Category: Tax Policy

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Introduces Bill to Tax Carried Interest at Ordinary Income Rates

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR) yesterday introduced legislation to fundamentally alter the longstanding tax treatment of a profits interest in a real estate partnership. 

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR) has introduced legislation to fundamentally alter the longstanding tax treatment of a profits interest in a real estate partnership.

  • The Wyden proposal (detailed summary of the legislation and one-pager) would depart dramatically from prior carried interest legislation by taxing partners before any capital gain or even rental income is generated by the partnership.  For example, it would give rise to large amounts of taxable (but phantom) income for a general partner with a profits interest during the pre-construction and development phase of a real estate project.
  • The legislation would treat a profits interest in a real estate partnership as an interest-free loan from the other partners. The bill would effectively tax the partner with a profits interest annually, at ordinary income rates, on his or her deemed share of the invested capital by multiplying the deemed share by a specified interest rate (9% plus the variable yield on a corporate bond index that is currently 2.93%).  The product would be considered taxable, ordinary income.
  • In addition to taxing partners currently on non-existent, illusory income, in many cases the legislation would not allow partners to recover the taxes down the road if the project ultimately fails to produce a capital gain.  That’s because the losses would be treated as capital losses that generally are nondeductible against ordinary income. 
  • General partners are currently taxed at ordinary income rates on their management fees and other income that is compensatory in nature.  Partners owe tax on any guaranteed payments for services provided.  Under the Wyden bill, however, a real estate entrepreneur would be taxed today on a partnership’s invested capital-capital at risk-irrespective of whether the project will ever generate income.  

  • The  Real Estate Roundtable opposes both Senate and House carried interest proposals. General partners earning a carried interest in a real estate partnership bear significant risks beyond direct capital contributions. These risks can include funding predevelopment costs, guaranteeing construction budgets and financing, and exposure to potential litigation over countless possibilities. 

  • Senator Wyden’s bill came just days after a televised interview in which President Trump indicated he still intends to address the carried interest issue.  (FOXBusiness, May 20).  “If President Trump wants to address carried interest and make the tax code more fair, he’ll be happy to support my new proposal,” said Sen. Wyden. (Wyden news release, May 23) 
  • Other legislative proposals to reform the taxation of carried interest were introduced in March by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and House Ways and Means Committee member Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-NJ).  (News releases: Baldwin and Pascrell)
  • The Roundtable and 13 other national real estate organizations sent a letter to members of the House Ways and Means Committee on March 26 about the adverse impact that the Baldwin-Pascrell legislation (H.R. 1735) would have on U.S. real estate and entrepreneurial risk taking.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 29)  
  • The letter notes how the bill would result in a huge tax increase on Americans who use partnerships in businesses of all types and sizes – and would be particularly harmful to the nearly 8 million partners in U.S. real estate partnerships.  
  • The March 26 letter states, “The false narrative surrounding the carried interest issue is that it targets only a handful of hedge fund billionaires and Wall Street executives.  The carried interest legislation is far broader and would apply to real estate partnerships of all sizes-from two friends owning and leasing a townhome to a large private real estate fund with institutional investors.” 

The Real Estate Roundtable opposes both Senate and House carried interest proposals.  General partners earning a carried interest in a real estate partnership bear significant risks beyond direct capital contributions. These risks can include funding predevelopment costs, guaranteeing construction budgets and financing, and exposure to potential litigation over countless possibilities.

GOP Leaders Considering Legislation to Make Recent Tax Cuts Permanent; House Speaker Paul Ryan Announces Retirement, Endorses Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House and Senate GOP leaders signaled this week they intend to pursue legislation that would make permanent the individual tax provisions enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97) enacted last December (Roundtable Weekly, Dec. 22, 2017)

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), left, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) discussed the impact of  recent tax reform; a possible phase 2 effort; the recent resignation of House Speaker Ryan; and the endorsement of McCarthy as his successor on  CNBC’sSquawk on the Hill  .

