization analyzed the most recent IRS data and concluded the President’s proposals would reach more than half of pass-through business income (because 54% of pass-through income is earned by taxpayers making more than $500,000).
  • At the same time, lawmakers are mobilizing to ensure that the $3.5 trillion bill includes priorities such as increased investment in affordable housing.  On Thursday, 111 House Democrats led by Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) and Don Beyer (D-VA) wrote to Speaker Pelosi urging that the legislation include a significant expansion of the low-income housing tax credit.

Contact Congress

House Ways and Means Democrats Release Legislative Framework, Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden Will Pursue Capital Gains Changes

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Congressional tax-writing committees this week began unveiling their agendas for the 117th Congress, with Democrats poised to control the majority in the both House and Senate. [Photo: Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR), left, and House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA), right]

  • In the House, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) on Jan. 11 released a 14-page legislative framework describes an agenda to address health and economic inequities in the United States, particularly those rooted in racial disparities. (Ways & Means news release, Jan 11)
  • The framework, entitled “A Bold Vision for a Legislative Path Toward Health and Economic Equity,” lays out the pillars and policy priorities that will steer the committee’s work in the new Congress.  The economic proposals focus on economic justice for workers, economic justice for children and families, retirement security, investment in communities, and environmental justice.
  • The committee’s staff report, “Something Must Change: Inequities in U.S. Policy and Society,” provides key context about committee members’ legislative priorities.
  • Specific proposals in the legislative framework include increasing the supply of affordable housing through the low-income housing tax credit; providing enhanced bond incentives to state and local governments to address environmental stressors; and expanding tax credits for families with children, child care expenses, higher education costs, and more.  
  • Chairman Neal writes in his foreword, “The framework we present here is Ways and Means Committee Democrats’ plan to make our nation a more just and equitable place. Some actions we can pursue almost immediately. Other advancements may take longer to become law. But inaction is not an option. Complacency cannot be tolerated.”

Senate Finance Committee

In the Senate, incoming Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) outlined his tax agenda during a Jan. 13 call with reporters, including plans to move forward with an increase in the corporate tax rate and major changes in the taxation of individual capital gains.

  • Wyden presented and released a detailed white paper outlining his plan to reform the taxation of capital gains in September, 2019.  (News Conference Video, Center for American Progress Action Fund, Sept. 12, 2019)
  • His proposal, entitled “Treat Wealth Like Wages,” would raise the top tax rate on capital gains (currently 20%) and create parity with the tax rate on wages and other ordinary income.  In addition, his plan would impose annual mark-to-market taxation of capital assets for taxpayers above certain income thresholds.  Both proposals represent dramatic departures from existing tax law. 
  • During this week’s press call, Wyden said, “If you are a nurse in America taking care of COVID patients, you don’t get to defer paying your taxes. If you’re a billionaire, you can defer, defer and defer some more and then pretty much never pay any taxes at all.” 
  • A mark-to-mark system would require taxpayers to pay tax on the annual appreciation of capital assets – regardless of whether the property has been sold and cash is available to pay the levy – or impose a “look-back charge” on illiquid assets when a sale occurs or certain revaluation events take place. It could greatly diminish the incentive to start a busines or invest in any asset with a long, productive life. Such a dramatic change in the basic rules for how capital is taxed could have severe unintended consequences for future economic growth and job creation. ( Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 13, 2019)
  • Wyden added he would also pursue raising the current 21% corporate tax rate and change the tax treatment of carried interest.
  • Any tax changes in the Senate will have to advance through a 50-50 chamber. How committees will work through their arrangements and procedures has yet to be determined by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) 
  • More details related to Senate and House leadership positions and their respective committees can be found on JDSupra’s “Welcome to the 117th Congress” (Jan. 8).

Sen. Ron Wyden is scheduled to speak with Roundtable members at the organiation’s upcoming State of the Industry business meeting on Jan. 26. Additionally, The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee meeting will address the 117th Congress’ tax agenda on Jan. 27 (all virtual).

#   #   #

Republican Senators Urge Treasury to Index Capital Gains to Inflation

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Twenty-one Senate Republicans led by Ted Cruz  (R-TX) this week urged Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to use his regulatory authority to eliminate inflationary gains from the calculation of capital gains tax liability.  (Letter to Secretary Mnuchin , July 29)

The Treasury Department may have the legal authority to adopt inflation indexing through regulatory guidance.  The term “cost” in the tax code’s capital gains provisions arguably is ambiguous and not plainly limited to historical cost,   i.e ., the price originally paid for a capital asset.  
  • Capital gains tax is generally based on the difference between the sale price of a capital asset and its original cost, adjusted for certain factors such as depreciation.  Capital gain liability includes an amount that reflects general price inflation, in addition to the true economic gain.  Especially for long-held assets such as real estate, capital gain thus overstates a taxpayer’s economic income.  
  • The Republican Senators’ letter suggests that indexing capital gains for inflation “would unlock capital for investment, increase wages, create new jobs, and grow the economy.”  
  • The Treasury Department may have the legal authority to adopt inflation indexing through regulatory guidance.  The term “cost” in the tax code’s capital gains provisions arguably is ambiguous and not plainly limited to historical cost, i.e., the price originally paid for a capital asset.  
  • Supporters of the proposed plan include President Trump’s National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, who is leading a White House task force examining the proposal. (Wall Street Journal, March 20, 2018) 
  • Stephen Moore, former advisor to President Trump’s 2016 campaign, also recently wrote that President Trump wants to move forward with capital gains indexing.  (Washington Times, July 14, 2019) 
  • However, a 1992 memorandum written by President George H.W. Bush’s administration determined that Treasury did not have the power to index capital gains by regulation. (Justice Dept. Opinion – Sept. 1, 1992).  In contrast, more recent legal analysis has found support in subsequent case law. (Harv. J. Law & Pub. Policy, 2012).  
  • Conservatives such as Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist cite a 2002 Supreme Court decision in a case between Verizon Communications and the Federal Communications Commission to show Treasury can act unilaterally on the issue.  (Americans for Tax Reform – June 26, 2019) 
  • Congressional Democrats have come out strongly against the proposal.  A recent letter to Secretary Mnuchin from 15 Democratic Senators stated, “We urge you to reject reported plans to use questionable authority to – yet again – lavish tax cuts upon our country’s wealthiest, while middle class families and working people continue to see costs rise and wages stagnate.”  (Senate Democratic letter, July 12).  House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) on Wednesday stated, “If the Trump Administration unilaterally changes the capital gains tax structure, it wouldn’t just be bad policy, it would be executive overreach.”  (Ways and Means news release, July 31)   

