Tag: Beneficial Ownership

Treasury Issues Proposed Beneficial Ownership Regulations on Info Retention and Disclosure

Posted on by Trey Jackson
Treasury Building bright blue sky

The Treasury Department issued a set of proposed rules this month that address how government officials could access information about the “beneficial owners” of most corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities created in or registered to do business in the United States. (Fact Sheet, Dec. 15 and Federal Register, Dec. 16)

Proposed FinCEN Rules

  • The Dec. 15 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued by Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) follows a final beneficial ownership rule issued on Sept. 30. The previous rule requires millions of companies to report information about their beneficial owners—persons who own at least 25% of a company or exert significant authority over it—to FinCEN. (Final Rule | Fact Sheet | Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 30)
  • The Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations submitted detailed comments to FinCEN on May 5, 2021 addressing several implementation concerns related to the beneficial ownership registry. (Roundtable Weekly, May 7)
  • FinCEN Acting Director Himamauli Das said, “The beneficial ownership information reporting rule finalized earlier this year is a major step forward in unmasking shell companies and protecting the U.S. financial system from abuse by money launderers, drug traffickers, sanctioned oligarchs, and other criminals.”
  • “In this next step, the proposed rule would provide the highest standards of security and confidentiality while ensuring that the new beneficial ownership database is highly useful to law enforcement agencies in its efforts to combat financial crime.” Das added, “As we drive toward full implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act, we move closer to exposing criminals, corrupt actors, and anyone trying to hide ill-gotten gains in the United States.” (Treasury news release and FinCEN Fact Sheet, Dec. 15)

House Republican Opposition

Rep. Patrick McHenry
  • The Chairman-elect of the House Financial Services Committee, Patrick McHenry (R-NC), above, raised concerns about the proposed regulations, stating that protecting Americans’ financial privacy will be a top priority of Committee Republicans’ oversight and legislative initiatives next Congress. (McHenry news release, Dec. 15)
  • “Today’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued by FinCEN does not prioritize Americans’ financial privacy in the way Congress intended,” McHenry said. “FinCEN must include the appropriate protections to prevent unauthorized access and use of the sensitive information collected under this new regime. Until we see a real effort to protect this confidential information, Republicans remain concerned about FinCEN’s commitment to privacy and civil liberties.”

Corporate Transparency Act

  • This month’s proposed set of rules addresses provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which became law in Jan. 2021, and target tax fraud, terrorism financing, and money laundering. (Tax Notes, Dec. 16)
  • The Roundtable is part of a broad coalition of business trade groups that supports a legal challenge by the National Small Business Association (NSBA v. Janet Yellen), which challenges the constitutionality of the CTA. (Coalition statement of support, Dec. 7 and NSBA’s website on the CTA)
  • The coalition stated, “It is clear whatever marginal benefit the CTA affords law enforcement will be far outweighed by the costs borne by small businesses and their owners.”
  • The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to work with industry partners to address the implications of FinCEN’s proposed rules and the impact it could have on capital formation and the commercial real estate industry. Written comments on the NPRM are due by Feb. 14, 2023.

RECPAC will meet on Jan. 24, 2023 in conjunction with The Roundtable’s State of the Industry Meeting in Washington.

#  #  #

Treasury Issues Final Rule Requiring Disclosure of “Beneficial Owners”

Posted on by Trey Jackson
FinCEN logo

The Treasury Department issued a final rule yesterday that will require millions of companies to report information about their “beneficial owners”—persons who own at least 25% of a company or exert significant authority over it—to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). (Final Rule | Fact Sheet | Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg Law, Sept. 29) 

Who Reports? 

  • Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said, “This rule … will help strengthen our national security by making it more difficult for oligarchs, terrorists, and other global threats to use complex legal structures to launder money, traffic humans and drugs, and commit other crimes that threaten harm to the American people.” (Treasury statement, Sept. 29)
  • The rule will require most corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities created in or registered to do business in the United States to disclose beneficial ownership information.
  • FinCEN notes that the definition of reporting company applies only to legal entities that have 20 or fewer employees and less than $5 million in gross receipts or sales as reflected in the previous year’s federal tax returns. These entities also must not otherwise benefit from the exemptions described in the regulations.
  • Reporting companies created or registered before Jan. 1, 2024, will have one year (until Jan. 1, 2025) to file their initial reports. Those entities created or registered after Jan. 1, 2024, will have 30 days to file their initial reports.

Data Required

FINCEN website
  • The required data about individuals who own, control or create firms will include the name, birthdate, address, and a unique identification number from driver’s licenses or passports—as well as images of the documents. (AP, Sept. 29)
  • Treasury states the database will be available only to law enforcement and government agencies under the CTA’s beneficial ownership information reporting provisions. (Treasury Department, “Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting”) 

Roundtable Concerns 

RECPAC meeting Annual 2022
  • The Real Estate Roundtable submitted comments with other industry organizations earlier this year about CTA’s anti-money laundering regulations affecting real estate transactions. (Industry comment letter and Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 25 | (Coalition letter to FINCEN, Feb. 4)
  • The Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations submitted detailed comments to FinCEN on May 5, 2021 addressing several implementation concerns related to the beneficial ownership registry. (Roundtable Weekly, May 7)
  • Separately, a broad business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable submitted comments yesterday to congressional leaders in opposition to the Establishing New Authorities for Business Laundering and Enabling Risks to Security (ENABLERS) Act.
     
  • The ENABLERS Act would dramatically expand CTA reporting requirements and subject the owners, board members, and senior executives of most businesses and charities to audits. (Coalition letter, Sept. 29) 

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to work with industry partners to address the implications of FinCEN’s 330-page rule and the impact it could have on capital formation and the commercial real estate industry. RECPAC meets on Nov. 2 in New York City. 

#  #  # 

House and Senate to Consider Legislation Targeting Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Assets

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Legislation to strengthen anti-money laundering laws affecting real estate will be introduced soon by House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA), above, following a bipartisan bill targeting U.S. assets of Russian oligarchs that was introduced last week in the Senate. (Politico, April 11 and Senate news release, April 8) 

Beneficial Ownership 

  • In the Senate, the bipartisan “Kleptocrat Liability for Excessive Property Transactions and Ownership (KLEPTO) Act” was introduced by Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Roger Wicker (R-MS). The bill (S.4075) includes:
    • Requirements for the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to mandate disclosure of beneficial ownership information (the identity of the real person behind an entity) for all real estate transactions through legal entities;

    • Requirements for FinCEN to extend anti-money laundering safeguards to the real estate sector;

    • Clarification that any foreign entity that buys or holds real estate in the U.S. should be considered a “reporting company” under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). 

FinCEN Efforts 

FinCEN logo

  • The congressional push to address anti-money-laundering measures in real estate follows FinCEN’s work on anti-money laundering regulations that were proposed long before Russia invaded Ukraine.
  • FinCEN solicited comments on a wide range of questions related to its implementation of the CTA – enacted on January 1, 2021 – that effectively bans the registration of anonymously owned shell companies in the United States. (JD Supra, April 26 and Lexology, April 28) 
  • Ten national real estate industry organizations, including The Roundtable, on Feb. 21 submitted detailed comments to FinCEN on proposed anti-money laundering regulations affecting real estate transactions. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 25)  

Industry Concerns  

  • The Feb. 21 industry letter supports the broad goal of preventing the use of LLCs or any form of real estate to finance illicit acts, money laundering, or terrorism – yet emphasizes that FinCEN should proceed cautiously to not harm legitimate real estate capital flows in the process.

