Category: Tax Policy

Mnuchin: President Supports Sales Tax for Online Purchases; GAO Study Shows States Losing Billions from Tax-Free Sales

Posted on by Trey Jackson

As expectations grow that the Supreme Court will rule on the issue of state and local taxation of internet purchases by this summer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently testified before two congressional committees about President Trump’s support for an online sales tax.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently testified before two congressional committees about President Trump’s support for an online sales tax.

During a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, Mnuchin addressed taxing online purchases through the Marketplace Fairness Act, stating: “[T]he president fundamentally supports the idea of some type of sales tax across the board … There are aspects of that he likes a lot and he looks forward to working with you and others on it.” (Video of Exchange with Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT), C-Span, Jan. 30) 

At a Feb. 15 House Ways and Means Committee hearing, Mnuchin said the president “does feel strongly” that the U.S. should impose a sales tax on purchases made over the Internet. (Bloomberg, Feb. 15)

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a study in December estimating that state and local governments could have collected an estimated 8 to 13 billion dollars in 2017 if states were given authority to require sales tax collection from all remote sellers. (GAO report, Dec. 18, 2017).  The Roundtable has recommended that sales taxes collected from on-line consumer purchases may provide a reliable source of state and local revenue to help pay for President Trump’s recently proposed infrastructure re-building plan.  (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 26, 2011.)

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., on April 17 to resolve the constitutionality of collecting sales and use taxes that are due on Internet purchases.  The high court is expected to render a decision by the end of June. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 12)

The International Council of Shopping Centers, Investment Program Association, Nareit®, and the National Association of REALTORS® will join The Roundtable on an amicus brief to be filed early next month in Wayfair, urging the Supreme Court to overturn a pair of decades-old opinions prohibiting states from imposing sales and use tax collection obligations on web-based, catalog, and other retailers lacking an in-state physical presence.  The upcoming brief will re-iterate many of the points that the real estate coalition set forth in an initial amicus brief filed last November  (Roundtable Weekly, Nov. 3, 2017.)

Policymakers Pledge to Issue Technical Corrections and Guidance to Implement New Tax Law

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified before Senate and House tax-writers this week about implementation of the new tax law – including needed corrections affecting carried interest limitations and a drafting mistake that subjects qualified property improvements to a 39-year recovery period, rather than 15 years.

Secretary Mnuchin testified on tax issues before the Senate Finance Committee on Feb. 14, followed by his appearance before the House Ways and Means Committee on Feb. 15.

Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) pledged during a Feb 15 hearing to address errors included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97).  Brady stated, “We know that certain parts of this provision are having unintended consequences” and that he was “committed to working with our Ways and Means Members, with Senator Hatch and the Senate Finance Committee, and the Administration and stakeholders to develop the right solution now – one that is thoughtful, carefully crafted, and successful  restoring balanced competition in the marketplace.”  (Brady’s Opening Statement, Feb. 15) 

[Earlier that day, Brady invited input from stakeholders on potential problems and unintended consequences arising from the new tax law. “We expect to develop a punch list of provisions that need to be addressed either administratively or through changes in the code itself,” he said.  (BNA, Feb. 15)] 

During the House hearing, Rep. Jim Renacci (R-OH) explained to Secretary Mnuchin that Ways and Means members are working on a tax reform drafting mistake that should have provided for a 15-year recovery cost-recovery period to qualified property improvements, instead of the 39 year period that was enacted.   

Mnuchin responded to Renacci: “I am aware of the error and it obviously was unintended. We are looking at whether there is anything we can do with regulations. I think it is likely that this is something that may need to be fixed in the bill. We look forward to working with you.” (Ways and Means Committee, Mnuchin’s testimony and hearing video) 

If a focused corrections bill cannot be quickly passed by Congress, policymakers are considering adding a corrections provision to a must-pass spending bill to keep the government funded beyond by March 23.  (Bloomberg Law, Feb. 13) 

Mnunchin also testified during a Feb 14 Senate Finance Committee hearing that Treasury will issue guidance this month regarding new tax laws affecting carried interest. Under the new tax law, investment fund managers and others qualify for carried interest tax treatment after holding assets for three years, instead of one year.  Yet the new law doesn’t apply to S corporations’ carried interest profits. (The Hill, Feb. 14) 

