Category: Tax Policy

House Freedom Caucus Members Propose Ending Deductibility of State and Local Business Taxes

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, House Freedom Caucus Members proposed ending the ability of businesses to deduct their state and local business and property taxes on their federal income tax returns.  (Politico, Jan. 15)

Why It Matters

  • The proposal was raised as a potential offset for relief from the SALT cap on individuals. 
  • The proposal was also included in a “menu” of potential policy options prepared by the House Budget Committee for tax and budget reconciliation legislation.  (PoliticoPro, Jan. 17)
  • The Budget Committee has a key role in setting the overall size of any reconciliation bill, but the actual details of tax changes fall under the jurisdiction of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Industry & Congressional Response

  • “Property taxes and other state-level business taxes are a basic cost of doing business.  Denying the deductibility of these business taxes is nonsensical and would be devastating to American businesses, and especially U.S. real estate.  The purpose of the income tax is to measure and tax income.  Under the proposal, we would no longer have an income tax, we would have a tax on gross revenue.  It would penalize existing property owners, artificially distort business decisions, and raise flashing red lights for anyone even considering a long-term capital investment in the United States,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable.
  • Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) addressed the proposal on the Senate floor earlier today.  (Senate Democrats, Jan. 17)
  • “There is no scenario under God’s green Earth that New York taxpayers will ever accept another unfair SALT cap like the House Freedom Caucus proposes….I will do everything I can, first to remove the entire SALT cap tax, and second to never let a new proposal that for the first time imposes the SALT cap on businesses, small and large, to be put into effect. I’m going to do everything I can to fight this dastardly proposal,” said the Senator.
  • The House Freedom Caucus is one of many factions in the House Republican Conference that will have significant leverage over any tax changes in 2025 due to Republicans’ extraordinary slim majority in the House.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) and House SALT Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) are scheduled to address Roundtable members at the State of the Industry Meeting next week.

Tax Policy 2025: Competing Strategies and CRE Priorities

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) is focused on advancing a tax code that encourages investment, supports economic growth, and ensures fair treatment for commercial real estate. With significant provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) set to expire, tax policy is already dominating early Congressional discussions.

Congressional Dynamics

  • The tax debate is set to kick off on Tuesday, Jan. 14, with the House Committee on Ways and Means’ first hearing on extending key provisions of the TCJA led by Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO).
  • Congress faces the dual challenge of addressing expiring tax provisions while managing fiscal pressures. While bipartisan cooperation is possible on certain issues like affordable housing, divisions over business tax rates, SALT deductions, and the debt ceiling could stall progress.
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson and top House leaders doubled down on their plan to bundle border, tax, and energy policies into a single bill. Meanwhile, Senate leaders are continuing with their two-bill approach, aiming for faster legislative wins for the new administration. (The Hill, Jan. 10)
  • The two chambers are effectively competing to see which strategy can deliver results more quickly.
  • Trump indicated he can live with either approach. “I like one, big, beautiful bill,” Trump said at a press conference on Tuesday. On Wednesday after meeting with Senate Republicans, he told reporters “Whether it’s one bill or two bills, it’s going to get done one way or the other. The end result is the same.” (Axios, Jan. 8 | The Hill, Jan. 8)
  • Speaker Johnson and Republicans are determined to pass their budget blueprint by the end of February. Johnson told reporters Thursday that he’s still working with the Senate to properly “sequence” the massive effort. (PoliticoPro, Jan. 9)
  • On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune refused to commit to the House’s preferred approach and called it an ongoing conversation. “Obviously we want to give the House as much space as possible,” he told reporters. “They believe they can move and execute on getting a bill across the finish line fairly quickly. But we are prepared to move here, as well.” (PoliticoPro, Jan. 9)
  • “We’re going to be having conversations with each chairman to make sure that the targets they’re given are achievable within their committee, and then ultimately get pulled back into budget reconciliation to give us the ability to do all the things you want to do,” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told Punchbowl News. (Punchbowl News, Jan. 10)

Senate Bipartisan Outreach

  • Eleven moderate Senate Democrats, led by Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and Mark Warner (D-VA) wrote to Republican leaders, offering to work with them on extending expiring tax cuts and raising the debt ceiling, proposing bipartisan reforms to balance tax policy and fiscal responsibility. (PoliticoPro, Jan. 10)
  • The letter stated the group was willing to cut spending, protect family-oriented tax policies, maintain competitive business tax rates, — and indicated that they could provide enough votes to allow Republicans to overcome a filibuster in the Senate without having to go through the reconciliation process.
  • While the GOP is unlikely to accept the offer amid internal divisions, the proposal highlights potential avenues for compromise on tax reform and debates ahead.