  • The coalition also stated that anti-money laundering rules and requirements should focus on mitigating criminal activity while not burdening legitimate actors with unnecessary or duplicative compliance, which will only increase costs without meaningfully combating money laundering.
  1. Study the commercial and multifamily real estate markets to tailor future regulation to how those markets function;
  2. Leverage the CTA and the beneficial ownership database to reduce the necessary scope of further action; and
  3. Distinguish nonbank commercial real estate lenders from true all-cash transactions.

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to work with industry partners to respond to FinCEN’s proposals. The industry will also continue to support a balanced approach that inhibits illicit money laundering activity while not restricting capital formation or increasing the regulatory burden on real estate. 

 #   #   #

Roundtable, Real Estate Coalition Comment on Proposed Anti-Money Laundering Regulations

Posted on by Trey Jackson

FinCEN logo

Ten national real estate industry organizations, including The Roundtable, on Feb. 21 submitted detailed comments to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on proposed anti-money laundering regulations affecting real estate transactions.

Industry Concerns

  • The industry letter supports the broad goal of preventing the use of LLCs or any form of real estate to finance illicit acts, money laundering, or terrorism – yet emphasizes that FinCEN should proceed cautiously to not harm legitimate real estate capital flows in the process.
  • The coalition also states that anti-money laundering rules and requirements should focus on risk while not burdening legitimate actors with unnecessary or duplicative compliance, which will only increase costs without meaningfully combating money laundering.
  • The coalition letter emphasizes three main recommendations for FinCEN:

    I.)   Study the commercial and multifamily real estate markets to tailor future regulation to how those markets function;

    II.)   Leverage the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and the beneficial ownership database to reduce the necessary scope of further action; and

    III.)  Distinguish nonbank commercial real estate lenders from true all-cash transactions.

  • The Feb. 21 letter notes that the real estate industry supports efforts to provide the law enforcement community with the tools necessary to stop money laundering, terrorism financing, or other crimes. However, the coalition urges that any compliance regime should be structured in a manner that does not discourage CRE capital formation and investment.

FinCEN Comments

Compliance graphic

  • Earlier this month, a coalition of five real estate organizations, including The Roundtable, submitted concerns to FinCEN on a proposed federal registry with beneficial ownership information that would include rules on who must file, when, and what specific information must be provided.  (Coalition letter to FINCEN, Feb. 4)
  • The letter stated the industry supports efforts to eliminate terrorism financing and money laundering and appreciate efforts to protect the U.S. financial system from illicit actors and business entities. However, the coalition also raised concerns about the cost and compliance burden of imposing excessive, unnecessary and/or confusing beneficial ownership reporting requirements on real estate businesses.
  • The Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations also submitted detailed comments to FinCEN on May 5, 2021 addressing several implementation concerns related to the proposed registry. (Roundtable Weekly, May 7)
  • FinCEN has solicited comments on a wide range of questions related to its implementation of the CTA – enacted on January 1, 2021 – that effectively bans the registration of anonymously owned shell companies in the United States. (JD Supra, April 26 and Lexology, April 28)

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to work with industry partners to respond to FinCEN’s proposals. The industry will also continue to support a balanced approach that inhibits illicit money laundering activity while not restricting capital formation or increasing the regulatory burden on real estate.

#   #   #

Biden Administration’s Proposal to Combat Money Laundering May Require New Real Estate Reporting Requirements

Posted on by Trey Jackson

FinCEN logo

The Biden Administration on Dec. 6 announced it is seeking public comment about a proposed anti-money laundering rule that may result in increased reporting requirements about certain commercial real estate transactions. (Bloomberg, Dec. 6 and GlobeSt, Dec. 7)

Impact on Real Estate 

  • The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) this week to seek input on how to craft the new rule. “Broadly speaking, FinCEN has serious concerns with the money laundering risks associated with the commercial real estate sector,” according to the ANPRM. (FINCEN Fact Sheet: Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting, Dec. 7)
  • Two senior administration officials discussed the proposed rulemaking and its potential impact on the real estate industry during a media call on Dec. 6. One official stated, “We’re very focused on asking a number of questions around ways that any approach that we take towards this additional regulation can be used to minimize the regulatory burdens on the real estate sector.” (White House Background Press Call, Dec. 6)
  • The FINCEN initiative is part of a government-wide effort announced by the White House on Monday called the United States Strategy on Countering Corruption. (Washington Post, Dec. 7) 