Under current law, many of the individual provisions – including the lower effective tax rate on pass-through business income – will sunset after 2025.  Although the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected last week that the tax bill would add 1.9 trillion dollars to the national debt over a decade, making permanent the cuts that lapse after 2025 could add an additional 1.5 trillion over the next decade, according to a Tax Foundation analysis.  (Roundtable Weekly, April 13 and Reuters, April 17)
 
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) on Tuesday said, “We fully intend to make these things permanent, and that’s something we’ll be acting on this year.” (Reuters, April 17).  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) added, “If they are interested in making the individual rates permanent that’s something we ought to take a look at. I don’t know why we wouldn’t want to do that” (Politico, April 17)
 
In addition to making the individual provisions permanent, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) has also floated making immediate business expensing permanent, among other changes. (Bloomberg, March 28 and Miller & Chevalier, DC TaxFlash, April 17)
 
Although prospects for passing what President Trump calls a “phase-two” tax cut bill in the House are possible, a Senate bill would require 60 votes for passage, which Democrats could prevent in the closely divided chamber.  (CNBC, April 5)
 
Brady and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Tuesday discussed the impact of  recent tax reform; a possible phase 2 effort; the recent resignation of House Speaker Ryan; and the endorsement of McCarthy as his successor on CNBC’s Squawk on the Hill .
 
After recently announcing his retirement from Congress when the current legislative session ends in early 2019, Ryan declared his support for McCarthy as the next GOP House Speaker. (Deloitte, April 13 and ABC News, April 13) 
 
The next GOP House Speaker candidate must get 218 votes in a floor vote, which gives the 30-member conservative House Freedom Caucus leverage to propose one of their members for a leadership position.  Such negotiations will be irrelevant if Republicans lose the House in the 2018 midterm elections. (USA Today, April 18)

House GOP Unveils “Tax Reform 2.0” Outline; Capital Gains Indexing Bill Introduced

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) on July 24 outlined a proposed second round of tax cuts to House Republicans, who hope to vote on “Tax Reform 2.0” before the midterm elections..

In an interview with CNBC, Brady expanded on the three core components of the Tax Reform 2.0 proposal.

  • Chairman Brady stated. “With this framework, we are taking the first step to change the culture in Washington D.C. where tax reform only happens once a generation. We plan to work off this framework to build on the growing successes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and ensure this energized economy continues moving forward.”  (House Ways and Means Statement, July 24)
  • In an interview with CNBC, Brady expanded on the three core components of the 2.0 proposal: 
    • making the individual and small business tax cuts enacted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent’
    • promoting family savings through retirement accounts, a new universal savings account, and
    • expanded 529 education savings accounts; and spurring business innovation by allowing new businesses to write off more of their initial start-up costs, and removing barriers to growth.
  • The central feature of the proposal – a permanent extension of tax cuts for individuals – is unlikely to pass the Senate, where it would need Democratic support.  (The Hill, July 24) 

    Senior Ways and Means Committee Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) has introduced legislation (H.R. 6444) to index capital gains to inflation – a proposal that would reduce the tax burden on long-lived assets, including real estate.

  • Although House Republicans aim to vote on “Tax Reform 2.0” legislation in September, a tax technical corrections bill may not be voted on until after the November elections. (Roundtable Weekly, July 20)
  • Meanwhile, senior Ways and Means Committee Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) has introduced legislation (H.R. 6444) to index capital gains to inflation – a proposal that would reduce the tax burden on long-lived assets, including real estate.  An inflation adjustment for capital gains previously passed the House in the 1990s but died in the Senate.  House tax-writers may consider indexing capital gains as part of Tax Reform 2.0.  (The Hill, July 20)
  • Separately, attention this week was focused on a mistake affecting qualified improvement property cost-recovery tax rules. An amendment (# 3597) introduced yesterday by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) to an appropriations bill (H.R. 6147) would correct a drafting error in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that unintentionally pushed the recovery period for property improvements from 15 to 39 years.  As a result of the mistake, businesses across the country are delaying, or significantly reducing, capital expenditures for building improvements, undermining job creation and economic activity. (BGov, July 26)
  • Additionally, the Treasury Department has sent draft regulations regarding the new deduction for pass-through business income to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for formal review.  Under a recent agreement between the two agencies, OMB has 10 days to review the regulations before they are issued, unless the parties mutually agree to extend the review period.  (TaxNotes, July 25)

In January, The Roundtable wrote to Treasury Secretary Mnuchin  offering several suggestions designed to maximize the economic impact of the pass-through deduction and avoid unnecessary disruptions to business activity.  [Roundtable Letter, Jan. 18].

