Treasury Releases New Guidance for Emergency Rental Assistance; YIMBY Act Reintroduced

U.S. Treasury Department
US Treasury Department in Washington

The Treasury Department on May 7 issued new guidance for local municipalities administering emergency rental assistance programs, with rules aimed at directly assisting more renters in less time. The rules simplify applications for aid, expand covered costs such as moving expenses and hotel stays, and require programs to help tenants directly even if their housing providers choose not to participate. (New York Times, May 7) 

Distribution Challenges 

  • Congress approved $25 billion of emergency rental assistance in December 2020 under the Consolidated Appropriations Act. An additional $21.6 billion was allocated in March 2021 under the American Rescue Plan Act. The Treasury Department ‘s May 7 announcement releasing the second allocation was accompanied by its new guidance. (National Multifamily Housing Council, May 10)
  • State and local authorities have been overwhelmed with how to allocate the influx of funds, leaving many tenants and housing providers waiting weeks or months for the assistance. (Washington Post, April 8 and Wall Street Journal, April 13)  
  • The nine “enhanced policies” from Treasury aim to ensure that states and localities can move quickly to address the housing affordability crisis wrought by the pandemic. (Treasury’s May 7 Fact Sheet and FAQs on Emergency Rental Assistance)
  • The new guidance comes days after a federal judge overturned the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) eviction moratorium, which is scheduled to expire June 30. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia also issued an order on May 5 that temporarily allows the moratorium to continue while she considers an emergency appeal by the Biden Administration.  (Roundtable Weekly, May 7)  

Rental Assistance Support 

  • The Roundtable is part of a broad real estate coalition that recently urged state, county and municipal officials to distribute the allocated federal funds as soon as possible. (Coalition letter, April 15)
     
  • The coalition letter emphasized the need “to quickly and fully allocate available American Rescue Plan federal funds to provide assistance to renters, consumer-facing small businesses, and impacted industries such as retail, tourism, travel, and hospitality that are having trouble paying rents, mortgages or remaining viable enterprises due to the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

YIMBY Reintroduced 

Window in house. Architectural elements. Construction materials. Building house.
  • The bipartisan “Yes In My Backyard (YIMBY) Act” was reintroduced on May 13 in the House by Reps. Trey Hollingsworth (R-IN) and Derek Kilmer (D-WA).
  • The bill would require local governments applying for federal housing development funds through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to report whether they have enacted policies to reduce counterproductive regulations that may affect affordability. (Hollingsworth news release and text of the bill)  
     
  • The Real Estate Roundtable is one of many organizations that have endorsed YIMBY, which passed the House last year but stalled in the Senate. The Roundtable also urged support for the YIMBY Act in comments filed with HUD in January 2020.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 6, 2020)
     
  • A Senate YIMBY companion bill was also introduced May 13 by Sens Todd Young (R-IN) and Brian Schatz (D-HI).
     
  • “Discriminatory local zoning and land use policies drive up housing costs in communities across America,” said Sen. Young. “These policies exacerbate the housing affordability crisis and stifle the ability of Americans to move to areas of opportunity. My legislation will require cities, towns, and rural areas across America to face this reality under a new level of transparency and encourage them to cut these harmful regulations.” (Sen. Young news release, May 13)
     
  • “The YIMBY Act complements the many pro-housing proposals currently before Congress,” said Mike Kingsella, Executive Director of Up for Growth Action. “The YIMBY Act will empower communities across the country to clear the path for housing that is more affordable, equitable, and sustainable.” (Up for Growth’s YIMBY Fact Sheet)

The Roundtable and its coalition partners will continue to urge lawmakers to pass the YIMBY Act and similar legislation that eases burdensome rules that inhibit affordable housing development.

#  #  # 

Capitol Hill Lawmakers Consider Tax Measures to Finance Infrastructure and other National Priorities

Democratic and Republican policymakers this week debated options for financing new investments in infrastructure and human capital, including tax proposals that could affect commercial real estate and incentives for capital formation.