FINCEN Concerns 

Anti Money-Laundering visual

  • Real estate transactions involving bank loans or other financing are less susceptible to money laundering because regulated financial institutions are required to report suspicious activity to FinCEN. When real estate is purchased with all cash, it can be nearly impossible to trace the beneficial owners behind shell companies often used in the transaction.
  • Currently, title insurance companies are required to report to FINCEN the identities of persons behind shell companies used in all-cash purchases of residential real estate costing over $300,000 that are located in one of a dozen metropolitan areas. (Bloomberg, Dec. 6)
  • Biden administration officials this week said the new rule could expand that reporting requirement beyond existing geographic areas to cover the entire U.S. – and potentially apply a new regulation to commercial real estate. (White House Background Press Call, Dec. 6). 

CRE Industry Response 

  • The Real Estate Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations on May 5, 2021 submitted detailed comments to FINCEN on several implementation concerns related to a proposed federal registry with beneficial ownership information. (Roundtable Weekly, Dec. 9)

The new ANPRM is open for comment until February 7, 2022. A response to FINCEN will be one of the topics discussed on Jan. 25 during The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) meeting in Washington, DC. 

#  #  # 

Real Estate Coalition Weighs In About Proposed Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

Posted on by Trey Jackson

 

FinCEN logo and graphic image

The Real Estate Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations on May 5 submitted detailed comments to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on the development of a new federal registry that will contain beneficial ownership information. 

Corporate Transparency Act 

  • The Roundtable, the National MultiFamily Housing Council (NMHC), National Apartment Association (NAA) and National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) submitted the comments in response to FinCEN’s effort to gather public input on the reporting, maintenance and disclosure of beneficial ownership information. 
  • FinCEN solicited comments on a wide range of questions related to its implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) – enacted on January 1, 2021 – that effectively bans the registration of anonymously owned shell companies in the United States. (JD Supra, April 26 and Lexology, April 28) 
  • The CTA amended the Bank Secrecy Act to require corporations, limited liability companies, and similar entities to report certain information about their beneficial owners (the individual natural persons who ultimately own or control the companies). 

  • FinCEN is required to develop a confidential, secure, and non-public database to maintain the reported beneficial ownership information. This new reporting requirement aims to enhance the national security of the United States by making it more difficult for malign actors to exploit opaque legal structures to launder money, finance terrorism, proliferate weapons of mass destruction, traffic humans and drugs, and commit serious tax fraud and other crimes that harm the American people. 

Real Estate Industry Concerns 

Logos for NMHC-NAA-NAHB-RER

  • The real estate coalition’s extensive comments emphasize, “The scope of the CTA is far reaching and will impact many commercial and residential real estate businesses who are frequent users of the LLC structure for conducting business. If not implemented with a clear set of rules and regulations, the CTA could result in an outcome of confusion, missteps, and ultimately fines on law-abiding businesses.”
  • The coalition’s comments detail “concerns and recommendations for establishing regulations to implement reporting requirements – as well as provisions regarding FinCEN’s maintenance and disclosure of reported information effectively and fairly.”
  • The coalition document addresses several specific implementation issues, including how small companies targeted by the CTA will face compliance burdens. The time-consuming and challenging process of gathering required information on all beneficial owners of a reporting company that may have been created years ago is also addressed. 