“We will be putting out guidance and regulations to make sure that people can’t abuse the pass-throughs,” Mnuchin testified. “The IRS and [Treasury office of] tax policy intends to send out within the next two weeks guidance that we do believe that taxpayers will not be able to get that loophole by going through [S corporations],” he added.  (Bloomberg, and CQ, Feb. 14) 

In January, The Roundtable wrote to Treasury Secretary Mnuchin  offering several suggestions aimed at ensuring the long-term success of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).  [Roundtable Letter, Jan. 18]

U.S. Supreme Court to Address Marketplace Fairness Issue; Decision Expected by July Regarding Sales Tax Collection on E-Commerce Purchases

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) today agreed to address an issue that has long vexed the retail real estate sector, and deprived states and localities of much-needed tax revenue for infrastructure development and other community needs. The nation’s highest court “granted cert” in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., to resolve the lingering debate over the constitutionality of collecting sales and use taxes that are due on consumer purchases made over the Internet.

  

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.  is the latest judicial vehicle to seek a ruling from the nation’s highest Court to resolve the lingering debate over Internet sales tax collection. The International Council of Shopping Centers, Investment Program Association, Nareit®, and the National Association of REALTORS® joined a November, 2017   amicusbrief ,  above, with The Roundtable.

In Wayfair, the Justices are expected to squarely resolve whether an antiquated legal doctrine known as the “physical presence” test should be overruled.  This test exempts on-line sellers from collecting sales and use taxes under the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause unless they have an actual, physical retail outlet or other footprint in the state where the purchase is made – thus imposing sales tax collection burdens primarily on traditional brick-and-mortar” stores.

A coalition of real estate groups (including The Real Estate Roundtable) filed an amicus curiae brief with SCOTUS last November, urging the Justices to accept the Wayfair case to challenge pre-Internet decisions from 1991 and 1967 (Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois, 386 U.S. 753, respectively). .  (See Roundtable Weekly, Nov. 3, 2017.)  This pair of decades-old opinions prohibits states from imposing sales and use tax collection obligations on web-based, catalog, and other retailers lacking an in-state “physical presence.”

“The direct harm that the [physical presence] rule inflicts on brick-and-mortar retail stores in considerable,” the real estate groups wrote in their brief.  “Local businesses struggle and increasingly fail to compete against online retailers that can offer customers identical goods for what is in effect up to a 10 percent discount.”

The amicus brief explains the “cascading effects” that call for the Supreme Court to revisit Quill and Bellas Hess.  Many brick-and-mortar stores “are integral to the social fabric of their communities,” and losing them because Internet retailers have a competitive tax collection advantage “increases unemployment and creates a sense of dislocation among community residents.” 

The outdated “physical presence” rule also causes “lost revenue from sales, property and income taxes” which “threatens the ability of state and local governments to provide much-needed public services” to their communities, the brief maintains.  Research data from The National Conference of State Legislatures and International Council of Shopping Centers shows that nearly 26 billion dollars in state and local sales taxes from online sales went uncollected in 2015.  (NCSL and ICSC, March 2017)

The Supreme Court is likely to hear oral argument in April and render a decision by the end of June.

Now that the case moves to the merits phase, a number of advocacy groups are expected to filed a second round of briefs urging a more modern, national standard from SCOTUS to reflect the purchasing preferences and habits of consumers this century.  (See SCOTUSblog’s Wayfair page.)  Since the 1992 Quill opinion, technological advances are now available to address the complexity of administering an online sales tax.  Amazon, for example, collects and remits sales tax  for consumer transactions in 45 states and the District of Columbia.

With today’s cert grant, additional briefing on the Internet sales tax issue is expected throughout the winter and early spring.  The high Court is likely to hear oral argument in April and render a decision by the end of June, when it traditionally breaks for the summer.   

The International Council of Shopping Centers, Investment Program Association, Nareit®, and the National Association of REALTORS® joined last November’s amicus brief  with The Roundtable. 