Stepped-up Basis

  • A May 12 House Ways and Means subcommittee hearing focused on “Funding Our Nation’s Priorities: Reforming the Tax Code’s Advantageous Treatment of the Wealthy.” (Tax Notes, May 13)
  • Several hearing witnesses testified in favor of recent tax proposals to repeal stepped-up basis upon death, including a recent bill introduced by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). (Roundtable Weekly, April 2. Van Hollen news release, March 29 and section-by-section bill explanation).
  • Concerns exist among Democrats about Biden’s tax plans, which range from eliminating stepped-up basis to raising the corporate tax rate and increasing tax rates on wealthy investors. (Washington Post, May 11 and RollCall, May 6)
  • More than a dozen House Democrats sent a May 6 letter to their leadership emphasizing how the elimination of stepped-up basis could threaten farms and family businesses. “Farms, ranches, and some family businesses require strong protections from this tax change to ensure they are not forced to be liquidated or sold off for parts, and that need is even stronger for those farms that have been held for generations,” according to the letter. [Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA) news release and Roll Call, May 6]
  • President Biden backed elimination of stepped-up basis during his campaign. (CNBC, “This is how Joe Biden will tax generational wealth transfer,” March 13, 2020 / CNBCJune 30, 2020 / ABC NewsOct. 8, 2019)
  • The Real Estate Roundtable, along with other members of the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition, recently released a report by EY’s Dr. Robert Carroll, Treasury’s former top tax economist, which found repealing stepped-up basis would result in reduced job growth, lower wages, and a reduction in GDP of roughly $10 billion per-year
  • The EY report, Repealing Step-Up of Basis on Inherited Assets:  Macroeconomic Impacts and Effects on Illustrative Family Businesses, concluded that, “Many family-owned businesses have value tied up in illiquid land, structures, and equipment that may need to be liquidated, or leveraged to finance loans, to pay for the new tax burden at death.”  The one-time capital gains tax could “limit[] the business’ viability as an ongoing concern.”

 Energy Tax Legislation

  • Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) in a May 12 statement said the committee will begin consideration this month of infrastructure and jobs legislation, starting with a markup on energy tax measures. “Following the clean-energy markup, the committee plans to consider additional key pieces of our jobs and infrastructure agenda,” according to the statement. (The Hill, May 12)
  • The Finance Committee on May 18 will hold a hearing entitled “Funding and Financing Options to Bolster American Infrastructure.”
  • Sen. Wyden last month introduced the Clean Energy for America Act, which would revamp tax incentives directed at buildings, electricity and transportation.  (Roundtable Weekly, April 30)
  • Wyden’s bill includes reforms to the 179D deduction for energy efficient commercial and multifamily buildings – with the value of the incentive increasing as more energy is conserved. (Text of the legislation, one-page summary of the bill and a section-by-section summary.)
  • A broad coalition of real estate, environmental, and manufacturing groups led by The Roundtable supports the E-QUIP Act (H.R. 2346), which proposes “accelerated depreciation” for high-performance equipment installed in commercial and multifamily buildings. The coalition is urging Senate and House policymakers to include this measure as part of any “green tax” package that may be folded into larger infrastructure spending legislation. (Roundtable Weekly, April 2)
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer emphasized an important distinction between energy incentives affecting CRE. “The 179D incentive relies on the energy performance of an entire building, without accounting for its age or tenant usage. By contrast, E-QUIP focuses on an individual building’s components – each one capable of contributing to a reduction in overall energy consumption. The E-QUIP incentive would therefore therefore apply to all buildings more efficiently, despite their age or tenant base, and increase energy performance across all asset classes.”

Like-Kind Exchanges

  • Among the many tax issues on The Roundtable’s 2021 policy agenda is the Biden administration’s proposal to cap real estate profits that can be deferred in a 1031 like-kind exchange to $500,000.
  • On May 11, The Wall Street Journal reported on the significant impact the proposal would have on the multifamily market, which utilizes 1031 exchanges as a primary source of capital.  Additionally, the May 7 issue of Realtor Magazine focused on how the 1031 proposal could present adverse consequences for communities and their economic development.  
  • The Real Estate Roundtable, along with 30 other national real estate, housing, environmental, farming, ranching, forestry, and financial services-related organizations, wrote to key policymakers on March 16 to raise awareness of how 1031 exchanges support jobs, economic development, local communities, property taxes, and the supply of rental housing, among other benefits. (Roundtable Weekly, March 19)
  • Between 10-20 percent of all commercial real estate transactions involve a like-kind exchange. The coalition’s letter describes how like-kind exchanges under section 1031 of the tax code helped stabilize property markets at the height of the COVID-19 lockdown, and will continue to facilitate repurposing of real estate assets in the post-COVID economy. 
  • Roundtable Senior Vice President & Counsel Ryan McCormick on May 18 will discuss the economic contributions of like-kind exchanges to the U.S. economy during an Institute for Portfolio Alternatives (IPA) Summit session. 

