Author: Trey Jackson

Senate Budget Deal Advances with Trump Support, Tax Policy in Focus

Posted on by Trey Jackson

This week saw a major announcement from President Trump on sweeping new tariffs and movement in Congress as the Senate advances a compromise budget resolution, with big implications for tax and spending cuts.

Budget Resolution Moves Forward

  • During his tariff announcement, President Trump announced his “complete and total support” for a compromise budget resolution released on Wednesday. The statement came after Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) unveiled the updated resolution, paving the way for a vote later this week. (Punchbowl News, April 3)

  • Trump’s public support for the budget resolution was the result of behind-the-scenes negotiations with Senate leadership to move the reconciliation process forward.
  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and others in the administration brought the meeting together to alleviate the concerns of skeptical deficit hawks who believed the Senate’s budget resolution didn’t do enough to cut spending. (Punchbowl News, April 3)

  • After receiving assurances from Trump about his support for large-scale deficit reductions, Senators John Kennedy (R-LA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) seemed to get on board with the compromise budget resolution. With key holdouts resolved, Majority Leader Thune appears to have the votes needed to get the resolution adopted. (CNN, April 2)

  • The budget resolution includes separate spending cut instructions for the House and Senate. While House committees are instructed to find $1.5 trillion in spending cuts, the Senate instructions only call for $4 billion. Senate GOP leaders indicate that they still plan to target $1.5 to $2 trillion in spending cuts, giving them greater flexibility but punting lingering issues down the road. (Politico, April 3)

  • A “vote-a-rama” on the budget resolution is expected to begin Friday evening, with final adoption anticipated early Saturday. (Politico, April 2)

Tax Policy Implications

  • The compromise budget resolution incorporates a “current policy baseline” approach that allows the 2017 tax cuts to be permanently extended without needing to offset roughly $4 trillion in costs.

  • The Senate version also authorizes $1.5 trillion in additional tax relief beyond making the tax cuts permanent, allowing tax writers to include other key provisions that business advocates are asking for.

  • The current policy baseline was another sticking point in the Senate resolution that has been punted to later in the process. Senate GOP leadership has opted to assert that the Budget Committee Chair has the authority to choose the baseline used in reconciliation. (Axios, April 1)

  • While this decision allows the compromise budget resolution to move forward, the parliamentarian could still rule on the issue later on. If the parliamentarian rules against the current policy baseline, it would dramatically change the budget resolution landscape and potentially force the GOP to enact a shorter-term extension of the 2017 tax cuts, rather than making them permanent.

  • The current policy baseline also has political implications. Responding to the Senate resolution, House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-TX) and other House tax writers expressed concern that the Senate budget resolution could add as much as $5.3 trillion to the debt. (Politico, April 2)

  • House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) was more optimistic about the compromise budget resolution and the inclusion of the current policy baseline, saying, “We’re in the consensus-building business here… So we’ll have to socialize this with our members and see. Look, I think there’s a large number of House Republicans who expected that would be the final outcome… so it’s not a big surprise.” (Punchbowl News, April 3)

  • In a conversation with Punchbowl News this week, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee French Hill (R-AR) emphasized that President Trump and House and Senate GOP leaders are united on the urgency to get the reconciliation package done.

  • Rep. Hill also strongly defended the current tax treatment of carried interest. “It’s not a loophole,” he said, calling it an “important component for long-term finance across the country” for many businesses, including commercial real estate, venture capital and energy. (Punchbowl News, April 3)

Looking Ahead
The coming weeks are a critical time for the administration and congressional leaders on key issues, including trade and tax policy. RER will continue to engage with policymakers to advocate for pro-growth policies that support investment, job creation and healthy real estate markets.

Real Estate Coalition Urges Support for ENERGY STAR Program

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and industry partners voiced strong support for Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ENERGY STAR program in a letter to Administrator Lee Zeldin this week—urging continued support for the voluntary, market-driven platform that underpins building efficiency, grid reliability, and energy cost savings. (Letter)

Why It Matters

  • Commercial real estate relies more on ENERGY STAR than any other voluntary federal public-private partnership. It provides CRE’s standard tool to track and reduce building energy use—supporting lower utility bills, smart cap ex investments, and reduced regulatory red tape. (Letter)
  • “Real estate assets that do more with less energy – as quantified, monetized, and recognized though Portfolio Manager and other ENERGY STAR offerings – are critical to achieve EPA’s pillars to “power the great American comeback,” the letter stated.

