Author: Trey Jackson

A business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable on March 5 wrote to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to urge a delay in the implementation of the proposed Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) accounting standard, which may begin to reduce aggregate bank lending as early as next year. (Coalition Letter, March 5)

The March 5 coalition letter cites a 2018 KPMB survey showing companies are struggling to make certain accounting, modeling and data decisions to be in compliance with CECL. (KPMG, Financial institutions feeling the crunch in countdown to CECL implementation)

• The new CECL model will change the way banks calculate reserves on assets, requiring certain financial institutions to estimate the expected loss over the life of a loan beginning in January 2020.  For real estate, there is concern is that banks may reduce lending volumes as they build up additional capital reserves to be in compliance with CECL. 

• The accounting rule change was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in June 2016 as a result of the 2008 financial crisis.

• The regulatory change in how banks estimate losses in their allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) will require substantial changes in data analytics and financial methodologies.  The March 5 coalition letter cites a 2018 KPMB survey showing companies are struggling to make certain accounting, modeling and data decisions to be in compliance with CECL.  (KPMG, Financial institutions feeling the crunch in countdown to CECL implementation)

• According to Trepp’s Looking at Historical CRE Losses for CECL, “To benchmark and fine-tune loss methodologies for CECL, the key for banks will be a four-letter word: data.  Unfortunately, many banks have very little in the way of granular historical data, and a number of those that do have good data have taken few to no losses in their history. This has made it difficult for those banks to effectively model future losses.”  (Trepp article by Joe McBride, April 21, 2017)

• To avoid unintended economic consequences, the coalition states in its letter, “We believe it is important to delay implementation of CECL in order to allow for time to conduct a quantitative impact analysis and to consider potential alternatives, while allowing for post-issuance field testing. Time for further assessment will also allow regulators to better understand and address the key consequences of any proposal for capital and other regulatory purposes.”

The 8 signatories to the coalition letter are the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, The Real Estate Roundtable, Commercial Real Estate Finance Council, Mortgage Bankers Association, National Association of Realtors, Credit Union National Association and National Association of Federal Credit Unions.

Following the Nov. 6 mid-term elections, a “Lame Duck” session of Congress is expected to consider various tax policies of importance to commercial real estate.   

Several tax issues of importance to real estate may be in play during the November “Lame Duck” congressional session, including  condo tax accounting rules; technical corrections; the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP);and tax extenders.

• As part of a potential year-end omnibus spending bill to fund the government, tax policies that may be addressed include condo tax accounting rules; technical corrections; the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP); and tax extenders.  (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 12) 
• Current condo tax accounting rules require multifamily developers of buildings with five or more residential units to recognize income and pay tax on their expected profit as construction is ongoing — well before pre-sale transactions are closed and full payment is due from the buyer.  This mismatch of cash flow and tax liability prevents income tax deferment until a condo building is finished.   Home builders of single-family homes, townhouses and row houses are not subject to this accounting rule restriction. 
• A House bill introduced last summer by Reps. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) and Joe Crowley (D-NY) aimed to correct this disparity.  Although the Fair Accounting for Condominium Construction Act (H.R. 3659) stalled in 2017, it could serve as a template for inclusion in year-end tax legislation.  The Real Estate Roundtable supports lawmakers’ efforts to pass H.R. 3659. 
• Other congressional efforts to ensure that development accounting rules treat condos like other residential construction included a 2016 letter from 10 members of the Senate Finance Committee urging regulatory corrections to former Treasury Secretary Jack Lew. 
• Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer on April 7, 2017 sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin   outlining eight regulatory actions the Treasury Department could take to stimulate new real estate investment, job creation, and economic growth.  Among the recommendations addressed in the letter are tax accounting for new condominium construction; the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, tax treatment of private real estate funds and partnership tax rules. 

Last week, an article on the condo tax accounting issue in The Real Deal included a quote from Roundtable Senior Vice President & Counsel Ryan McCormick, who commented on the outlook for correcting the current rules.  “Legislation may be the most likely route, in light of all the work ongoing at Treasury with tax reform,” McCormick said.