REITs

  • Reps. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) and Darin LaHood (R-IL) on May 11 introduced the bipartisan Parity for Non-Traded REITs Act (H.R. 3123) to boost investment in commercial real estate and infrastructure. In 2015, Congress increased the amount of equity that a foreign shareholder can invest in a U.S. exchange-traded REIT to 10 percent without generating tax liability under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA).  The Suozzi-LaHood bill would extend the same 10 percent FIRPTA exemption to publicly offered but non-exchange-traded REITs.
  • “Given the current economic environment and the need for additional investment in U.S. real estate, updating existing FIPRTA rules applicable to public non-traded REITs will expand available capital, create parity with exchange traded REITS, and level the playing field for investors – thereby encouraging more foreign investment in U.S. real estate and generating economic and job growth at home,” said Rep. LaHood. (Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, May 7)

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer will discuss the wide-range of tax proposals noted above, and others addressed in the organization’s 2021 policy agenda, during a May 18 Marcus & Millichap webcast, “Tax Reform: a CRE Game Changer?

#  #  # 

President Biden and Congressional Leaders Discuss Path Forward for Infrastructure Legislation

President Biden met with congressional leaders this week to find a path forward on his $2.3 trillion infrastructure-focused American Jobs Plan. Republicans agreed to continue negotiations and develop a pared down counter-proposal that will limit the definition of infrastructure and include specific funding measures. (CNBC and Wall Street Journal, May 12 and The Hill, May 13) 

Negotiations on Scope 

  • Biden’s multitrillion-dollar proposal calls for funding infrastructure investments by raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21% and making other changes to tax laws passed during the 2017 overhaul.
  • “The proper price tag for what most of us think of as infrastructure is about $600 to $800 billion,” McConnell said on May 9. (CBS News, May 10 and Kentucky Educational Television, May 10)
  • Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris on May 12 met with the “Big 4” Congressional Leaders – Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California – to discuss infrastructure proposals. Although both sides remained deeply divided over the scope of an infrastructure package and exactly how to pay for it, some optimistic signs emerged from the meeting. (New York Times, May 12)
  • McConnell commented after the meeting, “We’re not interested in reopening the 2017 tax bill. We both made that clear with the president. That’s our red line.” (Business Insider, May 12)
  • However, McCarthy added, “there is a place where we can find bipartisanship” –  and Pelosi noted, “I feel very optimistic . . . about our ability to pass such a bill, more optimistic now about being able to do so in a bipartisan way. But we’ll see.” (Tax Notes, May 13) 

Republican Counter-Offer

  • Biden and Harris also met on May 13 to discuss infrastructure with a group of top Republican committee leaders, including Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, ranking member on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. (White House Readout of Oval Office Meeting, May 13)
  • During the meeting, Republicans suggested using public-private partnerships to partially cover the costs of funding an infrastructure bill, instead of reversing elements of the 2017 tax bill. (The Hill, May 13)

     


  • Capito commented after the meeting, “I think what he wants to see is ‘OK, I get it you don’t want me to touch the 2017 taxes … well then how are we going to pay for this.’ The [Paycheck Protection Program] was part of the discussion but there were other things discussed.”
  • Capito added, “He asked that we would come back with another offer, with more granularity to it and more details, and so we agreed to do that. Maybe some different numbers too.” (The Hill, May 13)

     


  • The president also met with key Democratic senators, including Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, this week to discuss infrastructure measures proposals.
  • Congressional Republicans are expected to propose their counter-offer for a pared-down infrastructure program next week.