Treasury Issues Regulations on New Pass-Through Business Income Deduction

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of the Treasury on August 8 released guidance on the new pass-through deduction enacted in last year’s tax overhaul bill. 

“The pass-through deduction is an important tax cut for small and mid-size businesses, reducing their effective tax rates to their lowest levels since the 1930s,” said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, above. “Pass-through businesses play a critical role in our economy. This 20-percent deduction will lead to more investment in U.S. companies and higher wages for hardworking Americans.” 

  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed by President Trump in December included a new 20 percent pass-through deduction (section 199A) that can lower the top tax rate on qualifying pass-through business income to 29.6 percent. Such income was previously taxed at a top rate of 39.6 percent.   
  • According to Treasury’s press release, the guidance is intended to: 
    • “Ensure that all small business income below $315,000 for married couples filing jointly (and $157,000 for single filers) is eligible for the deduction”;  
    • “Provide clarity and flexibility for filers over those income thresholds by:  
         • Including ‘aggregation rules’ for filers with pass-through income from multiple sources;… 
         • Issuing guidance relating to specified service, trade or business (SSTB) income above the thresholds, which may be subject to limitation for the purposes of claiming the deduction; and… 
         • Allowing a de minimis exception to avoid unnecessary compliance costs for businesses earning only a small percentage of SSTB income”; and 
    • “Establish anti-abuse safeguards to prevent improper tax avoidance schemes, such as relabeling employees as independent contractors.” 
  • “The pass-through deduction is an important tax cut for small and mid-size businesses, reducing their effective tax rates to their lowest levels since the 1930s,” said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.  “Pass-through businesses play a critical role in our economy.  This 20-percent deduction will lead to more investment in U.S. companies and higher wages for hardworking Americans.” 
  • “The proposed pass-through regulations are a critical step forward in the implementation of tax reform provisions affecting real estate investment, jobs, and economic activity,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO.  “A regulatory framework for the pass-through deduction is necessary to give taxpayers the certainty they need to move forward with new job-creating real estate projects that strengthen and enhance communities.” 
  • The proposed regulations address several issues affecting real estate, such as the ability to aggregate income from multiple real estate partnerships.  Some areas may need further development, such as the rules related to like-kind exchanges. 
  • In January, The Roundtable wrote to Treasury Secretary Mnuchin offering several suggestions designed to maximize the economic impact of the pass-through deduction and avoid unnecessary disruptions to business activity. [Roundtable Letter, Jan. 18].  

The 184-page proposed regulation on the deduction will be formally published in a future edition of the Federal Register. Stakeholders and other interested parties will then have 45 days to submit public comments, followed by a public hearing on the proposed regulation on October 16.

House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) Releases Tax Bill Addressing “Extenders” and Technical Corrections

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House GOP leaders yesterday delayed a vote on a $54 billion dollar tax bill released Monday (H.R. 88) by House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) that includes tax “extenders” and technical corrections of importance to commercial real estate.  (Brady Statement, Nov. 26 and CQ, Nov. 30) 

GOP leaders yesterday delayed a vote on a $54 billion dollar tax bill released Monday (H.R. 88) by House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX), above, that includes tax “extenders” and technical corrections of importance to commercial real estate.  (Brady Statement, Nov. 26)

  • Specific provisions affecting real estate include technical corrections to fix errors in last year’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  The bill would:
  •  
    • shorten the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property, a new category of depreciable property that covers upgrades and improvements to the interior of nonresidential buildings;
    • clarify that the new 20 percent deduction for pass-through business income extends to REIT dividends received by mutual fund shareholders;
    • temporarily extend the expired deduction for energy-efficient commercial building property (Section 179D); and
    • temporarily extend other expired provisions affecting homeowners, such as a deduction for mortgage insurance premiums and a tax exclusion for mortgage debt forgiveness.  (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 19) 
  • In October, The Roundtable along with 239 businesses and trade groups, wrote to Secretary Mnuchin urging the Treasury Department to provide administrative relief from a drafting mistake that increased the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP) to 39 years, instead of 15. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 12)  

It is uncertain when the wide-ranging tax bill will be considered but debate on the legislation may take place next week.  