Congressional Intent 

  • Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-NC), ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, and Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO), ranking member of the Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions Subcommittee, sent a letter on April 7 to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on the development of the new beneficial ownership reporting regime.
  • The McHenry-Luetkemeyer letter urged Secretary Yellen to adhere to the CTA’s congressional intent by ensuring “the new reporting paradigm is focused on fighting bad actors such as human traffickers, money launderers, and State actors such as China.” The letter also emphasized that FinCEN implement the statute as intended, with a particular focus on minimizing burdens on small businesses while retaining confidentiality, unless disclosure is authorized. 

FinCEN is mandated to issue regulations on the new registry for beneficial ownership information by January 1, 2022 – and specify a subsequent effective date. 

#  #  # 

Industry and Business Coalitions Raise Concerns About Unintended Negative Consequences of Beneficial Ownership Legislation

Posted on by Trey Jackson

As Congress strives to address the challenges of controlling the use of shell companies engaged in money laundering, tax evasion and terrorism financing, a number of legislative proposals are being considered that could impair capital formation and threaten important privacy protections for real estate.  In two recent comment letters (Nov. 6 industry coalition letter and a Nov. 13 broad business coalition letter), The Roundtable and other organizations detail their concerns about the measures. 

  • As stated in the Nov. 6 industry letter to the Senate Banking Committee, “While well-intentioned, we believe the proposals currently under consideration that are designed to increase the transparency of the ownership structure of limited liability companies (LLCs) and real estate transactions would have negative, unintended consequences on the broader real estate market.  Several of these bills would place a significant compliance burden on owners of small businesses classified as corporations and LLCs, subject these businesses to potentially harmful privacy breaches and expose them to excessive and punitive damages.”
  • The letter also states, “While we support efforts to eliminate terrorism financing and money laundering, we remain concerned about the cost of imposing additional beneficial ownership reporting requirements on real estate partnerships and the extent to which these provisions could impair capital formation, threaten important privacy protections and increase compliance burden.”
  • The four specific legislative measures under consideration in the House and Senate are:

* On Oct. 22, the House passed the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 (H.R. 2513) – introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY) – that would shift FinCEN reporting requirements from banks to the business community, requiring every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners.

* Improving Laundering Laws and Increasing Comprehensive Information Tracking of Criminal Activity in Shell Holdings, Illicit Cash Act (S. 2563)

* True Incorporation Transparence for Law Enforcement, TITLE Act, (S. 1889)

* Corporate Transparency Act (S. 1978)  

  • The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (FinCEN) Customer Due Diligence (CDD) rule became applicable on May 11, 2018. The CDD rule requires financial institutions to collect the beneficial ownership information of business customers when they open accounts.  The congressional proposals would attempt to shift the reporting requirements from large banks – those best equipped to handle reporting requirements – to millions of small businesses – those least equipped to handle reporting requirements.
  • A coalition, including The Roundtable, sent a letter June 10 to the committee’s leadership opposing the Maloney-King bill.  “This legislation would impose burdensome, duplicative reporting burdens on approximately 4.9 million small businesses in the United States and threatens the privacy of law abiding, legitimate small business owners,” the letter states.
  • In the Nov. 6 letter from six real estate organizations, concerns about several of the four bills address:

* Unreasonable Lookback Reporting

* Duplicative Reporting

* Unclear Guidance

* Access and Disclosure Raises Privacy Concern

* Notification and Process for Compliance Untested

* Severe and Punitive Penalties

  • In the Nov. 13 letter, the broader business coalition expresses strong opposition to Title IV of S. 2563 – the Senate’s Improving Laundering Laws and Increasing Comprehensive Information Tracking of Criminal Activity in Shell Holdings (ILLICIT CASH) Act – introduced in June by Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Doug Jones (D-AL) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).  (Homeland Preparedness News, June 12).
  • The Nov. 13 letter states, “Under this legislation, millions of small businesses would be required to register personally identifiable information with FinCEN, file updated reports within 90 days of any ownership changes, and file additional updated reports within a year of any ownership information changes, such as an expiration of a passport number or a change in address. Failure to comply with these reporting requirements could result in civil penalties of $500 per day up to $10,000, criminal penalties of up to 4 years in prison, or both.”