Roundtable Statement

  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer on April 30 issued a statement on funding options for President Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan.  
  • DeBoer noted, “As policymakers consider the options to raise this needed revenue, we strongly urge that the focus be on broad-based tax increases that do minimal damage to job creation, risk taking and entrepreneurial activity. Unfortunately, particularly when considered in total, many of the tax proposals accompanying the American Jobs Plan or American Families Plan would reduce economic activity, impede job growth, and diminish opportunities for startup businesses and those less advantaged. The current law in these areas may be in need of review and reform, but repealing these incentives is simply not wise.” (Full Roundtable statement)

The initial release of President Biden’s American Jobs Plan on March 31 listed several corporate tax revenue measures to offset infrastructure spending. Further details on the Administration’s proposed tax and revenue provisions are scheduled to be released on May 27 as part of the president’s FY 2022 budget proposal. (Reuters, May 13) 

#  #  # 

Congress Reviews Biden’s Multitrillion Infrastructure Proposals

President Biden Speaks at Amtrak Anniversary

Capitol Hill continued to assess President Biden’s “physical” and “social” infrastructure plans this week as Democrats considered how to advance the Administration’s proposals in a narrowly divided Congress. (BGov, May 4)  Photo: President Biden on April 30th discussed his infrastructure proposals during Amtrak’s 50th anniversary.

Infrastructure Negotiations 

  • Biden’s infrastructure proposals include last week’s $1.8 trillion American Families Plan, composed mainly of social spending and tax hikes on wealthy individuals – and his $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan unveiled in March. (Roundtable Weekly, April 30 and Wall Street Journal, April 29).  
  • Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Monday said Republicans are open to funding projects that fit into a much narrower definition of infrastructure, for a much smaller cost, and funded by unspecified fees rather than tax increases. (AP, May 3)
  • “We’re open to doing a roughly $600 billion package, which deals with what all of us agree is infrastructure and to talk about how to pay for that in any way other than reopening the 2017 tax reform bill,” McConnell said.
  • White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on May 5 said Biden plans to meet with key policymakers on his proposals next week, including Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), ranking member on the Environment and Public Works Committee. “The president believes Congress can and should move forward with multiple policies at the same time. And, certainly, that is what is happening on Capitol Hill.” Psaki said. (White House press briefing, May 5 and Transport Topics, May 6)
  • CNBC reported on May 6 how residential and commercial real estate could be affected by Biden’s tax proposals, which would raise capital gains taxes, tax unrealized gains at death with an exception for family-owned businesses, and restrict the use of Section 1031 like-kind exchanges.
  • The Wall Street Journal on May 6 also reported how Biden’s proposal to restrict 1031 exchanges would add another burden on farmers, who have used the provision to relocate operations, diversify crops, and consolidate land holdings. 

Congressional Legislation

Capitol Building with sun

  • This week, Congress considered legislation that would impact issues of interest to commercial real estate, including:
  • The House Energy Committee addressed the CLEAN Future Act (H.R.1512) during a hearing focused on decarbonizing the transportation sector.  H.R. 1512 is a sprawling bill aimed at achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 that contains provisions affecting building construction, operations, and ESG reporting. (Politico, March 3 and CQ NewsReuters, March 2)
  • A May 4 House Financial Services Subcommittee hearing addressed the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). A discussion draft released before the hearing would reauthorize the NFIP for five years, enact reforms to place the program on sound financial footing, institute a cap on premium increases of 9% per year, and forgive over $20 billion in NFIP debt. (Committee background memorandum)
  • In the Senate, legislation is expected to be reintroduced in the next few weeks that would encourage the construction of more energy-efficient new homes and commercial buildings through voluntary “model” building codes. Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and Rob Portman (R-OH) issued a May 3 news release on their plans to reintroduce their energy efficiency legislation. 

House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) on May 6 said she plans to mark up fiscal 2022 spending bills in June, before expected floor votes in July.  Lawmakers would have to finish their spending bills by Sept. 30, when the government’s fiscal year ends, or pass a stopgap measure to avert a shutdown of government agencies. (BGov, May 6)

 #  #  #

Federal Judge Overturns CDC’s National Eviction Moratorium; Justice Department Appeals

Campus sign for U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

A federal judge on May 5 ruled that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) exceeded its authority by issuing its national eviction moratorium, which is scheduled to expire June 30. (New York Times, May 6)