This week The Real Estate Roundtable, along with 239 businesses and trade groups, wrote to Secretary Mnuchinurging the Treasury Department to provide taxpayers with administrative relief from a drafting mistake in last year’s tax overhaul that increased the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).

This week, The Real Estate Roundtable, along with 239 businesses and trade groups,  wrote to Secretary Mnuchin  urging the Treasury Department to provide taxpayers with administrative relief from a drafting mistake in last year’s tax overhaul that increased the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).

• The drafting error in the tax law has resulted in a significantly longer 39-year cost recovery period for new, qualified nonresidential interior improvements.  The intent of Congress was to allow the immediate expensing of QIP – or provide a 20-year recovery period in the case of taxpayers electing out of new limitations on the deductibility of business interest. 

• In the Oct. 9 letter to Secretary Mnuchin, the coalition addressed the need for a QIP correction, along with the unintended consequences if action is not taken.  The letter raised concerns that the drafting error is resulting in “[d]elays in store and restaurant remodeling projects,” “[b]usinesses refraining from purchasing or leasing vacant stores or other leasehold spaces that require improvements,” and “[l]oss of construction jobs associated with commercial renovation projects.”  

• The coalition letter was sent in response to the Administration’s request for comments on newly proposed regulationsimplementing the additional first year depreciation deduction (immediate expensing) benefit.  The coalition submission also included two recent letters—one from 16 Democratic Senators to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and the other from 58 House Republicans to GOP leadership—reiterating the importance for policymakers to correct this unintentional drafting mistake in last year’s legislation, while recommending that Treasury should issue interim guidance and refrain from enforcing the drafting error.  (House Letter, Oct 2 and Senate Letter, Sept 24)

• The Real Estate Roundtable and a broad-based business coalition urged Secretary Mnuchin in August to issue guidance clarifying certain provisions included in tax overhaul legislation enacted last year – including the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property. (Coalition letter, Aug. 22)

Congress could address the issue during the lame duck congressional session between the mid-term election and January. Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Thune (R-SD) said GOP lawmakers are motivated to address a number of tax issues that are outstanding, including tax reform technical corrections and expired tax provisions. (The Hill, Oct. 11)

A broad-based business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable urged Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Wednesday to issue guidance clarifying certain provisions included in tax overhaul legislation enacted last year — including the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).  ( Coalition letter , Aug. 22)

A broad-based business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable urged Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Wednesday to issue guidance clarifying certain provisions included in tax overhaul legislation enacted last year — including the cost recovery period for qualified improvement property (QIP).  (Coalition letter , Aug. 22)

• An unintentional drafting mistake in the tax law has resulted in a significantly longer 39-year cost recovery period for new, qualified nonresidential interior improvements.  Congress intended to allow the immediate expensing of qualified improvements, or provide a 20-year recovery period in the case of taxpayers electing out of new limitations on the deductibility of business interest.  
• The drafting error affects leasehold improvements, expenditures made to improve common spaces in shopping centers and office buildings, and other interior improvements to nonresidential structures.  The longer cost recovery period effectively increases the after-tax cost of upgrading and improving commercial real estate.   (“Correcting the Drafting Error Involving the Expensing of Qualified Improvement Property ” –  The Tax Foundation , May 30)     
• The August 22 letter includes 283 signatories, who state the delay in correcting the  QIP provision is delaying some store and restaurant remodeling projects, and causing some retailers to decline opportunities to purchase or lease new store locations that would require substantial improvements.  
• The coalition letter further explains, “These decisions not only deny communities the jobs associated with substantial construction projects, but also deny our communities the opportunity to bring new, permanent jobs to an otherwise abandoned store or to revitalize a declining mall. The delayed investment in remodeling projects is also causing a decline in sales by manufacturers that supply products used in remodels, like energy-efficient lighting and plumbing supplies.”  
• The coalition urges Secretary Mnuchin “to issue guidance that will facilitate the intent of the law and eliminate the imposition of large additional tax compliance and accounting burdens on taxpayers, as well as associated tax enforcement burdens on the Internal Revenue Service.”  
• Last week, all Republican members of the Finance Committee and Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) wrote to Treasury and the IRS, requesting “guidance that is consistent with the congressional intent” of the new tax law regarding QIP expensing and two other tax policy areas.  (Roundtable Weekly, Aug. 17)    

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer stated, “In 2015, Congress voted overwhelmingly to permanently extend the 15-year recovery period for certain property improvements.  By passing tax reform, Congress intended to consolidate those changes.  Treasury should now use its authority to provide taxpayers with relief until a technical corrections bill is enacted.  Treasury guidance will remove taxpayer uncertainty, unlock investment, and spur job-creating property upgrades and renovations.” 