Roundtable Tax Priorities for 2025

RER encourages lawmakers to ensure that any major tax legislation in 2025 retain or include:

  • The reduced tax rate on capital gains. 
  • Tax fairness for partnerships and pass-through entities.
  • Safeguard like-kind exchanges.
  • Extend, improve, and enact smart tax policies to address the severe housing shortage.
  • Tax rules that encourage, rather than deter, foreign investment in U.S. real estate.

As negotiations and debates continue, RER remains committed to working with lawmakers to ensure the U.S. maintains a competitive tax code that encourages capital formation, rewards entrepreneurial risk-taking, and supports policy objectives, including accessible and affordable housing and safe and healthy communities.

CRE Industry Advocates for Tax Relief to Support Recovery and Stability

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

As the U.S. commercial real estate sector enters a critical recovery period, industry leaders are urging policymakers to retain key tax policies from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), many of which expire at the end of 2025. (Reuters, Oct. 28)

Tax Landscape

  • The outcome of the November presidential election will play a critical role in shaping year-end tax bill discussions.
  • If either candidate secures the presidency and achieves unified control of Congress, they may urge their congressional allies to delay any tax negotiations until 2025.
  • The Roundtable is preparing for potential tax legislation in the lame-duck session, though action may be delayed until next year’s debate when major provisions in the TCJA expire. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 25)
  • In early October, RER submitted comments to Capitol Hill on the pending expiration of the TCJA and ways in which tax policy can support long-term investment, economic stability, and the creation of affordable housing. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 4)

Industry Advocacy

  • Speaking to Reuters, Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer noted the difficult economic backdrop for real estate as the tax debate has gathered steam, “Over the last 18 months … operating costs have … risen dramatically at the same time the availability of capital and credit have diminished…. All of that creates stress and challenges in the CRE marketplace.” (Reuters, Oct. 28)
  • With the tax reform debate heating up in Washington, maintaining sound tax rules that both reflect the economics of real estate transactions and encourage capital formation is a priority for the CRE industry.
  • “Depreciation deductions and interest expense deductions. They’re not tax breaks. They’re the cost of doing business,” said Ryan McCormick (SVP & Counsel, RER) while discussing housing policy in Politico’s Morning Tax.  (Politico, Oct. 28)
  • RER Member Hessam Nadji (President & CEO, Marcus & Millichap) appeared on CNBC International Squawk Box this week and spoke on the upcoming elections, international investor re-engagement with U.S. CRE, zoning and private-public partnerships, and the impact of government policies, particularly regarding housing.

RER Tax Priorities

Roundtable tax priorities heading into 2025 include:

  • Capital formation and capital gains: Preserving key elements of the tax code (e.g., capital gains preference, like-kind exchanges, step-up in basis at death) that encourage productive real estate investment, risk-taking, and growth.
  • Strong partnership, pass–through, and entity choice rules: Extending tax provisions like section 199A that allow pass-through businesses to compete on a level playing field with public corporations.  
  • Affordable housing and community development incentives: Advocating for tax incentives tied to affordable housing, energy efficiency, Opportunity Zones, and commercial-to-residential conversions.
  • Removing barriers to job-creating foreign investment:  The tax system should avoid discriminatory policies that discourage job-creating foreign investment in US real estate and infrastructure.  