 National Impact 

  • The federal eviction moratorium – originally enacted by Congress more than a year ago in the CARES Act – was extended by both the Trump and Biden Administrations by executive orders to prevent mass evictions in the face of a public health emergency. (BGov, May 5)
  • The 20-page ruling by Judge Dabney Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacates the moratorium on a nationwide basis, yet does not affect similar eviction moratoriums enacted at the state or local levels. (Wall Street Journal, May 5)
  • The order states, “It is the role of the political branches, and not the courts, to assess the merits of policy measures designed to combat the spread of disease, even during a global pandemic. The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium? It does not.” (Washington Post, May 5)
  • The Georgia and Alabama state Realtor associations, along with two housing providers and their property management companies, filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Realtor Magazine, April 29) 

Justice Department Appeal 

Justice Department exterior

  • Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division, stated on May 5 that the department would file an appeal of the decision and an emergency stay of the order.
  • Boynton stated, “The Department of Justice respectfully disagrees with today’s decision of the district court in Alabama Association of Realtors v. HHS concluding that the moratorium exceeds CDC’s statutory authority to protect public health. In the department’s view, that decision conflicts with the text of the statute, Congress’s ratification of the moratorium, and the rulings of other courts.”  
  • Judge Friedrich also issued an order late on May 5 that would temporarily allow the moratorium to continue while she considers the Biden administration’s emergency request. The temporary stay is in place “to give the court time to consider the merits” of arguments from both sides. (BGov, May 6)

Rental Assistance Distribution

Rental Building

  • The National  Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) responded to the ruling: “What has become clear over the course of the pandemic and resulting financial distress is that the best way to keep people in their homes is to provide them the resources necessary to meet their housing obligations and other costs. To that end, lawmakers in Congress fulfilled their responsibilities and passed almost $50 billion in rental assistance, as well as other supports like stimulus checks and extended unemployment benefits.” 
  • Congress has enacted billions in aid to help renters, but state and local authorities are overwhelmed with how to allocate the influx of funds, leaving many tenants and housing providers waiting weeks or months for the assistance.  (Washington Post, April 8 and Wall Street Journal, April 13)
    • The Roundtable is part of a broad real estate coalition that recently urged state, county and municipal officials to distribute the allocated federal funds as soon as possible. (Coalition letter, April 15)
       
    • The coalition letter emphasized the need “to quickly and fully allocate available American Rescue Plan federal funds to provide assistance to renters, consumer-facing small businesses, and impacted industries such as retail, tourism, travel, and hospitality that are having trouble paying rents, mortgages or remaining viable enterprises due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
       
    • The letter adds, “Such assistance would make a big difference in the lives of thousands upon thousands of COVID-19 affected renters and businesses in their cities, counties, and states – and would also provide stability to the buildings and communities in which they live.

    Additional guidance from the Treasury Department on disbursement of federal rental assistance funds is expected this month. 

    #  #  # 

    Real Estate Coalition Weighs In About Proposed Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

     

    FinCEN logo and graphic image

    The Real Estate Roundtable and three other national real estate organizations on May 5 submitted detailed comments to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on the development of a new federal registry that will contain beneficial ownership information. 

    Corporate Transparency Act 

    • The Roundtable, the National MultiFamily Housing Council (NMHC), National Apartment Association (NAA) and National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) submitted the comments in response to FinCEN’s effort to gather public input on the reporting, maintenance and disclosure of beneficial ownership information. 
    • FinCEN solicited comments on a wide range of questions related to its implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) – enacted on January 1, 2021 – that effectively bans the registration of anonymously owned shell companies in the United States. (JD Supra, April 26 and Lexology, April 28) 
    • The CTA amended the Bank Secrecy Act to require corporations, limited liability companies, and similar entities to report certain information about their beneficial owners (the individual natural persons who ultimately own or control the companies). 

    • FinCEN is required to develop a confidential, secure, and non-public database to maintain the reported beneficial ownership information. This new reporting requirement aims to enhance the national security of the United States by making it more difficult for malign actors to exploit opaque legal structures to launder money, finance terrorism, proliferate weapons of mass destruction, traffic humans and drugs, and commit serious tax fraud and other crimes that harm the American people. 