Passage of Tax Legislation Will Boost Capital Investment and Job Creation

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Taxation of Commercial Real Estate Development and Ownership
Will Continue on Economic Basis


(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Real Estate Roundtable President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey DeBoer today applauded congressional policymakers on passage of the most significant tax legislation in more than three decades (H.R. 1).  DeBoer stated:

“By reducing barriers to private sector capital formation and business investment, the tax overhaul legislation passed by the House and Senate this week will boost economic demand and job growth.

As this landmark tax bill heads to President Trump for his signature, The Real Estate Roundtable recognizes the diligent efforts of policymakers on Capitol Hill and in the White House to see this legislation through to the finish line.

Enactment of the bill will ensure that U.S. commercial real estate development and ownership will continue to be in line with the  underlying economics of real estate assets and transactions, thereby avoiding economic distortions. 

By strengthening the overall economy and spurring broad-based growth, this tax bill will allow commercial real estate to continue its role as a principal driver of economic growth and job creation.  The legislation will also allow our industry to put more people to work modernizing and improving existing properties such as office buildings, shopping centers, apartments and industrial properties. These investments will in turn support the industry’s efforts to meet the changing and growing needs of American businesses and consumers.

H.R. 1 also decreases the tax burden on all job-creating business entities, not only C corporations.  By promoting entrepreneurship and productive risk-taking at all business levels, these legislative changes will help accelerate economic growth, lift wages and create jobs.

The Roundtable plans to monitor the economic consequences of this historic tax legislation and provide industry metrics to relevant government agencies as they draft interpretative regulations in 2018.”

#  #  # 

 

House Passage of Tax Reform First Step to Encouraging Greater Job Creation and Economic Growth

Posted on by Trey Jackson

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Real Estate Roundtable President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey DeBoer released the following statement on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed today by the U.S. House of Representatives.

“The Real Estate Roundtable strongly supports the House of Representatives’ effort to kick-start economic growth and job creation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  Today, outdated and overly complicated tax laws are a drag on the broader U.S. economy.  By reducing barriers to private sector capital formation and business investment, tax reforms in the House bill would boost economic demand and job growth.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would reduce the tax burden on all job-creating businesses.  By spurring the overall economy, the legislation would allow the commercial real estate industry to put more people to work modernizing and improving existing properties — office buildings, shopping centers, apartments, industrial properties — to meet the changing and growing needs of American businesses and consumers.

The Act would also ensure that real estate continues to be taxed on an economic basis — avoiding excessive incentives or disincentives that distort markets and economic activity. 

By creating a new 25 percent tax rate for the owners of pass-through businesses — partnerships, LLCs, S corporations, and REITs — the Act would lower the cost of capital and stimulate entrepreneurial activity and business expansion.  Today, pass-through businesses earn over 60 percent of business income in the economy, and over the last 25 years, they are responsible for more than 60 percent of net new jobs in the country.

The reduced pass-through tax rate, as structured in the House legislation, is a powerful provision that should serve as a cornerstone of the final tax bill.” 

As the Senate debate on its own tax reform legislation proceeds, The Roundtable will continue to work with policymakers in anticipation of a final tax reform bill that strengthens the American economy, jobs and future investment.

 

Real Estate Roundtable Testifies Before Senate on Business Tax Reform

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Rational Taxation of Real Estate Urged to Spur Job Creation, Encourage Business Expansion and Contribute to GDP Growth

WASHINGTON, DC — Real Estate Roundtable President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey DeBoer today testified before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, encouraging modest changes to the current taxation of commercial real estate that would continue to encourage economic growth while cautioning policymakers on specific business tax reform concepts that could cause severe market dislocation.

During today’s Senate hearing on Business Tax Reform, DeBoer testified, “Importantly, commercial real estate markets are largely in balance with supply, only modestly exceeding demand.  Despite our industry’s relative positive health, we know the underlying economy can and should grow more rapidly.”  DeBoer added that The Roundtable is concerned that some concepts under discussion in tax reform are risky, untested and have the potential to cause severe dislocation – not only in real estate markets but in the nations’ capital markets as well.