Facts and Stats

  • More than 330,000 buildings—representing nearly 25% of U.S. commercial building floor space—utilized EPA’s Portfolio Manager software last year.
  • ENERGY STAR-certified buildings achieve an average of 35% less energy usage compared to similar non-certified buildings.
  • The program has saved businesses and families nearly $200 billion in utility bills since 1992, including $14 billion in 2024 alone.

Driving the Energy Comeback

The real estate industry letter how ENERGY STAR supports EPA goals to:

  • Restore Energy Dominance and Competitiveness: Helps reduce operating costs, ease grid strain, and boost building global competitiveness.
  • Support Cooperative Federalism: Serves as a unifying national platform across varied state and city energy rules.
  • Lead in AI Innovation: Electricity savings supported by ENERGY STAR, combined with American-made energy of all types, are requisite to meet the massive demands for power we need to lead the world in AI innovation.

Energy Hearings on Capitol Hill

  • Congressional committees held a series of energy-related hearings over the past two weeks, zeroing in on grid reliability, domestic supply, and the mounting electricity demands from artificial intelligence and data infrastructure.

RER remains committed to continued collaboration with EPA to advance the ENERGY STAR program as part of the administration’s ‘all of the above’ energy strategy, and goals to make the grid more resilient and reliable.

Roundtable Encourages Lawmakers to Extend and Enhance Opportunity Zone Incentives

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) wrote to the sponsors of the Opportunity Zone tax incentives encouraging them to extend and improve the tax benefits, which have successfully mobilized private investment in historically underserved communities. The letter to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) and Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) emphasizes the need for a long-term extension and targeted reforms to maximize OZs’ economic impact. (Letter)

CRE Impact

  • Since their enactment in 2017, OZs have spurred billions in private investment to revitalize distressed communities, finance affordable housing, and create jobs.
  • 72% of U.S. counties contain at least one OZ. By the end of 2022, the OZ tax incentives had helped mobilize $84.7 billion in investment for low-income areas. More recent estimates suggest OZs have attracted over $120 billion in capital. (Letter)
  • RER members have leveraged OZ funding to develop affordable housing, retail centers, office buildings, and life sciences facilities.

Roundtable Policy Recommendations

Under current law, the OZ tax benefits are phasing down and will expire altogether for new investments made after December 31, 2026. First and foremost, RER is advocating for a long-term extension of OZ tax benefits to spur continued investment and provide certainty to the private sector. Additional recommendations include: provide certainty to the private sector. Additional recommendations include:

  • Removing limitations on the type of capital eligible for investment in opportunity funds to allow a broader range of capital to flow into OZ investments;
  • Adding a new incentive for commercial-to-residential conversions to address housing shortages;
  • Establishing a rolling deferral period for new OZ investments to sustain long-term interest;
  • Improving the OZ working capital safe harbor to accommodate large-scale real estate developments;
  • Modifying the substantial improvement threshold to encourage redevelopment of vacant properties; and
  • Creating reporting and transparency requirements to track OZ impacts more effectively.

What’s Next

  • As Congress considers major tax legislation in 2025, long-term OZ reforms should be a priority to unlock additional private capital and sustain revitalization efforts in low-income communities.
  • Next week, HUD Secretary Scott Turner, an outspoken advocate for the OZ program will be a speaker at our Spring Roundtable Meeting. His recent tour of Philadelphia’s OZs showcased the transformative impact of public-private partnerships in revitalizing distressed areas. (Fox News, March 30)

RER will continue engaging with lawmakers to advance these recommendations and ensure Opportunity Zones remain a powerful tool for economic development.

Global Trade Tensions Escalate, Real Estate Industry Sees Mixed Outcomes

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A major escalation in the White House’s trade agenda this week introduced new tariffs on imports from major global partners—while sparing Canada and Mexico in a move important for construction and development.