    Real Estate Industry Concerns 

    Logos for NMHC-NAA-NAHB-RER

    • The real estate coalition’s extensive comments emphasize, “The scope of the CTA is far reaching and will impact many commercial and residential real estate businesses who are frequent users of the LLC structure for conducting business. If not implemented with a clear set of rules and regulations, the CTA could result in an outcome of confusion, missteps, and ultimately fines on law-abiding businesses.”
    • The coalition’s comments detail “concerns and recommendations for establishing regulations to implement reporting requirements – as well as provisions regarding FinCEN’s maintenance and disclosure of reported information effectively and fairly.”
    • The coalition document addresses several specific implementation issues, including how small companies targeted by the CTA will face compliance burdens. The time-consuming and challenging process of gathering required information on all beneficial owners of a reporting company that may have been created years ago is also addressed. 

    Congressional Intent 

    • Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-NC), ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, and Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO), ranking member of the Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions Subcommittee, sent a letter on April 7 to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on the development of the new beneficial ownership reporting regime.
    • The McHenry-Luetkemeyer letter urged Secretary Yellen to adhere to the CTA’s congressional intent by ensuring “the new reporting paradigm is focused on fighting bad actors such as human traffickers, money launderers, and State actors such as China.” The letter also emphasized that FinCEN implement the statute as intended, with a particular focus on minimizing burdens on small businesses while retaining confidentiality, unless disclosure is authorized. 

    FinCEN is mandated to issue regulations on the new registry for beneficial ownership information by January 1, 2022 – and specify a subsequent effective date. 

    #  #  # 

    Biden Proposes $1.8 Trillion “American Families Plan” Funded by Tax Increases

    Biden Joint Address to Congress

    President Biden on April 28 outlined a $1.8 trillion American Families Plan that would fund an expansion of government support for child care, education, paid family leave and other “human infrastructure” initiatives through new tax increases. [Full text of the President’s prepared remarks and CNBC, April 29)

    • Biden proposes to pay for The American Families Plan with tax increases on upper-income taxpayers and new tax enforcement initiatives, including significantly higher tax rates on capital investment. Collectively, the Administration claims these changes would raise $1.5 trillion over 10 years. (American Families Plan Fact Sheet)

    Roundtable Response

    Jeff DeBoer RER Meeting

    • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer, above, said,  “President Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan offer very credible initiatives to address some of our nation’s most pressing needs—a modernized infrastructure, a more comprehensive approach to climate-related matters, as well as increased investments in housing, education and child care.”
    • DeBoer also warned, “As policymakers consider the options to raise this needed revenue, we strongly urge that the focus be on broad-based tax increases that do minimal damage to job creation, risk taking and entrepreneurial activity. Unfortunately, particularly when considered in total, many of the tax proposals accompanying the American Jobs Plan or American Families Plan would reduce economic activity, impede job growth, and diminish opportunities for startup businesses and those less advantaged. The current law in these areas may be in need of review and reform, but repealing these incentives is simply not wise.” (Full Roundtable statement)

    Specific Tax Increases

    Oval Office Meeting

    • The tax proposals in the American Families Plan include increasing the top tax rate on ordinary income from 37 percent to 39.6 percent, which would impact single filers with income above about $453,000 and married couples with income above approximately $509,000, a White House official said. (The Hill, April 29)
    • Raising the tax rate on capital gains and dividends from 20 percent to 39.6 percent for households making over $1 million. (Tax Foundation, April 23)
    • Restricting gain deferred through like-kind exchanges to no more than $500,000 per-year. (Wall Street Journal, April 28)
    • Stepped-up basis: Taxing unrealized gains in excess of $1 million ($2.5 million per couple) at death, but with an exception for family-owned businesses passed on to heirs who continue to run the business. (American Families Plan Fact Sheet)
    • Reforming the current tax treatment of carried interest: (GlobeSt, April 29)
    • Expanding the 3.8% Medicare tax on earnings and net investment income to apply to additional activities currently outside the scope of the tax.
    • Permanently extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provision, section 461(l), that restricts the deductibility of active pass-through business losses to $250,000 for an individual or $500,000 for a married couple.
    • Notably absent from the American Families Plan are any proposals related to reinstating the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT).