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR) this week also responded to the proposal, stating, “The Office of Legal Counsel has plainly stated that the Treasury secretary does not have the authority to index capital gains tax rates.”  (Senate Finance news release, July 30).  Wyden added such an action would “absolutely” end up in court.  “We will oppose this strongly, because this is another backdoor effort to flout responsible tax policy,” he told reporters. (TaxNotes, July 31 and New York Times, July 30) 

Real Estate Roundtable Testifies Before Senate on Business Tax Reform

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Rational Taxation of Real Estate Urged to Spur Job Creation, Encourage Business Expansion and Contribute to GDP Growth

WASHINGTON, DC — Real Estate Roundtable President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey DeBoer today testified before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, encouraging modest changes to the current taxation of commercial real estate that would continue to encourage economic growth while cautioning policymakers on specific business tax reform concepts that could cause severe market dislocation.

During today’s Senate hearing on Business Tax Reform, DeBoer testified, “Importantly, commercial real estate markets are largely in balance with supply, only modestly exceeding demand.  Despite our industry’s relative positive health, we know the underlying economy can and should grow more rapidly.”  DeBoer added that The Roundtable is concerned that some concepts under discussion in tax reform are risky, untested and have the potential to cause severe dislocation – not only in real estate markets but in the nations’ capital markets as well.

In his written testimony and his oral statement, The Real Estate Roundtable’s President and CEO addressed specific elements of potential tax reform.  (See Senate Finance Committee webcast and documents at https://www.finance.senate.gov/hearings/business-tax-reform.) Below is a summary of policy issues covered in his testimony:

  • Business interest deduction.  DeBoer noted that interest, the cost of borrowing, is an ordinary and necessary business expense that has always been deductible.  Today, U.S. capital markets are the deepest in the world, but restrictions would deter business formation and expansion.  The impact would fall disproportionately on entrepreneurs and other developers likely to serve small and medium-sized markets.  As interest rates rise, the harm to the economy will grow.
  • Cost recovery / expensing.  Current cost recovery rules need reform, but 100 percent expensing of real estate is a risky and untested proposal.  Accelerated depreciation of real estate in the early 1980s led to tax-driven, uneconomic investment.  Tax rules should reflect the economic life of structures.  Leading research by MIT suggests existing depreciation schedules for real estate are too long.  Shortening depreciation to 20 years would spur sustainable and economically sound investment.   

     

  • Pass-through reform.  U.S. pass-through tax rules create a dynamic, flexible business environment that supports entrepreneurship and productive investment.  Tax reform should provide equitable relief for pass-throughs.  A new, reduced tax rate for pass-through business income should avoid “cliffs”, phase-outs, and carve-outs that discriminate against certain taxpayers and create new economic distortions.    

     

  • Capital gains.  The tax code should encourage entrepreneurial activity and risk-taking through low capital gains rates and continue to recognize that risk can involve more than the contribution of capital.  Reform should also preserve like-kind exchanges, which get properties into the hands of new owners with the time and resources to invest in job-creating property improvements.

     

  • State and local tax deduction.  Tax reform should retain the deductibility of state and local taxes.  Eliminating the state and local tax deduction would undercut the principal source of financing for schools, roads, law enforcement, and other needed infrastructure and public services.

     

  • FIRPTA.  Tax reform should boost job growth and domestic investment by repealing outdated tax barriers to foreign investment in U.S. real estate and infrastructure.

     

  • Infrastructure.  An infrastructure initiative in tax reform is needed to create jobs, reflect the changing transportation needs of Americans and increase productivity, all to benefit the GDP.  

In his testimony, DeBoer said that although tax reform should unleash entrepreneurship, capital formation, and job creation – Congress should also undertake reform with caution, given the potential for economic dislocation and unintended consequences. 

As an example of over-reactive government policies, DeBoer noted past tax reform efforts in 1981 and 1986, which combined, created severe dislocation in real estate markets nationwide; led to job losses and bankruptcies; and contributed to the demise of the savings and loan industry.

The Roundtable’s President and CEO also addressed the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes. “Ending the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes could potentially cause significant issues in our nation’s cities, as some businesses relocate for no reason other than taxes. We urge that this idea be rejected,” DeBoer said.

He also testified about the crucial need to preserve interest deductibility.  “Eliminating or limiting the deduction for interest on business debt would cause great dislocation in capital markets, slow economic activity and lessen the unique importance of America’s capital markets,” DeBoer said.

After noting that commercial real estate markets today are estimated to account for nearly 20 percent of America’s GDP and employ millions of Americans, he added that real estate provides local governments with its largest revenue source and plays a key role in the retirement savings and wealth creation of Americans.  “Properly designed tax reform can spur job creation, encourage more robust business expansion and result in a sustainable increase in GDP,” DeBoer testified.  

#  #  #