Recap

  • On Wednesday, President Trump announced a minimum 10 percent tariff on imports from most countries, set to take effect Saturday. In addition, individualized, “reciprocal” tariffs that apply to specific countries will take effect next Wednesday, including raising overall tariffs on China to 54 percent. (White House, April 2)

  • While Canada and Mexico did not receive any new tariffs, other key trading partners were affected. The European Union was hit with a new 20 percent tariff, along with Japan (24 percent) and South Korea (25 percent), spurring a statement from the European Commission President indicating that plans for countermeasures are in motion. (Reuters, April 3)
  • The tariff exceptions for Canada and Mexico are positive for the real estate industry. Canada supplies about 85% of all U.S. softwood lumber imports—nearly a quarter of the total domestic supply in the U.S. Further exempting Mexican products is also a win given major construction cost drivers such as gypsum, concrete and near-shored appliances. (NAHB, April 3)
  • National Association of Home Builders Chairman Buddy Hughes said, “While the complexity of these reciprocal tariffs makes it hard to estimate the overall impact on housing, they will undoubtedly raise some construction costs. However, NAHB is pleased President Trump recognized the importance of critical construction inputs for housing and chose to continue current exemptions for Canadian and Mexican products, with a specific exemption for lumber from any new tariffs at this time.” (NAHB, April 3)

  • In TV interviews after the announcement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called for patience to not immediately retaliate and “asking to let’s see where this goes.” (Politico, April 3)

  • Markets and financial experts remain concerned about the ultimate endgame of the tariffs—whether they are meant to be permanent or represent negotiating leverage for the Trump administration to garner better deals with trading partners.
  • Speaking with reporters on Thursday, Trump seemed to indicate the latter, saying that “the rest of the world wants to see if they can make a deal.” (NBC News, April 3; Forbes, April 3)

Implications for CRE

  • Tariffs may present several challenges for commercial real estate, including increased construction costs, potential project delays, and heightened uncertainty among investors. (CBRE, March 19 | Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 14)
  • Higher tariffs on imported Chinese steel and aluminum will raise structural material costs, increasing expenses for developers and complicating efforts to address the housing shortage. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 24 | Nov. 27)
  • New tariffs also threaten to escalate energy costs by disrupting supply chains and raising prices for essential clean-tech components, underscoring the need to prioritize energy conservation strategies in commercial buildings. (E&E News, April 3 | NYT, April 3 | Forbes, March 20)
  • Embracing efficiency measures such as EPA’s ENERGY STAR program is now more important than ever—ensuring grid reliability, controlling operational costs, and unleashing American energy dominance amid growing economic pressures. [See ENERGY POLICY story below]

For now, deep uncertainties around trade and the administration’s tariff strategy leave long-term planning for investment and development in limbo. This latest round of tariffs is unlikely to be the last. RER will continue to track coverage on tariffs, and the implications for commercial real estate.

Honoring Longtime Real Estate Roundtable Member and Friend Donald B. Susswein

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable mourns the loss of Donald B. Susswein, a longtime member, brilliant tax expert, and dedicated mentor who passed away April 2.

  • Don served as a partner in RSM‘s Washington National Tax office, where he helped build the firm’s Passthrough Tax Consulting Capability and guided many colleagues into leadership roles — a source of immense pride for him.
  • His distinguished career also included roles at two Big 4 firms, a partner at Thacher Proffitt and Wood, a Wall Street law firm, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, and the Department of Justice.
  • Throughout his years with RER, Don was a driving force behind our Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC), offering his expertise through monthly calls, studies, panels, and helping craft amicus briefs that helped advance our tax policy priorities. Don was a key architect of the partnership audit reform legislation enacted in 2015 and a major contributor to the development of the pass-through business income deduction enacted in 2017.  His work revolutionized the way the tax community thinks about like-kind exchanges (as part of a broader continuum of deferrals available for business restructurings).  From FIRPTA, to cancellation of indebtedness, to unrealized gains, Don tackled many other difficult issues through The Roundtable. 
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer said, “Don was a genius — a brilliant problem solver and a loyal, supportive friend. His clever comments and contagious smile brought levity and clarity to even the most complex policy debates. I’ve known Don since the mid-1980s, when he was already recognized on Capitol Hill as one of the true tax policy sharpies. If you wanted to discuss tax legislation with Don you had to bring your “A” game, even so his game was always “A-plus”. We will deeply miss his voice at The Roundtable, especially in our tax policy deliberations.”
  • Roundtable Senior Vice President and Counsel Ryan McCormick said, “Don was a mentor, coauthor, and friend who brought tremendous wit and wisdom to every complicated tax issue we tackled.  Don delighted in the opportunity to solve the unsolvable, and he often succeeded.  From partnership audit reform to section 199A to like-kind exchanges, Don brought ideas and insights that challenged traditional thinking, transformed debates, and led Congress to enact better laws.  Don made many selfless contributions to The Roundtable and our industry, but it is his kindness and steadfast friendship that will be most missed.”