    What’s Next

    • Several Senate Democrats have signaled they do not support all the tax increase proposals. Sen. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a pivotal centrist lawmaker, along with Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Bob Menendez (D-NJ), members of the Senate Finance Committee, voiced concerns that higher capital gains rates could slow economic growth, according to the Wall Street Journal. 
    • Menendez commented on the proposed increase, “For me, it is what you’re doing, the totality of the package, and how does it affect the ability of growth to continue to take place. That’s how I’m judging it. Right now it seems like a rather high rate to me.”

    President Biden plans to host his first meeting since taking office with House and Senate leaders from both parties on May 12, according to a White House official. (BGov, April 29)

    #  #  # 

    Senate Hearings Focus on Clean Energy and Tax Policy, Climate Bank

    Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR)

    Senate hearings this week indicate that clean energy financing and tax policies considered in the current Congress might significantly affect commercial real estate. (Tax Notes, April 29)

    Senate Finance Focus

    • Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR), photo aboveopened an April 27 hearing by noting how President Biden’s goal of cutting carbon emissions in half by 2030 is driving clean energy policy. Wyden stated, “The reality is, a debate on energy and transportation is largely a debate on tax policy. That puts this committee in the driver’s seat when it comes to job-creating legislation that addresses head-on the existential challenge of the climate crisis.”
    • Sen Wyden also remarked about legislation he introduced last week – the Clean Energy for America Act, which would revamp tax incentives directed at buildings, electricity and transportation. Among other things, the bill would reform the 179D deduction for energy efficient commercial and multifamily buildings – with the value of the incentive increasing as more energy is conserved. (Text of the legislation, one-page summary of the bill and a section-by-section summary.)
    • Committee Ranking Member Sen. Mike Crapo during his opening remarks noted draft legislation that he unveiled the day before with committee member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) – the Energy Sector Innovation Credit (ESIC) Act. ESIC is an incentive that would “target tax credits for innovative clean energy technologies,” Crapo said. (SFC news release).

    E-QUIP Accelerated Depreciation

    HVAC equipment

    • Separately, a broad coalition of environmental, manufacturing, and real estate groups led by The Roundtable supports the E-QUIP Act (H.R. 2346), which proposes “accelerated depreciation” for high-performance equipment installed in commercial and multifamily buildings. The coalition is urging policymakers to include this measure as part of any “green tax” package that may be folded into larger infrastructure spending legislation. (Roundtable Weekly, April 2)
    • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer emphasized an important distinction between the energy incentives affecting CRE. “All building owners are intensely focused on operations and technologies to reduce energy consumption. Yet the policy discussions in Washington frequently don’t reflect the reality of these efforts to make commercial real estate properties more sustainable. It is retrofitting the existing building stock, not new construction, where energy savings and policy incentives are most challenging.” DeBoer said.
    • He added, “The 179D incentive fails to reflect the diverse vintage and tenant base in buildings. The E-QUIP incentive accommodates existing buildings by targeting the addition of high-performance, energy saving components. Combining the two incentives would make most sense.” 

    National Climate Bank

    Senator Chris Val Hollen (D-MD)

    • The Senate Environment and Public Works Climate Subcommittee on April 27 held a “Legislative Hearing on S.283, National Climate Bank Act” focused on how a national climate bank, also known as an “energy accelerator,” would invest in renewable energy technology.
    • Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), photo above, co-author of S. 283 with Subcommittee Chairman Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), testified at the hearing, “… we need a National Clean Energy Accelerator … so we can turbocharge private investment, fortify our energy grid, and create millions of clean energy jobs – including in those communities where fossil fuel plants have closed.”
    • Van Hollen’s legislation is supported conceptually by President Biden’s American Jobs Plan, which recommends a $27 billion “accelerator” financing platform to mobilize private investment into building retrofits and other clean energy projects.

    • White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese recently discussed the creation of a climate bank in an interview with Roundtable President and CEO, Jeffrey DeBoer for The Roundtable’s April 20 Spring Meeting. (Roundtable Weekly, April 23).

    Additionally, the White House on April 27 announced policy actions to advance the expansion and modernization of the energy grid. National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy noted, “After the Texas transmission debacle this winter, no one can doubt the need to invest in our electric grid. The steps that the Departments of Energy and Transportation are taking today, when combined with the grid investments outlined in the American Jobs Plan, will turbocharge the building of major new electricity transmission lines that will generate new jobs and power our economy for years to come.”