Senate Democrats, whose support is needed to assure passage of any tax changes before next year, reportedly, “are determined to win concessions in exchange for providing votes to fix errors in last year’s law.  (Wall Street Journal, Nov. 30)  Yet it remains unclear what concessions Democrats are seeking.  When asked about the bill’s prospects in the Senate, Sen Charles Grassley (R-IA), the likely Senate Finance chairman next year, said “Not if brought up separately, only if it’s put in the funding bill.”  (CQ, Nov. 28). 

Lawmakers May Address Tax “Extenders” and Technical Corrections in Lame Duck Session; Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) to Succeed Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) as Chair of Finance Committee

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Congress returned to Washington this week to prepare their lame duck session agenda, which is expected to address a federal government spending bill and possible tax legislation. 

Specific tax policies affecting commercial real estate that may be addressed in the lame duck session include technical corrections to fix errors in last year’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. 
  • On Tuesday, outgoing House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) outlined several tax priorities, including legislation that may address tax deduction extensions and 70 to 80 technical corrections (The Hill, Nov. 13).  “We’re prepared and ready if there’s an appetite to move some of these things and get them off of Congress’s plate this year,” said Chairman Brady. (Tax Notes, Nov. 14) 
  • Specific tax policies affecting commercial real estate that may be addressed include technical corrections to fix errors in last year’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including:
    • the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP);
    • Section 179D reforms to incentivize private sector retrofits for energy efficient building improvements, and
    • other expired provisions affecting homeowners, such as a deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.  (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 19) 
  • In October, The Roundtable along with 239 businesses and trade groups, wrote to Secretary Mnuchin urging the Treasury Department to provide administrative relief from a drafting mistake that increased the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP) to 39 years, instead of 15. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 12) 
  • On Friday, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) announced he would give up his position leading the Senate Judiciary Committee to assume the chairmanship of the Senate Finance Committee when Congress reconvenes in January.  Senator Orrin Hatch, the current Finance Chairman, is retiring after 42 years in the U.S. Senate.  This will be the third time that Sen. Grassley has chaired the Finance Committee, having held the panel’s top job twice in the 2000s. (Bloomberg, Nov. 16)

Congress will return for the lame duck session to address these issues and many more, the week after Thanksgiving.  Roundtable Weekly will resume publication on Nov. 30.

Business Coalition Supports Legislation to Make New Pass-Through Deduction Permanent

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable and a coalition of more than 100 business organizations yesterday sent a letter to Senate and House tax writers supporting legislation that would permanently extend the new 20 percent deduction for qualified pass-through business income. (Coalition letter, April 11)

 

The  Real Estate Roundtable and a coalition of more than 100 business organizations yesterday sent a letter to Senate and House tax writers supporting legislation that would permanently extend the new 20 percent deduction for qualified pass-through business income. 
(Coalition letter, April 11) 

  • Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) introduced the Main Street Tax Certainty Act yesterday (S. 1149) to make the deduction permanent.  The Senate bill mirrors legislation introduced in the House (H.R. 216) by Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and Jason Smith (R-MO).
  • The 20 percent deduction for pass-through business income  (under Internal Revenue Code section 199A) is one of the most important – and complex – elements of the 2017 tax overhaul law.  The deduction was designed to provide relief to the 30 million businesses in the United States that are not C corporations, and thus don’t benefit from the corporate tax cut.  It is currently scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025.
  • The coalition letter states that the House and Senate bills to make the deduction permanent will help ensure tax relief for the millions of employers organized as partnerships, S corporations, and sole proprietorships. “Repealing this sunset will benefit millions of pass-through businesses, leading to higher economic growth and more employment,” according to the letter.
  • The Treasury Department on Jan. 18 issued final regulations and new guidance on the 20 percent deduction.  Proposed regulations issued alongside the final rules ensure that investors who receive REIT dividends indirectly through an interest in a mutual fund are eligible for the pass-through deduction.  (Roundtable Weekly,  Jan. 25, 2019)
  • Yesterday, the IRS released a fact sheet (FS-2019-8) on the new section 199A deduction.  Among the topics addressed are the qualified business income component, qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership (PTP) income. (IRS news release, April 11) 