Tax Bill Negotiators to Watch

  • Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID): If Republicans take control of the Senate, Crapo is poised to lead the Senate Finance Committee in 2025. Given his influence over Senate Republicans, many of whom followed his opposition to this year’s bipartisan tax bill, Crapo’s stance on a year-end tax deal will be pivotal.
  • Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR): Wyden has shown a willingness to strike deals, as evidenced by his work with Rep. Smith on this year’s agreement. He might be eager to pass as much of that legislation as possible during the lame-duck session.
  • Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO): As chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, Smith’s perspective will be highly influential in the lame-duck session, with Republicans still holding the House majority.

The Roundtable is committed to working with lawmakers to ensure the U.S. maintains a competitive tax code that encourages capital formation, rewards entrepreneurial risk-taking, and supports critical policy objectives, including accessible and affordable housing and safe and healthy communities.

The Roundtable Shares 2025 Tax Legislative Agenda with Lawmakers

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

Responding to a request for input from the chairs of the House Ways and Means Committee and Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee, The Real Estate Roundtable submitted comments on the pending expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and ways in which tax policy can support long-term investment, economic stability, and the creation of affordable housing. (Letter, Oct. 2)

Roundtable Recommendations

The letter from Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer urges lawmakers to ensure that any major tax legislation in 2025 retain or include:

  • The reduced tax rate on long-term capital gains. The capital gains rate is critical for driving long-term real estate investment and fostering job creation. Raising capital gains rates, taxing unrealized gains, or double-taxing gains at death would deter entrepreneurship, increase costs, and reduce economic mobility.
  • Tax fairness for partnerships and pass-through entities. Half of the nation’s tax partnerships are real estate-related, making these provisions vital to the industry’s success.  Section 199A, which provides a 20% deduction on pass-through business income (including REIT dividend income), allows privately held businesses to compete on a level playing field with large corporations.
  • Like-kind exchanges. Section 1031 allows for the deferral of capital gains through real estate exchanges and helps gets languishing properties into the hands of new owners who will invest in, and improve, them.  Retaining section 1031 is vital to promoting reinvestment in communities, creating opportunities for minority and small business owners, and improving struggling properties.
  • Tax rules that encourage, rather than deter, foreign investment in U.S. real estate. Targeted changes to the outdated and discriminatory Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) could unlock capital for large-scale real estate and infrastructure projects that create jobs and spur economic development.
  • Incentives for affordable housing, energy efficiency, and community revitalization. The Roundtable supports expanding the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC), improving the real estate-related clean energy tax provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act, and introducing new incentives for the conversion of obsolete commercial buildings into affordable housing. The letter also calls for a long-term extension of Opportunity Zone (OZ) tax incentives and preserving carried interest tax rules that recognize and reward sweat equity with capital gains treatment.

The Roundtable is committed to working with lawmakers to ensure the U.S. maintains a competitive tax code that encourages capital formation, rewards entrepreneurial risk-taking, and supports critical policy objectives, including accessible and affordable housing and safe and healthy communities.

Senate Finance Committee Tackles 2025 Tax Policy Debate

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on the 2025 tax policy debate, highlighting sharp divides between Republicans and Democrats over the future of the key provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) that are set to expire in 2025. (Watch Hearing | Bloomberg, Sept. 12)

2025 Tax Policy Debate

  • Chair Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) pushed for reforms targeting tax avoidance by the ultra-wealthy. Wyden pointed out tactics like “buy, borrow, die,” which he argues allow billionaires to accumulate wealth without paying appropriate taxes, and criticized corporate tax loopholes​. (Sen. Wyden Statement)
  • Ranking Member Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) defended the TCJA, emphasizing its positive impact on economic growth, job creation, and tax relief for middle-class Americans. Sen. Crapo warned that allowing the TCJA to expire would result in significant tax increases for individuals and businesses, harming the economy. (Sen. Crapo Statement)
  • Jeff Brabant, VP of Federal Government Relations at the National Federation of Independent Business, testified on the importance of making the 20% pass-through business income deduction (Section 199A) permanent and shared new data detailing the critical impact the deduction’s looming expiration will have on the small business economy if Congress fails to act. (Brabant Testimony)
  • Republicans also pushed back on potential changes to estate taxes, including lowering exemptions or eliminating stepped-up basis, which they argue would hurt family-owned businesses. (Bloomberg, Sept. 12)
  • Speaking on the consequences of eliminating stepped-up basis on small businesses, Brabant said, “If you get rid of stepped-up basis and you have an increase in the death tax, you’re looking at a double death tax. Our members who are nearing retirement, this is a critical issue for them. The concern for the small business sector is, often these small businesses are selling these businesses—because they can’t afford to pay these taxes—to larger businesses that don’t have the same footprint in these same small rural communities.”