The Real Estate Roundtable, Associated General Contractors, and 16 U.S. organizations representing the contracting, insurance and real estate sectors today urged the House Judiciary Committee and key congressional offices to swiftly pass the Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2017 (H.R. 3808), sponsored by Rep. John Faso (R-NY).  (Coalition Letter, Jan. 19)

According to the  coalition letter  , the Infrastructure Expansion Act seeks to provide is a 21st century solution to ameliorate the harsh impact of an outdated 19th century law, which is restraining modern interstate commerce and economically burdening transportation projects that cross state lines.

H.R. 3808 is a common sense tort reform effort aimed at correcting inequities from New York State’s outdated “Scaffold Law.”  Passed during the Industrial Revolution – long before the advent of Federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration and workers’ compensation laws – the Law holds property owners, employers, and contractors fully liable for all fall-related injuries at building and infrastructure construction sites. 

As a result, courts have interpreted the New York law to subject property owners and contractors to “absolute liability.”  Under this standard, the costs of injuries from commonplace painting, cleaning, remodeling, and construction activities are completely borne by property owners and contractors, even if they do not directly employ the injured worker.  The Scaffold Law also deems property owners and contractors as absolutely liable for height-related incidents, without regard to whether the worker caused the accident and intensified his or her own injuries.  Under this standard, even an inebriated worker who stumbles and falls at a project site is not held accountable to the extent his intoxicated state caused his own injuries.  (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 27, 2017) 

The House bill counters the absolute liability standard by specifying that lawsuits against property owners and contractors for injuries associated with slips, falls, and “gravity-related risks” at Federally-assisted projects should instead be held to a “comparative negligence” standard.  When workers proximately cause their own injuries, comparative negligence factors such self-inflicted harm to proportionately limit damages awarded by judges and juries.  H.R. 3808 fosters the comparative negligence legal standard adopted by the overwhelming majority of courts, legislatures, and legal scholars across the United States. 

According to the coalition letter, the Infrastructure Expansion Act seeks to provide is a 21st century solution to ameliorate the harsh impact of an outdated 19th century law, which is restraining modern interstate commerce and economically burdening transportation projects that cross state lines.  

Rep. John Faso (R-NY) introduced the  Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2017 (H.R. 3808)  , intended to counter New York State’s “Scaffold Law.”

Among specific examples offered in the letter showing the economic impacts of the Scaffolding Law is  the Gateway Program, a Department of Transportation-assisted rail tunnel project of overwhelming national significance.  The New York law is estimated to drive-up costs by as much as 300 million dollars for this project, which will modernize the power grid, update a century-old tunnel inundated by Superstorm Sandy, and help eliminate a train “bottleneck” in the Northeast Corridor that contributes $50 billion to US GDP annually.  H.R. 3808 can help reduce the substantial added costs from insurance coverage, excessive litigation pay-outs, and project delays for interstate infrastructure construction like Gateway. 

“On the heels of a major federal infrastructure initiative, Rep. Faso’s bill is welcome news – enacting it would drive down costs of proposed infrastructure projects like the vital Gateway tunnel project between New York and New Jersey, said John Banks, President of the Real Estate Board of New York.  (See REBNY Newsroom, Oct. 25, 2017).  

Additionally, the Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2017 does not diminish or alter Federal or state OSHA obligations, nor does it foreclose “no-fault” workers’ compensation. 

The coalition letter addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Ranking Member Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) concludes that H.R. 3808 “… simply makes property owners, contractors, and workers accountable for their own choices and conduct at construction sites benefitting from Federal taxpayer dollars. We encourage swift passage of the ‘Infrastructure Expansion Act.'”