In his written testimony and his oral statement, The Real Estate Roundtable’s President and CEO addressed specific elements of potential tax reform.  (See Senate Finance Committee webcast and documents at https://www.finance.senate.gov/hearings/business-tax-reform.) Below is a summary of policy issues covered in his testimony:

  • Business interest deduction.  DeBoer noted that interest, the cost of borrowing, is an ordinary and necessary business expense that has always been deductible.  Today, U.S. capital markets are the deepest in the world, but restrictions would deter business formation and expansion.  The impact would fall disproportionately on entrepreneurs and other developers likely to serve small and medium-sized markets.  As interest rates rise, the harm to the economy will grow.
  • Cost recovery / expensing.  Current cost recovery rules need reform, but 100 percent expensing of real estate is a risky and untested proposal.  Accelerated depreciation of real estate in the early 1980s led to tax-driven, uneconomic investment.  Tax rules should reflect the economic life of structures.  Leading research by MIT suggests existing depreciation schedules for real estate are too long.  Shortening depreciation to 20 years would spur sustainable and economically sound investment.   

     

  • Pass-through reform.  U.S. pass-through tax rules create a dynamic, flexible business environment that supports entrepreneurship and productive investment.  Tax reform should provide equitable relief for pass-throughs.  A new, reduced tax rate for pass-through business income should avoid “cliffs”, phase-outs, and carve-outs that discriminate against certain taxpayers and create new economic distortions.    

     

  • Capital gains.  The tax code should encourage entrepreneurial activity and risk-taking through low capital gains rates and continue to recognize that risk can involve more than the contribution of capital.  Reform should also preserve like-kind exchanges, which get properties into the hands of new owners with the time and resources to invest in job-creating property improvements.

     

  • State and local tax deduction.  Tax reform should retain the deductibility of state and local taxes.  Eliminating the state and local tax deduction would undercut the principal source of financing for schools, roads, law enforcement, and other needed infrastructure and public services.

     

  • FIRPTA.  Tax reform should boost job growth and domestic investment by repealing outdated tax barriers to foreign investment in U.S. real estate and infrastructure.

     

  • Infrastructure.  An infrastructure initiative in tax reform is needed to create jobs, reflect the changing transportation needs of Americans and increase productivity, all to benefit the GDP.  

In his testimony, DeBoer said that although tax reform should unleash entrepreneurship, capital formation, and job creation – Congress should also undertake reform with caution, given the potential for economic dislocation and unintended consequences. 

As an example of over-reactive government policies, DeBoer noted past tax reform efforts in 1981 and 1986, which combined, created severe dislocation in real estate markets nationwide; led to job losses and bankruptcies; and contributed to the demise of the savings and loan industry.

The Roundtable’s President and CEO also addressed the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes. “Ending the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes could potentially cause significant issues in our nation’s cities, as some businesses relocate for no reason other than taxes. We urge that this idea be rejected,” DeBoer said.

He also testified about the crucial need to preserve interest deductibility.  “Eliminating or limiting the deduction for interest on business debt would cause great dislocation in capital markets, slow economic activity and lessen the unique importance of America’s capital markets,” DeBoer said.

After noting that commercial real estate markets today are estimated to account for nearly 20 percent of America’s GDP and employ millions of Americans, he added that real estate provides local governments with its largest revenue source and plays a key role in the retirement savings and wealth creation of Americans.  “Properly designed tax reform can spur job creation, encourage more robust business expansion and result in a sustainable increase in GDP,” DeBoer testified.  

#  #  #

Roundtable Welcomes New Study Quantifying Vast Economic Benefits of “Like-Kind” Property Exchanges

Posted on by Trey Jackson

(WASHINGTON) The Real Estate Roundtable welcomes today’s release of an economic study that quantifies the vast economic benefits of “like-kind” property exchanges (authorized under Section 1031 of the U.S. tax code), while illustrating the unintended negative economic impacts of proposals to scale back or repeal this nearly 100-year-old tax provision.

Drs. David Ling (University of Florida) and Milena Petrova (Syracuse University), who co-authored the study —“The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate” — based their findings on more than 1.6 million real estate transactions spanning 18 years (1997-2014) and totaling $4.8 trillion (unadjusted for inflation).