The Section 199A deduction was a key topic of Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer’s testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in the fall of 2017, shortly before lawmakers released the first version of their tax overhaul. The Roundtable was closely involved in the legislative development of the provision.  (Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 22, 2017) 

Business Coalition Urges Congress to Correct Cost Recovery Period for Nonresidential Real Estate Improvements

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A coalition of businesses and trade groups, including The Real Estate Roundtable, today urged all members of Congress to cosponsor the Restoring Investment in Improvements Act (H.R. 1869 /  S. 803) – a bill that would correct a drafting error in tax reform.  The legislation would give qualified improvement property (QIP) a 15-year depreciation period and restore its eligibility for accelerated bonus depreciation. (QIP Policy Comment Letter, April 26)

 

A coalition of businesses and trade groups, including The Real Estate Roundtable, urged all members of Congress to cosponsor the Restoring Investment in Improvements Act (H.R. 1869 /  S. 803) – a bill that would correct a drafting error in tax reform.  The legislation would give qualified improvement property (QIP) a 15-year depreciation period and restore its eligibility for accelerated bonus depreciation. (QIP Policy Comment Letter, April 26)

  • House Ways and Means Committee members Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) and Jackie Walorski (R-IN) introduced H.R. 1869 on March 26. The Senate bill (S. 803) was introduced earlier in the month by Sens. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Doug Jones (D-AL).  (Roundtable Weekly, March 15)
  • The legislation would correct a mistake in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that lengthened the cost recovery period for QIP, which generally applies to improvements to the interior of existing nonresidential buildings.  
  • The error has resulted in a significantly longer 39- or 40-year cost recovery period.  The intent of Congress was to allow the immediate expensing of QIP – or provide a 20-year recovery period in the case of taxpayers electing out of new limitations on the deductibility of business interest.
  • The April 26 coalition letter to leadership in the House and Senate, as well as leaders of tax committees in both chambers, notes that there is no budget impact to restore the QIP depreciation to 15 years.  
  • Specific examples are offered in the letter to show the negative consequences that the current law is having on QIP investments and commercial renovation projects.  The letter states, “Not surprisingly, it is causing numerous negative ripple effects for individuals and businesses, including on job creation, sales of QIP products and building supplies, property values, building occupancy and rental income, cost-saving energy efficiency gains, and even on fire safety.”
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer said, “The Restoring Investment in Improvements Act would enact an immediate and necessary correction to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  It would reverse an unnecessary drag on building investment, construction activity, and job creation.  Congress should move on this common-sense legislation quickly and reinstate a much shorter cost recovery period for building improvements.” 

In the weeks ahead, the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees may address “technical corrections” to the TCJA, such as the cost recovery period for QIP along with other tax legislative priorities. (Roundtable Weekly, March 29)

Bipartisan FIRPTA Repeal Legislation Introduced

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Bipartisan legislation introduced on April 10 by Reps. John Larson (D-CT) and Kenny Marchant (R-TX) would repeal the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) – a discriminatory capital gains tax on foreign investors in U.S. real estate.  (Legislative text of the Invest in America Act and one-page summary)

This week, Rep. John Larson (D-CT), above, and Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX)  introduced bipartisan legislation, Invest in America Act, that would repeal FIRPTA.

  • FIRPTA’s tax penalty does not apply to any other asset class except U.S. real estate.  The arcane tax, enacted in 1980, discourages capital formation and investment that could create jobs and improve U.S. real estate and infrastructure.  By repealing FIRPTA, the Invest in America Act (H.R. 2210) would unlock foreign capital for productive investment. 
  • Rep. Larson stated, “The American Society of Civil Engineers has given America’s infrastructure a D+ rating. That’s unacceptable. This isn’t a Republican or Democrat issue, this is an American issue. I am proud to introduce the Invest in America Act today with Congressman Marchant to unlock more opportunities to invest in communities in Connecticut and across the nation and to rebuild our infrastructure.”  (Larson-Marchant news release, April 10)
  • Rep. Marchant added, “I am proud to partner with Congressman Larson to introduce the Invest in America Act, which will remove the barriers in our tax code that discourage investments in real estate.  By providing parity to real estate assets under the law, foreign investors will be able to create more opportunities and more prosperity for American families.”
  • The Larson-Marchant bill (H.R. 2210) was introduced with a total of 11 original cosponsors from the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee who represent every major region of the country.  
  • In 2015, Congress passed meaningful reforms to FIRPTA, exempting foreign pension funds and doubling the amount a foreign interest may invest in a publicly traded U.S. REIT.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 18, 2016)

    A  report by the Rosen Consulting Group  (RCG) estimated that FIRPTA repeal would generate an initial increase of between $65 billion and $125 billion in international investment in U.S. commercial real estate.  