President Trump signed major bipartisan legislation today that allocates more than $2.7 trillion in discretionary federal spending over two years; suspends the debt ceiling until July 2021; and permanently eliminates the prospect of strict “sequestration”
spending caps imposed under the Budget Control Act of 2011. ( The Hill , Aug. 2) 

After passing the budget deal yesterday, the Senate left for summer recess, following the House’s exit last week.  Congress will reconvene on September 9.

• The legislation – a result of weeks of negotiations between Democratic congressional leaders and the White House – passed the Senate yesterday by a vote of 67-28 after the House last week approved it 284-149.  (Roundtable Weekly, July 26).  President Trump tweeted yesterday
  in support of the bill. 

• Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) yesterday commented on the bill: “In recent weeks, key officials on President Trump’s team engaged in extensive negotiations with Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic House.  Given the exigencies of
  divided government, we knew that any bipartisan agreement on funding levels would not appear perfect to either side. But the administration negotiated a strong deal.” (CNN,
  August 1) 

• Notably, the budget deal puts an end to the threat of sequestration, which would have imposed a mandatory 10 percent cut on all programs if budget targets were not met.  Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), said yesterday, “For too long,
  the arbitrary, draconian limits of sequester have hampered our ability to invest in working Americans and in our military readiness. This deal ends the threat of sequester permanently. That is huge.” (Schumer Floor Remarks, August
  1) 

• President Trump has indicated he wanted to eliminate budget brinkmanship in Washington that last year resulted in the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history – while obtaining a two-year budget allocation until after the 2020
  presidential election.  (Wall Street Journal, August 1) 

• After passing the budget deal yesterday, the Senate left for summer recess, following the House’s exit last week.  Congress will reconvene on September 9. 

• Policymakers will face a tight deadline upon their return as they will need to set federal appropriations for individual agencies and departments for FY’20.  Current FY’19 funding runs out on September 30, as does legislative authority for the
  National Flood Insurance and EB-5 investment programs.  

If Congress and President Trump cannot agree on how to allocate the $1.37 trillion in discretionary money allotted for the new fiscal year beginning October 1, a stopgap funding measure (or “Continuing Resolution”) may be required.

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on July 24 overwhelmingly passed  S. 2203 , the Brand USA Extension Act  to reauthorize the organization that promotes the U.S. globally as a travel destination. 

Brand USA is a public-private partnership  that attracts international travelers to the U.S. to encourage tourism spending at America’s hospitality, retail, attraction and other properties.  The Brand USA marketing organization operates at no expense to taxpayers.  Private sector contributions fund the program, matched by U.S. government fees collected from foreign visitors who enjoy visa-free entry to the U.S.

• Brand USA is a public-private partnership  that attracts international travelers to the U.S. to encourage tourism spending at America’s hospitality, retail, attraction and other properties.  The Brand USA marketing organization operates at no expense to taxpayers.  Private sector contributions fund the program, matched by U.S. government fees collected from foreign visitors who enjoy visa-free entry to the U.S. 
• The federal portion of Brand USA funding runs out next year.  S. 2203 would extend the federal cost-share until 2027, and increase the foreign traveler fees that pay for the federal portion. 

• The bill’s bipartisan co-sponsors are Sens. Roy Blunt (R-MO), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Cory Gardner (R-CO), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Lindsey Grahan (R-SC), and Jacky Rosen (D-NV).  Nearly 50 senators signed-onto a bipartisan May 2019 “Dear Colleague” letter to support reauthorizing and extending Brand USA. 

• The Real Estate Roundtable is part of the Visit U.S. Coalition which advocates for Brand USA reauthorization.  The coalition, led by the U.S. Travel Association (USTA) and the American Hotel and Lodging Association, also includes the American Resort Development Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  The importance of international travel to the domestic economy, job growth, and CRE was the focus of a panel discussion during The Roundtable’s 2018 Annual Meeting. (Roundtable Weekly, June 15, 2018). 

• A study released last year shows that Brand USA’s marketing efforts brought in 6.6 million incremental international visitors to the U.S. between 2013 and 2018, at a return-on-investment of $28 in visitor spending for every $1 the agency spent on marketing. 