A funeral service is scheduled for Tuesday, April 8 at the Garden of Remembrance Chapel in Clarksburg, MD with a live stream available. In lieu of flowers, a donation in his memory can be made to the Special Olympics, Young Artists of America, and Donate Life DC. (See Obituary for details)

Lawmakers Weigh Tax Priorities as Roundtable Emphasizes Need to Protect Deductibility of Property Taxes

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Congress returned to Capitol Hill this week facing a tight window to deliver on a range of policy priorities ahead of its April recess. As discussions intensify, Roundtable advocacy efforts continue to focus on avoiding harmful limitation on the deductibility of state and local business-related property taxes. (Punchbowl News, March 28)

Tax Talks

  • Congressional Republicans are navigating a range of considerations amid pressure from the White House to enact its tax agenda and from conservatives mindful of the deficit. (WSJ, March 26)
  • If Senate Republicans succeed in using the baseline strategy, it would significantly alter the final instructions for the House and Senate tax committees.
  • Under this approach, extending or making permanent many provisions from the 2017 tax cuts would effectively be cost-free. However, GOP deficit hawks may still need offsets for other elements of the tax package.
  • “Business SALT” and potential restrictions on the deductibility of state and local property taxes as a possible revenue offset for the tax bill. (WSJ, March 25)
  • State and local property taxes represent 40 percent of the operating costs of U.S. commercial real estate, a greater expense than utilities, maintenance and insurance costs combined. This tax change could reverse the benefits of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and Section 199A, potentially raising effective tax rates to 1970s-era levels near 50%. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 28; March 14) 
  • RER continues to lead advocacy efforts surrounding business SALT. RER members and staff are actively engaging with Congressional leaders on Capitol Hill, and educating lawmakers on the potentially devastating impacts of the proposals under consideration.
  • Earlier this month, RER and sixteen other national real estate organizations wrote to members of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees urging them to oppose any proposal that would cap or eliminate the deductibility of state and local business property taxes.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 14) (BisNow, March 13)
  • RER members are proactively contacting congressional offices, reinforcing opposition to any legislation that would restrict or eliminate deductions for state and local business property taxes.
  • All RER members are strongly encouraged to amplify this message to their representatives in Congress. Read more here.

State of Play – Budget

  • Congressional Republicans are grappling with how to pay for President Donald Trump’s multi-trillion-dollar tax-cut and immigration reform agenda. (Reuters, March 27)
  • With GOP lawmakers eager to finalize a budget framework for the planned megabill, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) are signaling that they will move forward on the fiscal blueprint without first resolving major disputes over the offsets needed to extend Trump’ s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). (Politico, March 26)
  • Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has projected that the U.S. government may reach its statutory debt ceiling by August or September unless Congress and the president agree to raise or suspend the borrowing limit.
  • Despite ongoing disagreements, an area of consensus has emerged: Speaker Johnson and Leader Thune are aligning around including a debt limit increase in the budget package—a move Senate Republicans had previously resisted. (Politico, March 26)
  • Failure to act could lead to a default on debt, risking economic stability, market volatility and lower property values. (AP, March 26)

Both chambers are targeting the week of April 7 to finalize the budget resolution, which would enable the reconciliation process needed to advance their legislative agenda in the months ahead.

Ways and Means Members Reintroduce Bipartisan Property Conversions Legislation

Posted on by Trey Jackson

On Thursday, House Ways and Means Committee Members Mike Carey (R-OH) and Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) reintroduced the bipartisan Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act of 2025 (H.R.2410), which would create a market-based tax incentive for converting older commercial buildings to residential use.

Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act

  • The bipartisan bill, introduced by 15 House Democrats and 12 House Republicans, is strongly supported by The Real Estate Roundtable and a broad coalition of national organizations. The bill would help modernize U.S. real estate, create new and affordable housing, and strengthen cities and neighborhoods that continue to suffer from the aftereffects of the pandemic. (Bill Summary)
  • “Right now, vacant commercial and office space is sitting unused, and converting these properties into housing is often so expensive it isn’t worth doing,” said Rep. Carey (R-OH). “This bipartisan bill will allow communities to expand their supply of affordable housing by upgrading existing buildings, allowing American downtowns and main streets to thrive with new investments.” (Rep. Carey Press Release)
Rep. Mike Carey (R-OH)
  • The bill would create a new and temporary 20% tax credit for qualified property conversion expenditures, modeled after the historic rehabilitation credit. (RER’S One-Page Summary)
  • “The housing crisis is squeezing family budgets, while empty commercial and office buildings sit unused in downtowns and in suburban and rural communities,” Rep. Gomez said. “Our bipartisan bill converts these empty commercial buildings into homes families can afford—a smart way to fix both problems.” (Rep. Gomez Press Release)
  • The total credit authority would be limited to $15 billion, allocated by state housing finance agencies based on feasibility and impact.
  • Larger credits would be available for projects in rural areas, low-income census tracts, and economically distressed areas.
  • The credit could be stacked with other federal tax benefits, including LIHTC, the rehabilitation credit, and Opportunity Zone benefits. 