     

  • The Real Estate Roundtable and American Institute of Architects released a statement of support for the Invest in America Act yesterday.  RER President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer said, “The FIRPTA regime is an anti-competitive outlier that deflects global capital to other countries.  Our infrastructure challenges demand a holistic approach and innovative solutions. Now is the time to build on the recent success of the 2015 reforms by eliminating FIRPTA outright and unlocking private capital for even more job growth and infrastructure improvements.”
  • The Roundtable and 19 national trade organizations wrote to Ways and Means Committee Members and other key House lawmakers on March 28, urging them to support the Invest in America Act.  (Coalition FIRPTA letter, March 28)

A report by the Rosen Consulting Group (RCG) estimated that FIRPTA repeal would generate an initial increase of between $65 billion and $125 billion in international investment in U.S. commercial real estate. This new level of activity would lead to the creation of 147,000 to 284,000 jobs throughout the economy and increase taxpayers’ income by $8 billion to $16 billion.  (Unlocking Foreign Investment in U.S. Commercial Real Estate, July 2017) 

 

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Correct Cost Recovery Period for Nonresidential Real Estate Improvements

Posted on by Trey Jackson

This week U.S. Senators Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Doug Jones (D-AL) introduced bipartisan legislation, the Restoring Investment in Improvements Act (S. 803), to correct a mistake in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that lengthened the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).  

U.S. Senators Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Doug Jones (D-AL) introduced bipartisan legislation, the Restoring Investment in Improvements Act (  S. 803  ), to correct a mistake in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that lengthened the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).  

  • The unintended drafting error has resulted in a significantly longer 39- or 40-year cost recovery period for most improvements to the interior of nonresidential real estate.  The intent of Congress was to allow the immediate expensing of QIP – or provide a 20-year recovery period in the case of taxpayers electing out of new limitations on the deductibility of business interest.
  • Prior to the law’s enactment, commercial building tenants, retail store owners and restaurant owners could write off the costs of their renovations over a span of 15 years.  The legislation drafted by Sens. Toomey and Jones would allow many businesses to immediately deduct the full cost of interior renovations, and would apply retroactively to January 1, 2018. (The Hill, Mar. 14)
  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act included a strict new limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, but also provided an exception for an “electing real property trade or business.”  In general, taxpayers that develop, rent, manage, or operate real estate are not subject to the interest limits, but are subject to longer cost recovery periods for their real estate and real estate improvements.  The Toomey-Jones bill would ensure that the QIP of an electing real property trade or business is depreciated over 20 years, rather than 40 years.   

  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer applauded the Senators bipartisan legislation introduced this week. “The Restoring Investment in Improvements Act ( S. 803 ) introduced by Senators Toomey and Jones is a simple and straightforward technical correction to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” he said.

    “The Restoring Investment in Improvements Act (S. 803) introduced by Senators Toomey and Jones is a simple and straightforward technical correction to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  An acknowledged drafting error significantly lengthened the depreciation period for building improvements.  This has caused a large increase in the after-tax costs of modernizing and altering buildings of all types and uses, from shopping centers to office buildings to industrial properties and restaurants.  The result is an immediate and unnecessary drag on building investment, construction activity, and job creation, said Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer.  “Congress should act quickly to pass this legislation and reinstate a much shorter cost recovery period for building improvements.”

  • In October 2018, the Roundtable along with 239 businesses and trade groups, wrote to Secretary Mnuchin urging the Treasury Department to provide taxpayers with administrative relief from the drafting error. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 12, 2018) 

On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told reporters that he has discussed fixing technical errors in the 2017 tax law with congressional leaders on both sides. “This is something we’re very interested in doing. There’s a lot of demand,” he said following his testimony before the Senate Finance Committee. (Bloomberg, Mar. 14)