• S. 2203 is introduced at a crucial time, as recent travel trend figures forecast steady declines in the U.S.’s share of the international travel market through at least 2022.   The decline in market share represents estimated losses to the domestic economy of 14 million international visitors, $59 billion in international traveler spending and 120,000 U.S. jobs. (USTA news release, Aug. 1) 

• Other travel policy legislation is pending in the House.  Reps. Mike Quigley (D-IL) and Tom Rice (R-SC) on April 9 reintroduced the bipartisan Jobs Originating through Launching Travel (JOLT) Act of 2019 (H.R. 2187) to improve national security, increase international tourism, and reform visa laws.  (Roundtable Weekly, April 26, 2019) 

When Congress returns from its summer recess on Sept. 9, policymakers will face the task of setting FY’20 federal appropriations for individual agencies and departments – before current funding runs out on September 30.  It is uncertain which individual programs such as Brand USA could be addressed within these funding bills, or whether Congress will need to pass an extension of current funding levels via a “Continuing Resolution.”  (Roundtable Weekly, Aug. 2)

# # #

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW) unanimously approved a bill on Tuesday to authorize $287 billion over five years to repair and maintain the nation’s surface transportation.  The bipartisan measure also aims to expedite the
infrastructure permitting process, help address climate change, and grow the economy.  ( EPW Committee news release ,
July 30)  

The Roundtable on April 29 submitted  infrastructure policy recommendations  to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) and Ranking Member Sam Graves (R-MO  ).

• America’s Transportation Infrastructure Act of 2019 (ATIA, S. 2302) is not the comprehensive infrastructure overhaul that Republicans and Democrats
  have long sought. (Roundtable Weekly,May 3, 2019.)  However, it makes
  progress toward shoring-up the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) – the nation’s largest financing source for roads, bridges, tunnels, and mass transit.  Congress must reauthorize and capitalize the HTF before it runs out of money by the
  end of September 2020, at the height of the presidential election season. (ATIA summary and
  section-by-section analysis)  

• The ATIA would also codify Trump Administration measures to cut lengthy
  project permitting times.  EPW Chairman John Barrasso (R-WY) and Ranking Member Tom Carper (D-DE) stated their bill “will speed up project delivery by codifying key elements of the President’s ‘One Federal Decision’ policy,
  without forgoing important environmental protections. Cutting red tape will allow important highway infrastructure projects to be built quicker and smarter.”  (July 29 CNN joint op-ed)

• President Trump tweeted his support of S. 2302 on
  July 30, praising the EPW Committee’s 21-0 vote as a bipartisan achievement. 

• The bill now moves to the Finance Committee, chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), to figure out how to pay for it through tax revenues and other means.  Additionally, the Senate Banking Committee, chaired by Mike Crapo (R-ID), must also mark-up
  sections dealing with mass transit programs.  The Senate’s No. 2 Republican, John Thune (R-SD), said funding the bill will be a “heavy lift” and that any broader infrastructure package is “really unlikely.”  (POLITICO Morning Transportation, Aug. 2)

• One financing source reportedly off-the-table is an increase to the “pay-at-the-pump” gas user fee that capitalizes the HTF.  Congress has not raised the so-called “gas tax” since 1993, and its buying power has been significantly diminished since
  then by inflation and gains in fuel efficiency.  Grassley said the Finance Committee will not consider how to pay for the ATIA until Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) “says he’s willing to let a gas tax increase on the floor.” 
  (BGov Tax, July 31)

• The Real Estate Roundtable’s infrastructure policy agenda recommends a responsible increase to the gas user fee to sustain the Highway Trust Fund for the long term;
  streamlined permitting goals; and support for infrastructure innovations (such as driverless and electric vehicles) that respond to the nation’s changing demographics and accommodate increased demands for transit-oriented development.

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer discussed the role of public-private partnerships to develop infrastructure projects on  CNBC’s Squawk Box  in June 2017 .  ( Roundtable Weekly , June 9, 2017)  Congressional committees have also received statements from The Roundtable outlining our infrastructure priorities. ( Roundtable Weekly,   
May 3, 2019  and March 22, 2019 ).