Roundtable Advocacy

  • The bill addresses and incorporates many of the recommendations a RER-led coalition had collectively made to the Revitalizing Downtowns Act in comment letters submitted in October 2022 and June 2024.  
  • Both letters are the product of a property conversions working group created by RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC). The working group has reviewed and considered the challenges and impediments confronting potential property conversion activities. (Roundtable Weekly, June 2024)

RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee will continue working with policymakers to advance tax policies that encourage and facilitate property conversion efforts.

Housing Policy Updates: Comment Letter to FTC on Single-Family Rental Industry , GSE Considerations, and Tenant Protection Policy Developments

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Housing policy remains at the forefront this week as The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) responded to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) request for public comment on the impact that the large-scale single-family rental (SFR) owner-operators are having on the housing market; the Trump administration continues to explore privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; and Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte rescinded a renter protection directive.

Single-Family Rental Housing Study

  • RER and Nareit responded this week to the FTC’s request for public comment  regarding the impact that large-scale Single-Family Rental (SFR) operators and institutional investors are having on home prices and rents in the single-family housing. (Letter)
  • The FTC aims to assess whether “mega investors” influence housing prices negatively.
  • The letter underscores that institutional capital is essential to expanding housing supply and addressing the chronic housing shortage affecting affordability nationwide.
  • As stated in the letter, “Single-family rentals, now part of an institutionally supported asset class, add balance to the U.S. housing market.  SFRs play an important role in the nation’s housing landscape by boosting supply and offering flexible, high-quality housing options that have broad demographic appeal at lower price points compared to home ownership.” 
  • SFR homes constitute only 32 percent of rental units nationally, consistent with historical averages.
  • Institutional investors accounted for a mere 0.3 percent of single-family home purchases in the past year. (BisNow, Feb. 3)
  • The letter emphasized that institutional investors own less than 0.5 percent of U.S. single-family homes, thus not driving the housing affordability crisis.

GSE Reform

  • The Trump administration is actively exploring housing finance reform options, including privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (WSJ, March 23)
  • Recent proposals suggest transferring the Treasury’s stakes to a newly envisioned U.S. sovereign wealth fund. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently discussed this possibility on a podcast, although he provided limited details. (Bloomberg, March 23)
  • Director Bill Pulte and Sec. Bessent have stated that they would like Freddie and Fannie to go private, but not at the cost of disrupting mortgage rates. (Commercial Observer, March 21)
  • An executive order is also under consideration, which could direct federal departments to examine the privatization of Fannie and Freddie.
  • This proposal has drawn substantial attention from housing industry leaders concerned about potential impacts on mortgage markets and affordable housing.

Tenant Protection Policy Rescinded

  • This week, FHFA Director Pulte rescinded a Biden-era directive requiring multifamily housing providers with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed mortgages to provide renters a 30-day rent increase notice, lease term expirations and a five-day late payment grace period. (GlobeSt, March 26)
  • Pulte contended that this directive increased compliance burdens for lenders and property owners, noting existing state and local regulations already cover lease notices and late fee guidelines.
  • RER along with other national real estate organizations Industry groups such as the National Apartment Association and the National Multifamily Housing Council had opposed the policy, arguing it imposed undue burdens on housing providers. (Bisnow, March 25 | Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 2023)
  • This move aligns with broader industry efforts advocating fewer regulatory constraints to foster housing market stability.

Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Scott Turner will be a featured speaker at The Roundtable’s Spring Roundtable Meeting on April 8, 2025 (Roundtable-level members only).