199A Coalition

  • The Roundtable is a founding member of the newly formed PROTECT Coalition, an alliance of small, medium and large pass-through businesses and industries that oppose the expiration of Section 199A. (Politico, Sept. 5)
  • The coalition’s mission is to defend vital tax incentives that support the growth and sustainability of successful entrepreneurial businesses across the nation.
  • The Real Estate Roundtable’s SVP & Counsel Ryan McCormick said, “Over four million businesses, including two million in real estate, are organized as partnerships. Section 199A was enacted to ensure that these entrepreneurial businesses could compete on a level playing field with large corporations. Permanently extending Section 199A will allow partnerships and other pass-through businesses to continue advancing careers, investing in communities, and expanding economic opportunity for all.”

What’s Next

  • The TCJA expiration looms large, with both parties framing the debate around small businesses, working families, and economic growth. Republicans argue that letting it expire would stifle economic activity, while Democrats are focused on shifting more of the tax burden on higher-income earners.
  • Next week, on September 18 at 2:00 PM EDT, the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Policy, chaired by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) will hold a hearing on the macroeconomic impacts of potential tax reform in 2025.

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) will continue to closely track ongoing tax debates in Congress.

The Roundtable Files Amicus Brief in Sirius Solutions v. Commissioner

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

On August 19, The Roundtable submitted an amicus brief to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sirius Solutions v. Commissioner, a pivotal case that could redefine the tax obligations of limited partners under the self-employment tax in the Self-Employed Contributions Act (SECA). (Amicus Brief)

Why It Matters

  • There are more than 441,000 limited partnerships in the U.S., with over 10 million partners. Nearly half of these limited partnerships are real estate partnerships.
  • If the IRS position prevails, it could result in widespread tax increases on real estate limited partners who provide some services to the business and effectively raise the tax burden on real estate investments.
  • The IRS’s position would requires limited partners to be “passive investors” to qualify for the exemption from the 3.8% SECA tax under Section 1402(a)(13).

Roundtable Amicus Brief

  • The Roundtable’s amicus brief argues that the IRS’s interpretation is flawed, pointing to decades of state law that allows limited partners to provide services and still retain their status.
  • The brief emphasizes that pre-1977 state court decisions and the IRS’s own 1994 proposed regulations contradict the government’s position that limited partners must be passive to avoid SECA taxes.
  • The Tax Court’s imposition of the passive investor test is found nowhere in the statute and rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of state laws that Roundtable members and others have relied on for decades.  
  • Ignoring an established body of partnership law, the IRS is relying on a recent Tax Court decision, Soroban, that imposes a judge-made test requiring a limited partner to be a “passive investor.” The Roundtable believes this fundamental error should be reversed. 

What’s Next

  • The Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Sirius will set a precedent for future SECA tax cases, with significant consequences for real estate and other industries that use limited partnerships for business purposes.
  • A successful outcome in the Sirius case could reduce the likelihood that the government moves forward with formal tax guidance that expands the reach of SECA taxes.    

The Roundtable remains committed to protecting entrepreneurs’ ability to flexibly organize in partnerships and other pass-through entities that promote capital formation, risk-taking, and economic growth, and it will remain engaged as the SECA dispute moves forward.   