The Roundtable is working with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the beneficial ownership issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity, yet not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry.

#  #  #

 

House Passes Beneficial Ownership Bill; Senate Version Faces Uncertain Future

Posted on by Trey Jackson

 

FINCEN logo

The U.S. House of Representatives on Oct. 22 passed the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 (H.R. 2513), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).  The bill – introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY) – would shift the FinCEN reporting requirements from banks to the business community, requiring every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN.

  • A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable sent a letter June 10 to the committee’s leadership opposing the Maloney-King bill.  “This legislation would impose burdensome, duplicative reporting burdens on approximately 4.9 million small businesses in the United States and threatens the privacy of law abiding, legitimate small business owners,” the letter states.
  • The coalition emphasized that it supports the overall goal of preventing wrongdoers from exploiting United States corporations and LLCs for criminal gain.  Yet the coalition letter detailed significant problems with H.R. 2513. (Roundtable Weekly, June 15)
  • In the Senate, the Improving Laundering Laws and Increasing Comprehensive Information Tracking of Criminal Activity in Shell Holdings (ILLICIT CASH) Act was introduced in June by Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Doug Jones (D-AL) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).  (Homeland Preparedness News, June 12)
  • Additionally, a Senate bill addressing beneficial ownership is entitled the True Incorporation Transparency for Law Enforcement (TITLE) Act (S. 1889).  A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable on Oct. 16 sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee leaders strongly opposing the bill.  The letter states, “This legislation would impose duplicative and problematic reporting burdens on millions of small businesses in the United States and would threaten the privacy of law-abiding small business owners.”  (Policy Comment Letter, Oct. 16)
  • The Senate versions have different provisions, have not yet been the focus of a committee hearing, and prospects for a floor vote are uncertain. (BGov, Oct. 22)
  • The White House budget office commented this week that the House measure “represents important progress” but said it must be improved as it moves through the legislative process.  Among the steps recommended by the Administration are “protecting small businesses from unduly burdensome disclosure requirements, and providing for adequate access controls with respect to the information gathered under this bill’s new disclosure regime.”
  • The statement concludes, “The Administration looks forward to continuing to engage in a bipartisan fashion with the House and Senate to address these important issues.”

The Roundtable plans to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the beneficial ownership issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity, yet not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry. 

#  #  #

 

House Committee Passes Beneficial Ownership Bill; Senate Hearing on June 20

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The House Financial Services Committee this week passed the  Corporate Transparency Act of 2019  ( H.R. 2513), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).  The bill  – introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY)  – would shift the FinCEN reporting requirements from banks to the business community, requiring every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN . ( Roundtable Weekly , May 24)

The  House Financial Services Committee this week passed the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 ( H.R. 2513 ), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

  • H.R. 2513 would also mandate that businesses update beneficial ownership information with any changes (home or business address, driver’s license change, change in ownership) within 60 days, and annually for the life of the business.  Failure to comply with these reporting requirements would be a federal crime with civil penalties of up to $10,000 and criminal penalties of up to three years in prison.  
  • A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable sent a letter June 10 to the committee’s leadership opposing the Maloney-King bill.  “This legislation would impose burdensome, duplicative reporting burdens on approximately 4.9 million small businesses in the United States and threatens the privacy of law abiding, legitimate small business owners,” the letter states. 
  • The coalition emphasizes that it supports the overall goal of preventing wrongdoers from exploiting United States corporations and LLCs for criminal gain.  Yet the coalition letter details significant problems with H.R. 2513. 
  • One major challenge is that the legislation would shift reporting requirements from large banks-those best equipped to handle the reporting requirements-to millions of small businesses-those least equipped to handle the reporting requirements. 
  • The coalition also notes the bill presents privacy, data breach and cybersecurity risks for millions of small businesses in the United States. 
  • On May 9, the House Financial Services Committee unanimously approved legislation entitled the “Coordinating Oversight, Upgrading and Innovating Technology, and Examiner Reform Act” or the “COUNTER Act.”  The bill (H.R. 2514) would require financial institutions to determine the beneficial owners involved in certain commercial real estate transactions – similar to a FinCEN Geographic Targeting Order requirement affecting residential purchases. (CQ, May 9 and (Roundtable Weekly, May 24) 
  • The Roundtable also raised concerns in February about beneficial ownership reporting requirements and the potential burdens they place on the real estate industry. (Coalition letter – Feb. 6, 2018).   