Treasury Removes Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements for U.S. Companies

Posted on by Trey Jackson
Treasury Department's FinCEN logo

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an interim final rule last week that removes the requirement for U.S. companies and persons to report Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). (Bloomberg, March 25)

Why It Matters

  • The March 21 rule significantly narrows the scope of the CTA—effectively dismantling key provisions and easing compliance burdens for millions of domestic businesses. (National Law Review, March 25)
  • Treasury previously estimated that 32 million entities would be subject to the requirement. Under the revised rule, only about 11,600 foreign firms operating in the U.S. would have to disclose their ownership on average each year. (FinCen, March 21)
  • Due to the far-reaching scope of the CTA, RER has long raised concerns about the regulatory burden and cost the CTA would impose on many commercial and residential real estate investment businesses. (Roundtable Weekly, March 7)
  • The decision marks a major shift in financial transparency regulation, easing compliance burdens on small businesses and other domestic entities.

New Reporting Framework

  • FinCEN prepared a series of questions and answers (Q&As) to address inquiries relating to the Beneficial Ownership Information Interim Final Rule.
  • In the interim final rule, FinCEN revises the definition of “reporting company” in its implementing regulations to mean only those entities that are formed under the law of a foreign country and that have registered to do business in any U.S. State or Tribal jurisdiction by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or similar office (formerly known as “foreign reporting companies”).
  • FinCEN also exempts entities previously known as “domestic reporting companies” from BOI reporting requirements.
  • Domestic companies and their beneficial owners are no longer required to file BOI reports, nor update or correct previously filed reports.
  • Foreign reporting companies must still report—but only for non-U.S. owners.
  • U.S. persons with ownership in foreign entities are exempt from BOI disclosure.
  • New deadlines apply for foreign companies to file initial reports—either 30 days after the rule’s Federal Register publication or 30 days post-registration to do business in the U.S., whichever is later.

What’s Next

  • FinCEN is accepting comments on the interim rule for 60 days and intends to finalize it later this year.

As RER works to develop comments for FinCEN on the March 21 Interim Final Rule, we welcome member input.

Real Estate Industry Urges Congress to Preserve Carried Interest

Posted on by Trey Jackson

As tax negotiations continue this week on Capitol Hill, a coalition of 17 national real estate organizations submitted a unified message to congressional leadership urging preservation of current law on carried interest. (Letter)

Why It Matters

  • The coalition letter, led by the National Multifamily Housing Council and joined by The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and others, highlighted that taxing all carried interest as ordinary income would raise taxes on 2.2 million real estate partnerships and nearly 9.7 million partners, potentially stalling new housing, infrastructure, and redevelopment projects.
  • Since carried interest and its tax treatment first emerged as a controversial political issue in 2007, RER has consistently opposed legislative proposals to tax all carried interest at ordinary income rates. (Axios, March 24 | NYT, March 8)
  • Research cited in the letter demonstrates that carried interest legislation would lower wages, reduce property values, and undermine economic growth. (Letter)

What’s At Stake

  • “Taxing carried interest at ordinary income rates would discourage the risk taking that drives job creation and economic growth. It would reduce economic mobility by increasing the tax burden on cash-poor entrepreneurs who want to retain an ownership interest in their business. It would have profound unintended consequences for housing affordability and main streets all across our country,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable. Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 21)
  • The coalition emphasized that changing the tax treatment would particularly impact small and mid-sized real estate entrepreneurs who contribute sweat equity rather than large capital contributions to their projects.
  • The letter notes that the tax code ”has never, and should never, limit the reward for risk-taking to taxpayers who have cash to invest.”
  • Retroactive application of new tax policies on longstanding partnership agreements could harm small businesses, stifle entrepreneurs and sweat equity, and threaten future improvements and infrastructure in neglected areas.
  • Under the headline “Carried Interest Fight Gets Real,” media outlet Politico wrote that the real estate industry was “laying down a marker as lawmakers begin working to pass a deficit-conscious extension of the 2017 tax cuts.” (Politico, March 27)
  • The signatories of the letter included: National Multifamily Housing Council; American Hotel and Lodging Association; American Resort Development Association; American Seniors Housing Association; CCIM Institute; Council for Affordable and Rural Housing; ICSC Institute of Real Estate Management; Latino Hotel Association; Manufactured Housing Institute; Mortgage Bankers Association; NAIOP, the Commercial Real Estate Development Association; National Apartment Association; National Association of Black Hotel Owners, Operators, and Developers; National Association of Home Builders; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

RER urges lawmakers to retain current law and avoid policies that would disincentivize investment, threaten housing affordability, and penalize job-creating entrepreneurs.