Bipartisan Tax Bill Stalls in Senate

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

Yesterday, the Senate failed to pass a bipartisan $79 billion tax package, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 (H.R. 7024). The House-passed legislation seeks to extend various expiring tax provisions from the 2017 and pandemic-related tax bills. (WSJ, Aug. 1 | The Hill, Aug. 1)

Key Points

  • Bipartisan Effort: Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) and House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith (R-MO) crafted the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 (H.R. 7024). The bill passed the House on Jan. 31 by an overwhelming 357-70 vote.
  • Senate Opposition: Despite bipartisan support, the bill faced significant opposition in the Senate, where critics argued it failed to adequately address long-term fiscal concerns and prioritized short-term fixes.
  • Roundtable Support: The bill included Roundtable-supported measures on business interest deductibility, bonus depreciation, and the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC).
  • Other provisions in the agreement: Reforms to the child tax credit, the expensing of R&D costs, disaster tax relief, a double-taxation tax agreement with Taiwan, and a large pay-for that creates significant new penalties for abuse of the employee retention tax credit (ERTC) rules and accelerates the expiration of the ERTC. (RW, Jan. 19)

Roundtable Advocacy

  • In February, The Roundtable and a large coalition of housing and other real estate groups sent letters to Congress in support of the tax bill. (RW, Feb. 16)
  • The Roundtable and the Housing Affordability Coalition’s letter emphasized the importance of advancing provisions in the bill that strengthen the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC)—along with various real estate investment measures that would benefit families, workers, and the national economy.
  • The coalition noted how the bill would increase the housing supply as a positive response to the nation’s housing affordability crisis. It would also suspend certain tax increases on business investment that took effect in 2022 and 2023. 

Congress will return to Washington on September 9, with several critical legislative priorities on the agenda, including decisions on key housing policies and potential new regulations impacting the commercial real estate industry.

Roundtable Requests Additional Guidance for FIRPTA REIT Regulations

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

Today, The Roundtable wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen requesting that the Treasury Department provide additional clarifying guidance regarding transition relief in the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act’s (FIRPTA) regulations for domestically controlled REITs.  (Letter)

Key Concerns

  • In April, Treasury issued final regulations that redefined what constitutes a domestically controlled REIT exempt from tax under FIRPTA. The regulations created a new look-through rule that extended the reach of the discriminatory FIRPTA regime to common investment structures. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26)
  • Clarifying guidance is necessary and urgent to enable a qualified investment entity (QIE) to make a timely determination concerning its direct or indirect ownership of “U.S. real property interests” (“USRPI(s)”) under the conditions of the Transition Rule.
  • Impact on foreign investment: Foreign investment can attract significant capital, helping to support market stability and create jobs. The final regulations, designed to define a domestically controlled QIE, are feared to be deterring foreign investment in U.S. real estate.
  • Outstanding questions: Specifically, the letter seeks additional guidance on: what constitutes “direct or indirect” ownership of real estate when it is held by a REIT through multiple subsidiaries, how to treat acquisition costs and capitalization expenditures, and situations where ongoing construction or substantial renovations are occurring. 

Roundtable Advocacy

FIRPTA
  • The Roundtable has consistently advocated for the withdrawal of regulations and policies that hinder foreign investment in U.S. real estate. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26)
  • David Friedline, a tax partner at Deloitte and Vice Chair of RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) said, “The official guidance would provide needed clarification for our members, who have been adversely affected by the final regulations’ new look-through rule, on how to comply with the conditions of the transition relief.”  Friedline was a principal drafter of the Roundtable letter. 
  • Building new affordable housing and office-to-residential conversion projects requires encouraging more investment, not less. Erecting new barriers to passive foreign investment in U.S. real estate runs counter to important bipartisan policy priorities.

The Roundtable remains committed to collaborating with the Treasury to ensure that the final regulations can provide much-needed clarity and stability, supporting the industry’s efforts to attract foreign capital and drive economic growth.

Supreme Court Rules in Case of Federal Taxation of Unrealized Income

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to uphold the constitutionality of mandatory repatriation tax (MRT) enacted in 2017, but chose to sidestep and not rule on the issue of whether the Constitution imposes a realization requirement on the taxation of income. (Moore v. United States)