    #  #  # 

    Biden Administration Requests Voluntary “Commitments” from CRE Companies to Help Tackle the Climate Crisis

    The White House with Washington Monument

    As part of the roll-out for its American Jobs Plan to invest in the nation’s “physical” infrastructure assets, the Biden Administration is asking real estate companies to make voluntary “commitments” to help reduce the built environment’s carbon footprint.  (Climate Commitment Fact Sheet)

    • The White House seeks three categories of voluntary “commitments” from real estate companies. A fact sheet prepared by The Roundtable provides more details:

    (1)   EV Charging Stations: Commitments to install a significant number of EV charging infrastructure in parking lots, garages, gas stations, and other areas.

    (2)   Clean Power Purchases: Commitments to purchase clean power in amounts that “offset” or “credit” the electricity consumed by an entire or majority of a real estate portfolio.

    (3)   Data Sharing: Commitments for a real estate company to share data on building energy consumption with federal agencies and US-DOE’s national laboratories.

    • Mark Chambers, Senior Director for Building Emissions with the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), outlined these commitments with The Real Estate Roundtable’s Board of Directors on April 20 timed with the Spring 2021 Roundtable meeting. (Roundtable Weekly, April 23).

    White House Recognition

    EV stations CRE

    • Participating companies stepping up to the challenge will be recognized by the Biden Administration.  A small number of commitments, deemed “significant” by the White House and reached within the next 7-10 days, may be showcased on May 17 with Cabinet-level participation at the virtual Better Buildings Summit sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.
    • The Administration’s outreach to CRE is part of a multi-industry push to also enlist the manufacturing, technology, transportation, power generation, and utility sectors as “partners” in tackling the climate crisis. (Forbes, April 29; Reuters, Feb. 3)
    • Over 400+ businesses and investors recently signed an open letter urging the Biden Administration to cut U.S. GHG emissions in half by 2030 (relative to a 2005 baseline).

    Any real estate company interested in exploring a commitment and earning recognition from the White House should contact Mark Chambers directly at Mark.C.Chambers@ceq.eop.gov. The Roundtable can also facilitate connections to the Administration through Duane Desiderio, Senior VP for energy and infrastructure policy (ddesiderio@rer.org).

    #  #  #

    Real Estate Roundtable Statement on President Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan

    (WASHINGTON, D.C.) — “President Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan offer very credible initiatives to address some of our nation’s most pressing needs — a modernized infrastructure, a more comprehensive approach to climate-related matters, as well as increased investments in housing, education and child care.    

    The real estate industry strongly supports bold actions to finance infrastructure needs, expand the economy, and promote job growth, particularly solutions that help keep real estate — which employs over 13 million Americans and provides three-quarters of local tax revenue — in healthy balance.  

    Responsibly financing these, and other, initiatives obviously will require additional tax revenue.   

    Many businesses and communities are still straining to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic. As policymakers consider the options to raise this needed revenue, we strongly urge that the focus be on broad-based tax increases that do minimal damage to job creation, risk taking and entrepreneurial activity.     

    Unfortunately, particularly when considered in total, many of the tax proposals accompanying the American Jobs Plan or American Families Plan, would reduce economic activity, impede job growth, and diminish opportunities for startup businesses and those less advantaged.  

    Eliminating the reward for investing capital, risking personal savings and borrowing, providing construction guarantees, or providing plain old sweat equity would have enormous economic impacts across the country . . . some of which are known, but many of which are unknown and could result in significant unintended consequences.   

    Rewarding risk with a capital gains rate that is lower than the ordinary tax rate, allowing real property to be traded with some tax deferral, recognizing that risks that qualify for capital gains treatment are not just associated with cash investments — together these policies encourage the productive risk-taking that spurs investment in economically struggling communities and more challenging assets, like affordable housing.  

    The current law in these areas may be in need of review and reform, but repealing these incentives is simply not wise.   

    As this important process moves forward, The Real Estate Roundtable will share data, research, and recommendations with the Administration and lawmakers to advance sound tax policy that is fair, productive and provides equal opportunities for all Americans.”

    The Real Estate Roundtable brings together leaders of the nation’s top publicly-held and privately-owned real estate ownership, development, lending and management firms with the leaders of major national real estate trade associations to jointly address key national policy issues relating to real estate and the overall economy.

    #  #  #