“The new Ling-Petrova study demonstrates how critical like-kind exchanges are to the health and vibrancy of real estate activity in the United States,” said Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer. As he explained, “Acquiring and improving commercial real estate requires large amounts of capital, and section 1031 helps real estate businesses grow and expand organically — with less debt. In short, like-kind exchanges allow property owners to put more of their earnings back into the private sector — hiring workers, upgrading and improving properties, and generating much-needed economic activity.”

Like-kind exchange rules allow taxpayers to defer tax when they exchange one property held for investment or business use for other property of a “like kind.” They also contribute to a more dynamic real estate sector by eliminating potential “lock-in” effects (particularly in the case of less-productive assets).

Such exchanges, thus, foster increased investment and reinvestment activity; allow real estate owners to better allocate resources; and decrease debt levels in commercial and multifamily real estate transactions. Additionally, “1031 exchanges” help to safeguard property values — which underlie local government budgets across the country — and help to protect tenants by stabilizing rents.

In a letter to congressional tax-writers in March, The Roundtable and coalition partners asserted, “There is strong economic rationale for the like-kind exchange provision’s nearly 100-year existence in the Code. Limitation or repeal of section 1031 would deter and, in many cases, prohibit continued and new real estate and capital investment.”

As the coalition explained, like-kind exchanges:
  • are integral to the efficient operation and ongoing vitality of thousands of American businesses, which in turn strengthen the U.S. economy and create jobs.
  • facilitate taxpayers’ ability to exchange a property for more-productive property; to diversify or consolidate holdings; and to transition to meet changing business needs.
  • are used by companies large and small in a wide range of industries, using different kinds of business structures.

#   #   #

Roundtable, Coalition Partners Urge FIRPTA Reform as House Tax-Writers Seek Multi-Year Infrastructure Funding Solutions

Posted on by Trey Jackson

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) — In conjunction with a House Ways & Means Committee hearing today exploring long-term funding solutions for the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) — whose latest funding “patch” expires July 31 — The Real Estate Roundtable and a coalition of business and labor organizations urged reform of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) as a “simple, cost-effective” way to “galvanize billions in new private capital for investment in U.S. transportation and infrastructure.”

In a letter submitted for the hearing record, the coalition said the 1980 law “is a major hurdle for the foreign investor seeking to invest in US infrastructure projects.” It also characterized FIRPTA as a “punitive,” “anti-competitive” law that “subjects foreign investment in U.S. real estate or infrastructure to a much higher tax burden than applies to a foreign investor purchasing a U.S. stock or bond, or an investment in any other asset class.”  In some cases, the FIRPTA tax burden is as high as 54.5 percent. [A similar letter is being submitted to Senate tax-writers in conjunction with their scheduled HTF hearing tomorrow.]

In the view of The Roundtable and its coalition partners, any long-term HTF funding bill should include FIRPTA reforms such as those in H.R. 2128 — legislation introduced by Ways and Means Committee members Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Joseph Crowley (D-NY). The “Real Estate Investment and Jobs Act of 2015” would increase (from 5 percent to 10 percent) the ownership stake that a foreign investor can have in a U.S. publicly traded REIT without triggering FIRPTA liability (extending this provision to certain collective investment vehicles); and exempt foreign tax-exempt pension funds from FIRPTA altogether. 

“By providing relief from FIRPTA, the Brady-Crowley bill will spur domestic real estate investment, create jobs and help provide the capital we need to rebuild the nation’s crumbling infrastructure,” said Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer. Since the bill’s re-introduction in April, 31 (of 39) Ways & Means Committee members have signed on as co-sponsors.

Earlier this year, the Senate Finance Committee unanimously passed legislation (S. 915) that contains a significant part of what The Roundtable and its coalition partners are seeking, in terms of FIRPTA reform. Also illustrating the strong bipartisan support for FIRPTA reform, the full House cleared similar legislation in 2010 by a vote of 402-11. 

Because of the close connection between FIRPTA and infrastructure investment, the Administration included a FIRPTA reform proposal in its 2013 Rebuild America infrastructure initiative, and in its last three budget submissions to Congress.