Background & The Decision

  • The petitioners in Moore argued that the MRT exceeds Congress’s authority under the 16th Amendment to lay and collect taxes on income. The Moore’s were shareholders of a foreign corporation. The corporation never distributed its earnings, but the MRT taxed the Moore’s on their deemed share of the corporation’s income. The Moore’s argued that the federal government could not tax them on income they never realized. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 13)
  • A decision in favor of the Moore’s could have important consequences for both legislative proposals to tax unrealized gains, but also existing aspects of the tax code and pass-through taxation. 
  • The Ninth Circuit ruled against the Moore’s on the grounds that there is no realization requirement in the Constitution. 
  • The Roundtable has consistently opposed proposals to tax unrealized gains on several grounds, including their constitutionality and the damage they would cause to the economy, entrepreneurship, and productive investment. 
  • The Supreme Court, in a decision authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, stepped back from the sweeping holding by Ninth Circuit and concluded that it did not need to rule on the realization question because the foreign company’s operating income was clearly “realized” by the foreign company. In passing the MRT, Congress was simply attributing (or passing through) that income to its U.S. shareholders. 
  • The 7-2 opinion by Justice Kavanagh was accompanied by two concurring opinions, one from Justice Jackson and one from Justice Barrett (joined by Justice Alito). Justices Thomas and Gorsuch dissented. 
  • While the Real Estate Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) and its members are still parsing the language of the various opinions to understand the broader implications, at the end of the day, there appear to be at least four justices willing to uphold a realization requirement (Barrett, Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch), one justice prepared to hold that realization is not required (Jackson), and four justices who have not yet tipped their hand (Kavanaugh, Roberts, Sotomayor, and Kagan).  See analysis of Moore decision by TPAC member Don Susswein (Principal, RSM US LLP)

The Moore ruling is unlikely the last word in the heated debate over the constitutionality of taxing unrealized gains.

IRS and Treasury Unveil New Rules Aimed at Partnership “Basis-Shifting” Transactions

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, the IRS and Treasury Department announced a multistage regulatory initiative aimed at regulating certain partnership transactions that shift the tax basis of assets and generate additional depreciation deductions, reduce taxable gains, or increase deductible losses. (IRS-Treasury Press Release, June 17)

Guidance Package

IRS building in Washington DC
  • In Notice 2024-54, Treasury and the IRS indicated they intend to issue proposed regulations governing certain transactions that affect the basis of property held by a partnership or distributed by a partnership. The guidance will focus on partnerships that involve related parties or tax-indifferent parties. 
  • Related parties could include family members, corporations and their shareholders, and other entities and businesses with common or overlapping ownership.  It is unclear from the guidance where the administration believes the targeted abuses generating inappropriate tax benefits are most likely to arise (e.g., corporate mergers, family offices, real estate, etc.). 
  • The rules will apply to cost recovery deductions and gain/loss calculations for tax years ending after June 17, 2024, thus covering deductions, gains, or losses attributable to transactions completed in prior years. 

Roundtable Concerns

  • A principal concern voiced at this week’s RER Tax Policy Advisory Committee meeting is related to the broad scope of the new rules. Rather than focusing specifically on identifiable, abusive transactions, Notice 2024-54 states that the forthcoming regulations will provide “mechanical rules applicable to all covered transactions without regard to the taxpayer’s intent and without regard to whether the transactions could be abusive or lacking in economic substance.”
  • Moreover, the Notice states that the regulations will only apply if the transaction results in a basis increase for the relevant property.  “If, and to the extent, property has been allocated a basis decrease, the proposed rules would not apply.”
  • The new rules thus apply to a transaction regardless of whether the transaction is abusive or lacking in economic substance, but only if they result in a negative outcome for the taxpayer.  If the same mechanical rules would generate a positive result for another taxpayer, they are disregarded.  In sum: Heads, IRS wins; tails, taxpayer loses. 

Additional Developments:

Other elements of the regulatory initiative include:

  • Proposed regulations (REG-124593-23) identifying some partnership-related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest and requiring disclosures by participants and material advisers. 
  • Revenue Ruling 2024-14 notifying taxpayers that it will apply the codified economic substance doctrine to challenge certain basis-shifting transactions. 
  • The IRS Office of Chief Counsel also announced the formation of a new associate office focused exclusively on partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates. (TaxNotes, June 17)

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee will continue its discussion of the partnership basis-shifting issue and how best to respond on its next TPAC Zoom meeting.