The Roundtable will continue to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity but does not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry. 

Senate Hearing on Beneficial Ownership Follows House Committee Action Affecting Corporate Entity Transactions

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A Senate Banking Committee hearing this week on “Combating Illicit Financing by Anonymous Shell Companies Through the Collection of Beneficial Ownership Information” followed recent approval of legislation by the House Financial Services Committee that would affect beneficial ownership requirements for commercial real estate transactions.

Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID)  held a hearing this week on “Combating Illicit Financing by Anonymous Shell Companies Through the Collection of Beneficial Ownership Information.”

  • Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) said in his opening statement that the committee seeks solutions “… to deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism through the use of front companies, shell companies, shelf companies, opaque nominees, and other means to conceal and disguise the true beneficial owners of property and other assets.”
  • The Senate committee held a previous hearing on the subject last November.  Another hearing focusing on industry perspectives is expected in June.
  • Congressional consideration of the beneficial ownership issue comes after the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) amended the Bank Secrecy Act regulations in May 2018.  FinCEN added a Customer Due Diligence rule requiring financial institutions to collect the beneficial ownership information of legal entities with which they conduct commerce. (FinCEN news release, May 2018)
  • In the House of Representatives, the Financial Services Committee considered legislation (H.R. 2514) affecting beneficial ownership during a May 8 mark-up.  (Committee Memorandum, May 3)
  • The committee approved legislation introduced by Reps. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) and Steve Stivers (R-OH) – introduced the “Coordinating Oversight, Upgrading and Innovating Technology, and Examiner Reform Act” or the “COUNTER Act” by a vote of 55-0.   The bill would require financial institutions to determine the beneficial owners involved in certain commercial real estate transactions – similar to a FinCEN Geographic Targeting Order (GTO) requirement affecting certain residential purchases. (CQ, May 9) 

    Congressional consideration of the beneficial ownership issue comes after the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) amended the Bank Secrecy Act regulations in May 2018. 
  • FinCEN’s GTO issued in November 2018 requires U.S. title insurance companies to identify the natural persons behind shell companies used in all-cash purchases of residential real estate.  The purchase amount threshold, which previously varied by city, is now set at $300,000 for each covered metropolitan area.  The GTO also covers certain counties within the following major U.S. metropolitan areas: Boston; Chicago; Dallas-Fort Worth; Honolulu; Las Vegas; Los Angeles; Miami; New York City; San Antonio; San Diego; San Francisco; and Seattle. (Wall Street Journal – Nov. 15, 2018) 
  • Another House Financials Services Committee proposal introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY) was postponed during the May 8 mark-up, yet is expected to be considered in June.  Their Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 ( H.R. 2513) would shift FinCEN reporting requirements on beneficial ownership from banks to the business community.  (CQ, May 9 and May 21) 
  • The Maloney-King legislation would require every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN.  Businesses would also need to update that registration with any changes (home or business address, driver’s license change, change in ownership) within 60 days, and annually for the life of the business.  Failure to do so would result in federal criminal penalties.  However, the bill fails to address the required information and the process for compliance.

The Roundtable has raised concerns about beneficial ownership reporting requirements and the potential burdens they place on the real estate industry. (Coalition letter – Feb. 6, 2018).  The Roundtable will continue to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity but does not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry.